DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.7
For citation:
Volchik, V. V. & Maskaev, A. I. (2021). Narrative Economics and Qualitative Studies of the Russian Innovation System. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18(4), 570-583. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.7
Abstract:
Narrative economics holds a vast potential since it can expand the array of questions and data covered by the analysis of economic change. The ideas that narratives contain reflect the actors’ perceptions of the rules structuring recurring interactions. Therefore, analysis of popular narratives can provide valuable insights into the relevant rules and behaviour patterns in their relation to the social context.
In this study, we identified the most significant sources containing narratives and selected the most relevant narratives with biographical elements. The biographical method implies that narratives about events and phenomena are examined by looking at the actors’ biographical stories. Our research aims to test the applicability of the biographical method within the narrative economics approach to study the Russian innovation system. The analysis has revealed the most widely spread ideas associated with rules and institutions, such as researchers’ dependence on the funds that the government or companies are willing to invest in their studies. Another problem is the production of the next generation of academic workforce in Russia. We systematized the problem situations linked to the spreading of narratives and found that they are related to the setbacks in the state management of the Russian innovation system. We conducted a qualitative study of narratives combined with quantitative content analysis. The changing frequency of the key words and phrases reflects the dynamics of narratives and shows their ‘viral’ quality.
Further analysis and systematization of qualitative data on innovation systems will create a better understanding of complex non-ergodic processes. It would also be productive to analyze official documents on the current rules and institutional development and compare the results with the evidence obtained through the narrative approach.
Brockmeier, J. & Harre, R. (2000). Narrativ: problemy i obeshchaniya odnoy al’ternativnoy paradigm [Narrative: Problems and Promises of an Alternative Paradigm]. Voprosy filosofii [Russian Studies in Philosophy], 3, 29–42. (In Russ.)
Bookstaber, R. (2021). Radikal’naya neopredelennost’: manifest o prirode ekonomicheskikh krizisov, ikh prognozirovanii i preodolenii [The End of Theory: Financial Crises, the Failure of Economics, and the Sweep of Human Interaction]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 304. (In Russ.)
Volchik, V. V. (2017). Narrativnaya i institutsional’naya ekonomika [Narrative and Institutional Economics]. Journal of Institutional Studies, 9(4), 132–143. (In Russ.)
Volchik, V. V. (2020). Narrativy i ponimaniye ekonomicheskikh institutov [Narratives and understanding of economic institutions]. Terra Economicus, 18(2), 49–69. DOI: 10.18522/2073–6606–2020–18–2-49–69. (In Russ.)
Godin, B. (2010). Kontseptual’nyye osnovy nauchnoy, tekhnologicheskoy i innovatsionnoy politiki [Conceptual Frameworks of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy]. Forsayt [Foresight-Russia], 4(2), 34–43. (In Russ.)
Golichenko, O. (2014). Natsional’naya innovatsionnaya sistema: ot kontseptsii k metodologii issledovaniya [National Innovation Systems: From Conception toward the Methodology of Analysis]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Voprosy Ekonomiki], 7, 35–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-35-50. (In Russ.)
Zaslavskaya, T. I. (2002). O sotsial’nykh faktorakh raskhozhdeniya formal’no-pravovykh norm i real’nykh praktik [On the social factors of the discrepancy between formal legal norms and real practices]. Kuda idet Rossiya [Where is Russia going]. Мoscow, Russia: MVSHSEN, 11–21. (In Russ.)
Collier, P. (2021). Budushcheye kapitalizma [The Future of Capitalism: Facing the New Anxieties]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaydara, 376. (In Russ.)
Lekhtsier, V. (2013). Narrativnyy povorot i aktual’nost’ narrativnogo razuma [Narrative Turn and the Actuality of the Narrative Mind]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovaniy kul’tury [International Journal of Cultural Research], 1(10), 5–8. (In Russ.)
Malinovsky, B. N. (1993). Akademik V. Glushkov. Stranitsy zhizni i tvorchestva [Academician V. Glushkov. Pages of life and creativity]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka. (In Russ.)
Rozhdestvenskaya, E. Yu. (2012). Biograficheskiy metod v sotsiologii [Biographical method in sociology]. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 381. (In Russ.)
Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma [Critique of Cynical Reason]. Ekaterinburg, Russia: U-Faktoriya, 798. (In Russ.)
Shiriaev, I. M., Kurysheva, A. A. & Volchik, V. V. (2021). Narrativnyy institutsional’’nyy analiz I rossiyskaya innovatsionnaya sistema [Narrative institutional analysis and the national innovation system in Russia]. Journal of Institutional Studies, 13(3), 81–101. DOI: 10.17835/2076–6297.2021.13.3.081–101 (In Russ.)
Foucalt, M. (2012). Arkheologiya znaniya [The archaeology of knowledge]. St Petersburg, Russia: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya», 415. (In Russ.)
Akerlof, G. A. & Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 58–71. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021.
Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London; New York: Routledge, 190.
Ciborowski, R. W. & Skrodzka, I. (2020). International technology transfer and innovative changes adjustment in EU. Empirical Economics, 59(3), 1351–1371.
Di Donato, F. (2019). The Analysis of Legal Cases: a narrative approach. London: Routledge, 322. DOI:10.4324/9781315223087.
Foucault, M. (2012). Arkheologiya znaniya [The Archeology of Knowledge]. St Petersburg, Russia: ITS “Gumanitarnaya Akademiya”, 415. (In Russ.)
Godin, B. (2007). National Innovation System: The System Approach in Historical Perspective. Project on the History and Sociology of STI Statistics. Working Paper, 36.
Johnson, A. (2001). Functions in innovation system approaches. Nelson and Winter Conference. Aalborg, Denmark, 12–15.
Khalatur, S., Khaminich, S., Budko, O., Dubovych, O. & Karamushka, O. (2020). Multiple system of innovation-investment decisions adoption with synergetic approach usage. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2745–2763.
Kreiswirth, M. (1992). Trusting the Tale: The Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences. New Literary History, 23(3), 629–657. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/469223.
Kuhlmann, S. & Arnold, E. (2001). RCN in the Norwegian Research and Innovation System. Background Report No. 12 in the evaluation of the Research Council of Norway. Karlsruhe, Brighton: Fraunhofer ISI, Technopolis, 43.
Lejano, R. P. & Nero, S. J. (2020). The Power of Narrative: Climate Skepticism and the Deconstruction of Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 204. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197542101.001.0001.
Lundvall, B. Å. (2016). Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national systems of innovation. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. London, New York: Anthem Press, 61–84.
Markey-Towler, B. (2019). Rules, perception and emotion: When do institutions determine behaviour? Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(3), 381–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000267.
Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. In Stoneman P. (Eds.). London: Blackwell Publishers, 409–512.
Nelson, R. R. (1993). A Retrospective. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. In Nelson R. R. (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 505–523.
North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development, 17(9), 1319–1332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90075-2.
Patel, P. & Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovations Systems. STI-Review, 14, 9–32.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373.
Popper, S. W. et al. (2020). China’s Propensity for Innovation in the 21st Century: Identifying Indicators of Future Outcomes. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA208-1.
Reijers, W. & Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). Narrative and Technology Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 214. DOI:10.1007/978–3-030–60272–7.
Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Buckingham: Open university press, 212.
Rouse, J. (2007). Practice theory. Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, 639–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451542-1/50020-9.
Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative Economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967–1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.4.967.
Shiller, R. J. (2019a). Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(3), 477–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.03.015.
Shiller, R. J. (2019b). Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Event. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdf0jm5.
Shiller, R. J. (2020). Popular economic narratives advancing the longest U.S. expansion 2009–2019. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(4), 791–798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.03.005.
Shiller, R. J. (2021). Animal spirits and viral popular narratives. Review of Keynesian Economics, 9(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ROKE.2021.01.01.
Volchik, V. V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus, 18(2), 49–69. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-49-69.
Warnke, P. et al. (2016). Opening up the innovation system framework towards new actors and institutions. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers — Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 49. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. Retrieved from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0011-n-3829280. (Date of access: 15.08.2021).
Wu, J., Zhuo, S., & Wu, Z. (2017). National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 238–250.