For citation:
Bagirova, A. P., & Neshataev, A. V. (2024). The Potential Influence of Russian Employers on Regional Demographic Trends. AlterEconomics, 21(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.6
Abstract:
A new state policy in Russia aims to involve businesses in family and demographic issues. The importance of engaging enterprises in solving demographic problems is emphasized, as the state introduces relevant regulations and incentives and publicizes results through the “Business Reputation Index of Business Entities (EKG-rating)”. Theoretically, these processes align with corporate citizenship theory, which posits that companies have an obligation to assume a share of responsibility proportional to their operational rights. This study examines how Russians of reproductive age view employers as potential influencers of demographic policy and how these views relate to their reproductive intentions. Data were collected in the autumn of 2023. The study found that 25 % of respondents believe that employer support for parents can increase birth rates in their regions. Overall, employers are seen to have a relatively minor influence on people’s reproductive attitudes. Those who appreciate employer support tend to delay having their first child. The perceived influence of employers is associated with an earlier ideal age for starting a family and a desire for more children. Moreover, those who see employers as influential tend to believe that having more children is essential for personal fulfillment. These findings suggest the potential for enhancing demographic policy by involving employers and underscore the importance of state policies that engage enterprises in regional demographic agendas.
Bagirova, A. P., & Vavilova, A. S. (2022). Corporate Demographic Policy: The Reality and Development Opportunities in Russian Organizations. Upravlenets [The Manager], 13 (5), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-5-3 (In Russ.)
Bourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond Work-Family Balance: Are Family-Friendly Organizations More Attractive? Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 65 (1), 98–117. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23078261 (Date of access: 18.03.2024).
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). The Emergence of Corporate Citizenship: Historical Development and Alternative Perspectives. In A. Scherer, G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (pp. 25−49). Edward Elgar.
Dodd, M. D. (2018). Globalization, Pluralization, and Erosion: The impact of Shifting Societal Expectations for Advocacy and Public Good. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2 (2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p221
Eastern Economic Forum (2023). Delovaya programma [Business Programme]. https://forumvostok.ru/programme/business-programme/ (Date of access: 18.03.2024). (In Russ.)
EPS-ranking (2023). Natsional’nyy standart “Indeks delovoy reputatsii sub’ektov predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti (EKG-reyting)” [National Standard “Business Reputation Index of Business Entities (EPS-ranking)”]. https://xn—-etbbhpfd3axw8i.xn--p1ai/ (Date of access: 18.03.2024). (In Russ.)
Hamann, R., Acutt, N., & Kapelus, P. (2003). Responsibility versus accountability? Interpreting the World Summit on Sustainable Development for a synthesis model of corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (9), 32−48.
Hao, Y., Wang, Y., & Lu, H. (2016). A Review of Research and the Status of Implementation of Family-Oriented Policies. Human Resource Development in China, 23, 41–49. (In Chinese).
Hoggy, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Context. The Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121−140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
Ismael, F. O., Yeşiltaş, M., & Andrea, S. R. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Citizenship Behaviour, Work Engagement, and Job Embeddedness. International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility, 6 (1), 19−29. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsecsr.2021010102
Jang, H., & Ahn, H. (2021). Organizational Responses to Work-Life Balance Issues: The Adoption and Use of Family-Friendly Policies in Korean Organizations. International Review of Public Administration, 26 (3), 238−253. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2021.1916143
John, A., Qadeer, F., Shahzadi, G., & Jia, F. (2019). Getting Paid to Be Good: How and When Employees Respond to Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 784−795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.074
Jones, D. A. (2010). Does Serving the Community also Serve the Company? Using Organizational Identification and Social Exchange Theories to Understand Employee Responses to a Volunteerism Programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 (4), 857−878. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477495
Kim, J., & Wiggins, M. E. (2011). Family-Friendly Human Resource Policy: Is It Still Working in the Public Sector? Public Administration Review, 71 (5), 728−739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02412.x
Klupt, M. A. (2006). Development of a Demographic Development Strategy as a Field of Interdisciplinary Synthesis]. Leontevskie chteniya [Leontief Readings], (4), 26−40. (In Russ.)
Lee, S.-Y., & Hong, J. H. (2011). Does Family-Friendly Policy Matter? Testing Its Impact on Turnover and Performance. Public Administration Review, 71 (6), 870–879. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41317386 (Date of access: 18.03.2024).
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: An Investigation of French Businesses. Journal of Business Research, 51 (1), 37−51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00042-9
McAllister, M. L., Fitzpatrick, P., & Fonseca, A. (2014). Challenges of Space and Place for Corporate “Citizens” and Healthy Mining Communities: The case of Logan Lake, BC and Highland Valley Copper. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1 (2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2014.04.005
Munasinghe, M., & Shearer, W. (1995). An Introduction to the Measurement of Biogeophysical Sustainability. In M. Munasinghe, W. Shearer (Eds.), Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The Biogeophysical Foundations. United Nations University and World Bank.
Nabergoj, A. S., & Pahor, M. (2016). Family-Friendly Workplace: An Analysis of Organizational Effects in the Transition Economy. Journal of East European Management Studies, 21 (3), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1688/JEEMS-2016-Nabergoj
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance:
A Meta-Analysis. Organization studies, 24 (3), 403−441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Peregudov, S. P., & Semenenko, I. S. (2008). Korporativnoe grazhdanstvo: kontseptsii, mirovaya praktika i rossiyskie realii [Corporate Citizenship: The World and Russia]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publishers. (In Russ.)
Rasool, I., & Rajput, A. (2017). The Impact of Perceived Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Micro-Perspective Analysis. Business & Economic Review, 9 (1), 181−201. https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/9.1.10
Rostovskaya, T. K., Shabunova, A. A., & Bagirova, A. P. (2021). The Concept for Corporate Demographic Policy of Russian Enterprises in the Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 14 (5), 151−164. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.9 (In Russ.)
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126 (5), 1763−1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Tang, A. D., Luu, T. T., Chen, W. K., & Liu, S. C. (2023). Internal Corporate Social Responsibility and Customer-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Job Satisfaction, Work-Family Facilitation, Life Satisfaction, and the Moderating Role of Organizational Tenure. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32 (5), 986−1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2195134
Tutton, J., & Brand, V. (2023). Should Business have ‘a Sense of Morality’?: Company Director Views on Corporate Engagement with Socio-Political Issues. Public Relations Review, 49 (1), 102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102278
Vavilova, A. S. (2021). Role of Corporate Demographic Policy in Supporting the Family and Human Capacity Development. III Vserossiyskiy demograficheskiy forum s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem: Materialy foruma, Moskva, 03–04 dekabrya 2021 goda [III All-Russian Demographic Forum with International Participation: Materials of the Forum, Moscow, December 03–04, 2021] (pp. 26−29). Moscow: FCTAS RAS. https://doi.org/10.19181/forum.978-5-89697-373-7.2021.5 (In Russ.)
Vitik, S. V. (2012). Stimulirovanie reproduktivnogo truda na rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh: mekhanizm i otsenka effektivnosti [Stimulation of Reproductive Labor in Russian Enterprises: Mechanism and Effectiveness Assessment]. Dissertation Abstract for the degree of Cand. Sci. (Econ.): Economics and Management of the National Economy (Labor Economics). Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University. https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/4325/2/urfu0977s.pdf (Date of access: 18.03.2024). (In Russ.)
Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate Citizenship and Corporate Social Investment: Drivers of Tri-sector Partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1 (1), 57–73.
Warhurst, A. (2005). Future Roles of Business in Society: The Expanding Boundaries of Corporate Responsibility and a Compelling Case for Partnership. Futures, 37 (2–3), 151–168. https://doi:10.1016/j.futures.2004.03.033