2021 (18), №4

Is There a Link Between Complementary Economic Institutions and Ideologies?

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.2

For citation: 

Volynskii, A. I. (2021). Is There a Link Between Complementary Economic Institutions and Ideologies? Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18(4), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.2

Abstract:

Since the publication of Max Weber’s “Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism” in 1904, the author’s idea about the positive relationship between Protestantism and capitalism has taken root in social sciences. Even though since then, multiple authors have questioned Weber’s idea, it still remains popular. Douglass C. North’s theory of institutions is interesting in this respect. He pointed to the intentionality behind the emergence of institutions. For North, institutions are an attempt to reduce the uncertainty by providing a structure to our everyday life, including interactions. The forms of these interactions depend not only on the climatic, demographic, technological and other factors, but also on people’s ethical attitudes. In our study, we proceed from the assumption that there is a relationship between institutions and ideologies in the broad sense of the term, on the one hand, and, on the other, from the concept of complementary institutions. The latter implies the presence in the institutional environment of two or more complementary institutions. Complementary institutions determine the structure of contractual relations between agents pursuing simple tasks, which means that there are various systems of stimuli and principles of how these agents should deliver on their obligations. In this respect the question arises as to how such institutional complementarity fit into the ideologies prevailing in this or that society? Is it possible for complementary institutions to coexist? In this study we focus on two cases from Chinese history to show that institutional complementarity is possible only if the adherents to the dominant ideology are ready to accept the possibility of flexible interpretations of such ideology and of the existence of complementary ideologies. The first example is the popularity of Taoism as a complementary ideology of Confucianism among the merchants in Qing China. Since Confucianism could not create the necessary ethical incentives for those people who were engaged in trade, Taoism filled the ethical void with its magical practices. The second case relates to the era of the Han Dynasty and the dispute about the limits of the state’s influence on the economy between the representatives of different philosophical schools. In both examples, complementary ideology creates necessary incentives for building complementary institutions.

PDF full
Downloaded: 48

Andrei I. Volynskii — Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS; http://orcid.org/0000–0002–6786–8870 (32, Nakhimovskiy Prospect, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation; e-mail: ava3003@hotmail.com).

Arslanov, V. V. (2020). Religiya kak nezavisimaya peremennaya. Ekonometricheskie issledovaniya Reformatsii [Religion as an independent variable. econometric studies of the reformation].  Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 4(9),  49–70. (In Russ.)

Blaug, M. (1994).  Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v retrospective [Economic theory in retropect].  4th Edition. Moscow, Russia: “Delo Ltd”, 720. (In Russ.)

Wallerstein, I. (2016).  Mir-sistema Moderna. Tom I. Kapitalisticheskoe sel’skoe khozyaystvo i istoki evropeyskogo mira-ekonomiki v XVI veke [The Modern World-System I. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century].  Preface by G. M. Derlug’yan. Translated, edited, commented by N. Protsenko, A. Chernyaev. 2nd Edition. Moscow, Russia: Russkiy fond sodeystviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 552. (In Russ.)

Weber, M. (2017).  Khozyaystvennaya etika mirovykh religii. Opyty sravnitel’noy sotsiologii religii. Konfutsianstvo i daosizm [The Economic Ethics of World Religions. Confucianism, Taoism].  Translated from German by O. V. Kil’dyushov. St Petersburg, Russia: Vladimir Dal’, 446. (In Russ.)

Greif, A. (2013).  Instituty i put’ k sovremennoy ekonomike. Uroki srednevekovoi torgovli [Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Lessons from Medieval Trade].  Translated from English by I. Kushnareva. Openning article by M. Yudkevich. HSE University. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of HSE University, 536. (In Russ.)

Broadberry, S. & O’ Rourke, K. (Eds.) (2013).  Kembridzhskaya ekonomicheskaya istoriya Evropy Novogo i Noveyshego vremeni. Tom 1: 1700–1870 [The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Europe. Volume 1: 1700–1780].  Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of Gaydar’s Institutions, 464. (In Russ.)

Kirdina, S. G. (2014).  Institutsional’nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii: vvedenie v X-Y-teoriyu [The Institutional Matrix and the Developments of Russia: an Introduction to X-Y theory].  3rd Edition, pererabotannoe, rasshirennoe i illyustrirovannoe. St Petersburg, Russia: Nestor-Istoriya, 468. (In Russ.)

Kirdina, S. G., Kuznetsova, A. V. & Sen’ko, O. V. (2015). Klimat i institutsional’nye matritsy: mezhstranovoy analiz [Climate and institutional matrices: cross-country analysis].  Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 9,  3–13. (In Russ.)

Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. & Kruglova, M. S. (2019). “Obshchestvo”, “gosudarstvo” i institutsional’nye matritsy: opyt mezhdistsiplinarnogo mezoanaliza [“Society”, “State” and Institutional Matrixes: a Case in Interdisciplinary Meso-Analysis].  Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 10,  15–26. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007101–4. (In Russ.)

 Kniga pravitelya oblasti Shan (Shan tszyun’ shchu) [The book of Lord Shang].  (1993). 2nd Edition. Translated by L. S. Perelomov. Moscow, Russia: Ladomir, 392.

Kozhin, P. M. (2007). Kitayskiy buddizm [Chinese Buddhism].  Dukhovnaya kul’tura Kitaya: entsiklopediya: v 5 t. T. 2. Mifologiya. Religiya [Spiritual culture of China: Encyclopedia: in 5 vols. Vol. 2. Mythology. Religion].  Chief-Editor: M. L. Titarenko; In M. L. Titarenko et al. (Eds.). Moscow, Russia: East lit., 260–268. (In Russ.)

 Konfutsianskoe “Chetveroknizhie” (“Sy shu”) [Four Books (Si Shu)] (2004).  Translated and commented by A. I. Kobzev, A. E. Luk’yanov, L. S. Perelomov, P. S. Popov with the involvement V. M. Mayorova. Introductory statement of L. S. Perelomov. Institute of Far East. Moscow, Russia: East lit., 431. (In Russ.)

Korovin, G. B., & Krokhina, E. A. (2017). Komplementarnye instituty finansirovaniya regional’noy ekonomiki [Complementary institutions for funding regional economies].  Finansy: teoriya i praktika [Finance: theory and practice], 21(4),  30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2587–5671–2017–21–4-30–39. (In Russ.)

Laval, Ch. (2010).  Chelovek ekonomicheskiy. Esse o proiskhozhdenii neoliberalizma [An economic person. An essay on the origin of Neoliberalism].  Translated from French by S. Ryndin. Moscow, Russia: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 430. (In Russ.)

Maspero, A. (2007).  Daosizm [Taoism].  Translated from French by V. Yu. Bystrov. In S. V. Pakhomov (Eds.). St Petersburg, Russia: Nauka, 294. (In Russ.)

Mayorov, V. M. (2016). Khronika politicheskikh sobytiy [Chronicle of political events].  Istoriya Kitaya s drevneyshikh vremen do nachala XXI veka: v 10 tomakh. T. II. Epokha Chzhan’go, Tsin’ i Khan’ (V v. do n.e. — III v n.e.) [History of China from ancient times to the beginning of the XXI century: in 10 volumes. Vol. II. The era of Zhanguo, Qin and Han (V century BC — III century AD)].  Chief-Editor L. S. Perelomov. IFES RAS. Moscow, Russia: Nauka — Vost., 239–257. (In Russ.)

Mokyr, J. (2014).  Rychag bogatstva. Tekhnologicheskaya kreativnost’ i ekonomicheskoy progress [The lever of riches: Technological Creativity and economic Progress].  Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 504. (In Russ.)

North, D. (2010).  Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [Understanding the process of economic change].  Translated from English by K. Martynov, N. Edel’man. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of HSE University, 256. (In Russ.)

North, D., Wallis, J. & Weingast, B. (2011).  Nasilie i sotsial’nye poryadki. Kontseptual’nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis’mennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders. A conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History].  Translated by D. Uzlaner, M. Markov, D. Raskov, A. Raskovoy. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 480. (In Russ.)

Parsons, T. (1993). Ponyatie obshchestva: komponenty i ikh vzaimootnosheniya [The concept of society: the components and their interrelations].  THESIS, 2,  94–122. (In Russ.)

Pierson, Ch. (2020).  Prosto sobstvennost’: ee istoriya na latinskom Zapade: v 2 t. T. 1: Bogatstvo, dobrodetel’ i parvo [Just Property. A History in the Latin West. In 2 Volumes. Volume One: Wealth, Virtue, and the Law].  Moscow, Russia: Izdatel’skiy dom “Delo” RANKhiGS, 520. (In Russ.)

Pey, Chan-khun (2009). Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ [Economic thought].  Dukhovnaya kul’tura Kitaya: entsiklopediya: v 5 t. [Spiritual Culture of China: Encyclopedia in 5 volumes].  In M. L. Titarenko (Eds.). IFES RAS. Moscow, Russia: East Literature, 2006–2010. Vol. 5: Nauka, tekhnicheskaya i voennaya mysl’, zdravookhranenie i obrazovanie [Science, technical and military thought, health and education]. In M. L. Titarenko et al. (Eds.), 576–585. (In Russ.)

Robbins, L. (2013).  Istoriya ekonomicheskoy mysli: lektsii v Londonskoy shkole ekonomiki [A History of Economic Thought: The LSE Lectures].  Translated by N. V. Avtonomova. In V. S. Avtonomov (Eds.). Moscow, Russia: Publishing House the Gaidar Institute, 493. (In Russ.)

Said, E. (2006).  Orientalizm [Orientalism].  Moscow, Russia: Russkiy Mir, 636. (In Russ.)

Studentsov, V. B. (2019). Perechityvaya «Protestantskuyu etiku» Maksa Vebera: voprosy, somneniya, vozrazheniya [Rereading Max Weber’s “Protestant Ethic”: Questions, Doubts, and Objections].  Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(1),  130–143. (In Russ.)

Sushentsova, M. S., Miroshnichenko, M. A. & Lymar, F. A. (2021). Marksizm i liberalizm o spravedlivosti: filosofskoe obosnovanie i ekonomicheskaya interpretatsiya [Justice problem with Marxist and liberal approaches: philosophical justification and economic interpretation].  Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii [Russian journal of economic theory], 18(1),  116–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-1.8. (In Russ.)

Sima, Qian (1986).  Istoricheskie zapiski (Shi tszi) [The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji)].  Translated from Chinese by R. V. Vyatkin. Moscow, Russia: Izd-vo “Nauka”, 453. (In Russ.)

Tambovtsev, V. L. (2020). Metodologiya empiricheskogo analiza neformal’nykh institutov [Methodology for Empirical Analysis of Informal Institutions].  Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(3),  6–23. (In Russ.)

Huan, Kuan (2001).  Spor o soli i zheleze (Yan’ te lun’) [The Discourses on Salt and Iron (Yán Tiě Lùn)].  Vol. 1. Translated from Chinese by Yu L. Krol’. Moscow, Russia: Publishing firm “Vostochnaya literature” RAN, 407. (In Russ.)

Shumpeter, J. (2012). Nauka i ideologiya [Science and Ideology].  Filosofiya ekonomiki. Antologiya [The Philosophy of Economics].  Translated from English. In D. Hausman (Eds.). Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute, 247–264. (In Russ.)

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. (2012).  Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty.  New York: Crown Publishers, 571.

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. (2021). Non-Modernization: Power-Culture Trajectories and the Dynamics of Political Institutions.  NBER Working Paper,  29007.

Akerlof, G. & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and Identity.  Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3),  715–753.

Amable, B. (2016). Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism.  Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(1),  79–103. DOI:10.1017/S1744137415000211.

Aoki, M. (1996). Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis: motivations and some tentative theorizing.  Japanese Economic Review, 47(1),  1–19.

Aoki, M. (2001).  Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis.  Cambridge: MIT Press, 468.

Bo, Stråth (2013). Ideology and Conceptual History.  The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies.  In Michael Freeden and Marc Stears (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–37.

Chen, Jie (2013).  A Middle Class without Democracy: Economic Growth and the Prospects for Democratization in China.  New York: Oxford University Press, 210.

Cranston, Maurice.  Ideology. Britanica.  Retrieved from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ideology-society/The-philosophical-context (Date of access: 15.08.2021).

Freeden, M. (2013). The Morphological Analysis of Ideology.  The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies.  In Freeden M., Sargent L. T., Stears M. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–137.

Gagliardi, F. (2013). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Institutional Complementarities.  EAEPE Annual Conference.

Hofstede, G. (2001).  Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations.  Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 596.

Hu Xiang Ming & Yang Xiao Ming (2020). The Characteristics of the Typical Pattern of Jin-merchant Culture and Its Use in Traditional Decorative Design.  Asian Social Science, 16(6),  34–36.

Huang, Hua-Lun & Wang, John Zheng (2002). From Religious Cult to Criminal Gang: The Evolution of Chinese Triads (Part 1).  Journal of Gang Research, 9(4),  25–32.

Hunt, L. (1984).  Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution.  Berkeley: University of California Press, 251.

Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005).  Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence.  Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 333.

Jianhui, Fengj (2008). A study of escaping trade and embracing Confucianism of Huizhou merchant during Ming and Qing dynasty Focusing on the Zheng family of Changling Shexian.  Journal of Huangshan University, 4,  19–26. (In Chinese)

Kwan, Man Bun (2001).  The Salt Merchants of Tianjin: State-Making and Civil Society in Late Imperial China.  Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 256.

Laclau, E. (1996). Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Eds.).  Deconstruction and Pragmatism.  London: Routledge, 47–68.

Mokyr, J. (2017).  A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy.  Princeton: Princeton University Press, 403.

Mullins, W. (1972). On the Concept of Ideology in Political Science.  American Political Science Review, 66(2),  498–510. DOI:10.2307/1957794.

Pomeranz, К. (2000).  The great divergence: China, Europe and the making of the modern world economy.  Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 392.

Turner, B. (2017). Ideology and Post-structuralism after Bernard Stiegler.  Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1)  92–110. DOI: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1253135.

Weber, M. (1904). Die protestantische Ethik und der „Geist“ des Kapitalismus.  Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20(1),  1–54.

Wright, J. (2008). Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment.  American Journal of Political Science, 52(2),  322–343.

Wu, G. (2010).  Zheng Guanying: Merchant Reformer of Late Qing China and His Influence on Economics, Politics, and Society.  Amherst, NY: Cambria Press, 304.

Zhang, Yichi (2020). From ‘Arcadia of the literati’ to ‘extravagant enclosure’: the Tianjin salt merchant gardens of the Qing Dynasty.  Landscape Research, 45(7),  789–801.

Zhu, J. S. & Nyland, C. (2017). Chinese employer associations, institutional complementarity and countervailing power.  Work, Employment and Society, 31(2),  284–301. DOI:10.1177/0950017016643480.