For citation:
Trifonov, V. A. (2026). Residents as Meso-groups: A Conceptual Approach to Preferential Regimes and Spatial Development. AlterEconomics, 23(3), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2026.23-3.4
Abstract:
The study develops a conceptual approach to using preferential regimes for the spatial development of the Russian economy, focusing on their potential to support neighboring territories, reduce regional disparities, and strengthen regional connections. It reviews existing research, identifies the factors underlying the relevant national economic problem, formulates the objectives and principles of the approach, develops its theoretical foundations, and identifies priority locations for preferential regimes. The study uses general scientific methods, including systemic, structural, and institutional analysis, as well as analysis of regulatory and methodological documents. The approach is based on two principles: preferential regimes should generate positive effects in neighboring territories, particularly at the mesoeconomic level, and their parameters should align with national strategic planning documents. The approach draws on the theory of “new locality” (“new places”), mesoeconomics, territorial-production complexes, smart specialization, and innovation diffusion, and is based on four principles: macro-zoning, mesoeconomic openness, infrastructural encumbrance of benefits, and managed diffusion of innovations. The study proposes tools to strengthen interaction between residents of preferential regimes and economic agents in adjacent territories, encourage residents’ participation in territorial development, and support the formation of local and inter-territorial supply chains and communities. It also proposes prioritizing anchor settlements with major investment projects and settlements within agglomerations as locations for preferential regimes. The study’s contribution to the field lies in its focus on the effects of preferential regimes beyond their immediate boundaries, particularly through anchor settlements and mesogroups that can disseminate self-organization and self-development practices across adjacent territories. The findings can support improvements to the regulatory framework, while further research will develop a methodology for assessing these effects on adjacent territories and national spatial development.
Ardasheva, E. P. (2007). Typology of mesoeconomics. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Kazan Technological University], (3-4), 218–229. EDN IJWAZF (In Russ.)
Averina, L. M., Naumov, I. V., & Sedelnikov, V. M. (2020). Evolution of the Spatial Development Theories: Principal Features and Modern Objectives of Research. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-2.12 (In Russ.)
Ayurzanain, A. B. (2025). Institutional Analysis of the Introduction of a Single Preferential Treatment in the Russian Far East. Ekonomicheskiye nauki [Economic Sciences], ((12)253), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.253.114 (In Russ.)
Ayurzanain, A. B. (2026). Implementation of the Unified Preferential Regime in the Far East: Institutional Analysis from the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory. Ekonomicheskiye nauki [Economic Sciences], (1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.254.48 (In Russ.)
Bandman, M. K. (1980). Territorial’no-proizvodstvennyye kompleksy: teoriya i praktika predplanovykh issledovaniy [Territorial-Production Complexes: Theory and Practice of Pre-Plannend Research]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 254. (In Russ.)
Bennett, R. J., & McCoshan, A. (1993). Enterprise and human resource development: Local capacity building. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Borshchevskiy, G. A. (2024). Influence of preferential regimes on the Russian Far East development. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-103-124 (In Russ.)
Buchwald, E. M., & Bessonov, I. S. (2026). The Strategic Dilemma of Support Settlements: Between Self-Development and Transfer Dependence. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 19(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2026.1.103.7 (In Russ.)
Buchwald, E. M., & Valentik, O. N. (2024). Spatial Development Strategy: Stage of Radical Renewal. Regional’naya ekonomika. Yug Rossii [Regional Economics. South of Russia], 12(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2024.1.1 (In Russ.)
Buchwald, Ye. M. (2021). Federal Territories as the Innovation of the Policy of Spatial Development in the Russian Federation. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], (3(157)), 44–46. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2021.3.7 (In Russ.)
Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the city. Routledge.
Danilova, I. V., Savelyeva, I. P., & Rezepin, A. V. (2022). Impact of Inter-territorial Cohesion on the Development of Regional Economic Spaces. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions], 18(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-3 (In Russ.)
Eastman, S., & Kaeding, N. (2019). Opportunity Zones: What We Know and What We Don’t. Washington, DC: Tax Foundation.
Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2009). City-regions: New geographies of uneven development and inequality. Regional Studies, 43(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801968353
Figueroa, D. (2020). Economic Opportunity & Resilience: Opportunity Zones & Equity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753669
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialization: From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. MTEI Working Paper.
Galiullina, G. F., & Romanova, O. A. (2025a). Changing the Role of Territories of Advanced Development in the New Reality Conditions. Natsional’nyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 21(8), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.24891/kyywsm (In Russ.)
Galiullina, G. F., & Romanova, O. A. (2025b). Territories of Advanced Development as a Priority
of Spatial Development. In G. B. Kleiner (Ed.), Strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya: vyzovy i perspektivy [Strategies of Spatial Development: Challenges and Prospects] (pp. 21–37). Ekaterinburg: Institute
of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS. https://doi.org/10.17059/rec-2025-2 (In Russ.)
Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ivanov, O. B., & Buchwald, E. M. (2024). Economic Space as a Potential for the Sustainable Development. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika [ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, Practice], (1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6435-2024-1-34-52 (In Russ.)
Izotov, D. A. (2021). Trade Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region: Decomposition of Effects. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 17(1), 66–96. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2021.1.066-096 (In Russ.)
Jones, M., & Woods, M. (2012). New localities. Regional Studies, 47(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.709612
Kakaulina M. O., & Gorlov D. R. (2022). Assessment of the Impact of Tax Incentives on Investment Activity in Special Economic Zones of the Russian Federation. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 21(2), 282–324. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.011 (In Russ.)
Khmeleva, G. A., Koroleva, E. N., & Kurnikova, M. V. (2019). Smart specialization strategy: European experience and lessons for Russia. Vestnik Samarskogo munitsipal′nogo instituta upravleniya [Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Institute of Management], (3), 35–45. (In Russ.)
Khuzina, A. F., & Rubanov, I. O. (2025). Assessment of preferential regimes as a fiscal mechanism for stimulating territories and regions. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law], (7-2), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.4265 (In Russ.)
Kleiner, G. B. (2023). Mesoeconomic Face of Russian Economy. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdeniye Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], (3(77)), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-3-77-6-9 (In Russ.)
Kleiner, G. B. (Ed.). (2010). Mezoehkonomika razvitiya [Mesoeconomics of Development]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 994. (In Russ.)
Kleiner, G. B. (Ed.). (2011). Mezoehkonomika razvitiya razvitiya [Mesoeconomics of Development]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 804. (In Russ.)
Kotov, A. V. (2022). Efficiency Assessment of Preferential Treatment at the Municipal Level. Voprosy Territorial’nogo Razvitiya [Territorial Development Issues], 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2022.1.61.1 (In Russ.)
Kotov, A. V. (2024). Strategicheskoye prostranstvennoye razvitiye v yevropeyskom soyuze [Strategic Spatial Development in the European Union]. Moscow: RAS, 424. (In Russ.)
Lenntrop, B. (2008). Innovation diffusion as spatial process (1953): Törsten Hägerstrand. In P. Hubbard, R. Kitchin, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key texts in human geography (pp. 1–9). SAGE Publications.
Leonov, S. N. (2020). Preferential Regimes of Established Local Growth Points and its Impact on the Economy of the Far East. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 13(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.3 (In Russ.)
Lesh, A. (2007). Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya khozyaystva [Spatial Organization of the Economy]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
Maevskaya, L. I. (2024). Preferential Economic Zones: Potential Opportunities and Ways of their Implementation in the Context of Sanctions Policy. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow], 14(1A), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2024.37.14.055 (In Russ.)
Mayevsky, V. I., & Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (Eds.). (2020). Mezoehkonomika: elementy novoy paradigm [Mesoeconomics: Elements of a New Paradigm]. Мoscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 392. (In Russ.)
Markwart E., Kiseleva, N. N., & Sosnin, D. P. (2022). The System of Central (Reference) Settlements as a Management Tool: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Vlast’ [The Authority], 30(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i2.8939 (In Russ.)
Minakir, P. A. (2017). “Turn to the East” Policy: Expectations and Reality. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 13(4), 1016–1029. https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-4-4 (In Russ.)
Odintsova, A. V. (2023). Preferential Territories in the Spatial Development of the Russian Federation. Federalizm [Federalism], 28(2), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-2-27-46 (In Russ.)
Odintsova, A. V. (2025). Anchor Settlements — New Priority of Spatial Development of the Russian Federation. Federalizm [Federalism], 30(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2025-1-52-70 (In Russ.)
Pechatkin, V. V. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Creating and Developing Industrial Parks in Russian Regions. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ [Economic Security], 7(11), 2873-2886. https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.7.11.122166 (In Russ.)
Plesovskikh, A. E. (2023). Special Economic Zones of Russia: Forecasting Decisions of Potential Residents and Resident Generation Process Modeling. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 22(2), 323–354. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.2.014 (In Russ.)
Podsitkova, K. I., & Pronyaeva, L. I. (2020). Territories of Advancing Development to Increase Investment Attractiveness of the Region. Ekonomicheskaya sreda [Economic environment], (4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.36683/2306-1758/2020.04/4-12 (In Russ.)
Rogers, E. M. (1976). New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1086/208642
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.).
Romanova, O. A., & Galiullina, G. F. (2024). The New Role of Preferential Territories in the Technological and Spatial Development of Russia. AlterEconomics, 21(4), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-4.2 (In Russ.)
Romanova, O. A., & Galiullina, G. F. (2025). Assessing Business Appeal of Priority Development Territories. EKO [ECO], (5), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2025-5-59-77 (In Russ.)
Roy, O. M., & Bichun, V. S. (2025). Reference Settlement in the Context of Russia’s New Spatial Strategy. Munitsipal’naya akademiya [Municipal Academy], (3), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.52176/2304831X_2025_03_81 (In Russ.)
Sokolova, S. V. (2024). The Origins of Self-Organization of Urban Agglomerations. Munitsipal’naya
akademiya [Municipal Academy], (3), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.52176/2304831X_2024_03_270 (In Russ.)
Sorokina, N. Yu. (2023). Strategies for the Development of Preferential Territories in the System of Strategic Planning Documents in Russia. Nauchnyye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika [Scientific Research and Development. Economics], 11(5), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-5-46-50 (In Russ.)
Sycheva, I. N., Engoyan, O. Z., Bolkhovitina, E. N., & Zakharenkova, A. N. (2025). The concept of a territory’s framework: Economic and non-economic parameters. Grand Altai Research & Education, (2). EDN DGNMHL (In Russ.)
Trifonov, V. A. (2025a). Choosing a preferential treatment for the Development of the regional economic space. Voprosy regional’noy ekonomiki [Issues of Regional Economy], (2), 181–193. (In Russ.)
Trifonov, V. A. (2025b). Formation of technopolises: The importance of preferential regimes in the scientific and technological development of Russian regions. Ekonomika nauki [Economics of Science], 11(4), 75–89. (In Russ.)
Valente, W. T. (1995). Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Hampton Press.
Vasilieva, E. Yu., & Sokolov, A. V. (2023). Efficiency of Preferential Regimes in Modern Russian Conditions. Upravlencheskiy uchet [Management Accounting], (2), 348–356. (In Russ.)
Vilenskiy, A. V. (2025). Unity of the National Economic Space and Preferential Economic Zones. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], (5), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_5_46_64 (In Russ.)
JATS