2024 (21), №2

Goods in the System of Basic Moral, Ethical and Economic Concepts

For citation: 

Dyatel, E. P. (2024). Goods in the System of Basic Moral, Ethical and Economic Concepts. AlterEconomics, 21(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.13

Abstract:

The article aims to explore the essence and attributes of “good” as a moral, ethical, and economic category, alongside methods for its institutionalization in normative and market economies. It pursues two main objectives: first, to delineate the moral and ethical dimensions of “good” as per J. Rawls’ seminal work “The Theory of Justice,” which has received limited attention among Russian economists; and second, to exa­mine the economic aspects of “good” from the perspective of positive economic theory. The study employs a theoretical and methodological framework rooted in economic science, drawing from classical political eco­nomy and neoclassical perspectives, while integrating insights from philosophy, sociology, and legal regulations of economic activities. Methods of comparative analysis are applied, involving critical evaluations of primary sources, historical facts, and economic statistics. The study concludes that “good,” understood as a moral, ethical, and economic concept, reflects the dialectical interplay between natural conditions, historically shaped social factors, and individual resources (factors). These elements collectively influence the dynamics of production, exchange, and consumption in economic services.

PDF full
Downloaded: 3

Evgeny P. Dyatel — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Research Associate at the Center for Economic Theory, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-8060 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation, 29; e-mail: dyatel1942@mail.ru).

Abou, S. (1995). La république jésuite des Guaranís (1609–1768) et son héritage. Librairie Académique Perrin [etc.].

Arrow, K. J. (1973). Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawl’s Theory of Justice. The Journal of Philosophy, 70 (9), 245−263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025006

Barybina, A. Z. (2022). Digital Platforms of the Metaverses as a Digital Twin. Iskusstvennye obshchestva [Artificial Societies], 17 (4). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207751800022959-3 (In Russ.)

Bloom, A. (1975). Justice: John Rawls Vs. The Tradition of Political Philosophy. American Political Science Review, 69 (2), 648−662. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959094

Bloom, A. (1991). Giants and Dwarfs: Essays 1960–1990 (pp. 315–415). Simon & Schuster.

Bolzano, B. (2003). Uchenie o nauke (Naukouchenie). Izbrannoe [Theory of Science. A Selection].
St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

Cicero, M. T. (1994). Estetika: traktaty, rechi, pis’ma [Aesthetics: treatises, speeches, letters]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2018). Theoretical Foundation of Dialectics of Economic Development in Karl Marx’s Capital. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 14 (3), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-3 (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2022). Where are the Frontiers of Economics? Upravlenets [The Manager], 13 (3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-5 (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2023). “Conceptual Framework” of Economic Theory: History, Potential, and Prospects of Application. AlterEconomics, 20 (3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.3 (In Russ.)

Einhorn, E. (2022). Izbrannyy vyzhit’ [Chosen to Survive]. Moscow: Ripol Classic Publ. (In Russ.)

Harsanyi, J. C. (1975). Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory. American Political Science Review, 69 (2), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959090

Helmedag, F. (2003). A Fair Wage: Standards and Facts. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], (7), 21–31. (In Russ.)

Helmedag, F. (2003). Faire Löhne: Normen und Fakten. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 4 (1), 17−28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2516.t01-1-00003

Helmedag, F. (2019). Marx and Keynes: From Exploitation to Employment. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 16 (2), 260−271. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2019.0048

Jeffrey, D. L. (1996). People of the Book: Christian Identity and Literary Culture. Eerdmans.

Jevons, W. S. (1924). The Theory of Political Economy. Macmillan.

Lenin, V. I. (1973). Tri istochnika i tri sostavnye chasti marksizma [The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism]. Collected Works. Vol. 23. 5th Edition (pp. 40−48.) Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Levin, G. D. (2005). Problema universaliy. Sovremennyy vzglyad [The Problem of Universals. Modern View]. Moscow: KANON+. (In Russ.)

Makh, E. (2003). Poznanie i zabluzhdenie. Ocherki po psikhologii issledovaniya [Knowledge and Error. Essays on Psychology Research]. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy Publ. (In Russ.)

Marx, K. (1960). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. T. I. Kniga I [Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Book 1]. Sochineniya [Selected Works]. Vol. 23 (pp. 5–907). Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955). Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German Ideology]. Sochineniya [Selected Works]. Vol. 3 (pp. 7–544). Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Mills, C. W. (2017). Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism. Oxford University Press.

Neretina, S. S., & Ogurtsov, A. P. (2006). Puti k universaliyam [Paths to Universals]. St. Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. (In Russ.)

Nozick, R. (1993). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (pp. 183–231). Blackwell Publishers.

Nureev, R. M. (2011). Kurs mikroekonomiki [The Course of Microeconomics]. 3rd Edition. Moscow: NORMA Publ., INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.)

Rawls, J. (1995). Teoriya spravedlivosti [A Theory of justice.]. Translated from English and preface by V. V. Tselishchev. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University Publ. (In Russ.)

Rubinstein, A. Ya. (2008). K teorii rynkov “opekaemykh blag” (nauchnyy doklad) [Toward the Theory of Markets for “Protected Goods” (scientific report)]. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the RAS. (In Russ.)

Samuelson, P. A. (1969). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditures and Taxation. In J. Margolis and
H. Guitton (Eds.), Public Economics.

Schultz, B. (2023). Henry Sidgwick. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta, Uri Nodelman (Eds.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/sidgwick/ (Date of access: 25.01.2024).

Sen, A. (2009). Rawls and Beyond. The Idea of Justice (pp. 52−74). New York: Belknap Press (Harvard University Press).

Shmanske, S. (1991). Public Goods, Mixed Goods, and Monopolistic Competition. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 225.

Sorokin, T. A. (2010). Good as Economic Category in Modern Economy. Vestnik SGSEU [Vestnik of Saratov State Socio-Economic University], (3(32)), 24–26. (In Russ.)

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.

von Delhaes, K. (1993). Organising the Supply of Public Goods in the Transition Process. Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 5 (1), 87−101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631379308427746