2022 (19), №1

Technological Development and Structural Changes in National Economies

For citation: 

Dementiev, V. E. (2022). Technological Development and Structural Changes in National Economies. AlterEconomics, 19(1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-1.7.


In the context of the industrial revolution, national governments’ ability to develop effective structural policies is becoming particularly relevant. The purpose of the article is to analyze the theoretical underpinnings of such policies. The main focus is made on the provisions of the «new structural economy» and the theory of long waves or Kondratiev cycles associated with the changing patterns of technological development. The study shows that an effective structural policy should take into account the increasing role of intellectual assets in the development of modern and traditional sectors of economy. Measures proposed within the framework of the «new structural economics» for catching-up economies are discussed in relation to five groups of industries. In the light of the risks that developing countries have to deal with in their pursuit of operational efficiency, the recommendation to move to the beginning or end of the value chain should not be perceived as a one-size-fits-all solution. Another question to be considered is the evolution of the sectoral structure of economy during the transition from one technological mode to another. National policy-makers should give due regard to the prospect that some industries belonging to the preceding technological mode will be included into the structure of the key industries in the new mode. Our analysis has also demonstrated an undulating change in the proportion of investments in intellectual assets within the general structure of investments in private fixed assets in some industries. It is argued that the growing tolerance of economic policy towards unprofitable firms, observed in crisis conditions, increases the inertia of economic development. As these firms manage to survive through the crisis, the growth of more productive companies is hindered and the overall dynamics of returns from factors of production suffers. Therefore, a structural policy should address not only intersectoral, but also intra-sectoral shifts in the use of resources, which may be a subject for further research.

PDF full
Downloaded: 50

Victor E. DEMENTIEV, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the RAS, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the RAS, 47, Nakhimovsky prospect, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation, e-mail: vedementev@rambler.ru.  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-3999

Agenor, P., Canuto, O. & Jelenic, M. (2012). Avoiding Middle-income Growth Traps.  Economic Premise, 98,  1-7.

Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C. & Gal, P. (2016). The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy.  OECD Productivity Working Papers, 5.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/63629cc9-en.

Antipina, O. N. (2013). Kakovo budushchee rynochnoy ekonomiki? (O knige Dzhastina Ifu Linya “The Quest for Prosperity”) [What is the future of the market economy? (About Justin Yifu Lin “The Quest for Prosperity”].  Voprosy ekonomiki [Voprosy ekonomiki], 9,  150-160. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-150-160. (In Russ.)

Best, M. (2002).  Novaya konkurenciya. Instituty promyshlennogo razvitiya. [The New Competition. Institutions of Industrial Restructuring].  Moscow, Russia: TEIS, 356. (In Russ.)

Dementiev, V. E. (2019). Paradoks proizvoditel’nosti v regional’nom izmerenii [Productivity Paradox in Regional Dimension].  Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 15(1),  43-56. DOI: 17059/2019-1-4. (In Russ.)

Dementiev, V. E. (2021a). Cepochki sozdaniya cennosti pered vyzovami cifrovizacii i ekonomicheskogo spada [The value chain facing the challenges of digitalization and the economic downturn].  Voprosy Ekonomiki [Voprosy ekonomiki], 3,  68-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-3-68-83. (In Russ.)

Dementiev, V. E. (2021b). Model’ interferentsii dlinnykh voln ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The model of interference of long waves of economic development].  Komp’yuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie [Computer Research and Modeling], 13(3),  649-663. DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2021-13-3-649-663. (In Russ.)

Glaziev, S. Yu. (2010).  Strategiya operezhayushchego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyah global’nogo krizisa [The strategy of advanced development of Russia in the context of the global crisis].  Moscow, Russia: Ekonomika, 255. (In Russ.)

Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R. & Valentinyi, Á. (2013). Growth and Structural Transformation.  NBER Working Papers, 18996. 

Hirooka, M. (2006).  Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective.  Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 448.

Lin, J. Y. (2012).  The Quest for Prosperity: How Developing Economies Can Take Off.  Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 344.

Lin, J. Y. (2017). Industrial policies for avoiding the middle-income trap: a new structural economics perspective.  Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(1),  5-18. DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2017.1287539.

Lin, J. Y. (2020). New structural economics: the third generation of development economics.  Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(3),  279-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-02-2019-0039.

Manyika, J., Lund, S. et al. (2019). Globalization in transition: The future of trade and value chains.  McKinsey Global Institute.  URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/innovation-and-growth/globalization-in-transition-the-future-of-trade-and-value-chains (дата обращения: 08.09.2021).

Manyika, J., Ramaswamy S. et al. (2018). ‘Superstars’: The dynamics of firms, sectors, and cities leading the global economy.  McKinsey Global Institute.  Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/innovation-and-growth/superstars-the-dynamics-of-firms-sectors-and-cities-leading-the-global-economy (Date of access: 01.10.2021).

McGowan, M.A. & Andrews, D., Millot, V. (2017). The Walking Dead? Zombie Firms and Productivity Performance in OECD Countries.  OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1372.  DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/180d80ad-en.

OECD (2010).  Handbook on Deriving Capital Measures of Intellectual Property Products.  Paris: OECD Publishing, 167.

Pack, H. & K. Saggi. (2006). Is there a Case for Industrial Policy: A Critical Survey.  World Bank Research Observer, 21(2),  267-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkl001.

Porter, M. (2005).  Konkurentsiya [On competition].  Moscow, Russia: Publishing house “Vil’yams”, 608. (In Russ.)

Rodrik, D. (2011) Comments on “New Structural Economics” by Justin Yifu Lin.  World Bank Research Observer, 26(2),  227-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkr010.

Sturgeon, T. J. & Kawakami, M. (2011). Global value chains in the electronics industry: characteristics, crisis, and upgrading opportunities for firms from developing countries.  International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 4(1),  120-147. DOI: 10.1504/IJTLID.2011.041902.