2021 (18) , №1

Institutional Structure of Corporations (the Case of Large Russian Corporations)

For citation: 

Pletnev, D. A., & Kozlova, E. V. (2021). Institutional Structure of Corporations (the Case of Large Russian Corporations). Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18(1), 87-102, https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-1.6


Modern corporation is the main form of social production but its activity and development still remain a largely underexplored question. Economic theory predominantly relies on simplified approaches based on mathematical modeling to study corporations, which gives us little in-depth understanding of the essence of this phenomenon. On the other hand, applied research on corporations does not rise to the level of theoretically significant generalizations. This paper proposes the following theoretical and methodological approach to analyzing the phenomenon of corporation: we identify institutional elements in its structure — institutions and routines. We use the cases of the largest Russian companies to demonstrate the possibility of using this approach to analyze specific corporations and their aggregates. The paper describes nine different routines that structure corporate actors’ interactions based on social norms, coercion, and private interest. We also conduct an analysis of the official sites of Russian corporations and sites with employee feedback, which leads us to evaluating each institution’s development from the triad: coercion, assistance, and opportunism. We found a significant correlation between the development level of each corporation’s institutional structure and its efficiency (profitability of sales and capitalization growth rate).

PDF full
Downloaded: 7

Dmitriy A. Pletnev — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sector and Market, Chelyabinsk State University (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: pletnev@csu.ru).

Elena V. Kozlova — Senior Lecturer, Department of Economic Sector and Market, Chelyabinsk State University (Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation; e-mail: kozlova@csu.ru).

Bakan, J. (2007).  Korporatsiya: patologicheskaya pogonya za pribyl’yu i vlast’yu [The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power].  Moscow: Vil’yams, 288. (In Russ.)

Barhatov, V. I., & Pletnev, D. A. (2013a). Osobennosti proyavleniya opportunizma v rossiyskikh mashinostroitel’nykh korporatsiyakh [Opportunism manifestation in the Russian machine building corporations].  Organizator proizvodstva [Organizer of Production], 2(57),  15–20. (In Russ.)

Barhatov, V. I., & Pletnev, D. A. (2013b). Innovatsionnaya disfunktsiya sovremennoy korporatsii: vliyanie institutsional’noy struktury [Innovative dysfunction of a modern corporation: the influence of the institutional structure].  Materialy Shestnadtsatykh Drukerovskikh chteniy [Proceedings of the Sixteenth Drucker readings].  Moscow, 165–173. (In Russ.)

Belkin, V. N., Belkina, N.A., & Antonova, O. A. (2015). Opportunisticheskoe povedenie rabotnikov rossiyskikh predpriyatiy [Opportunistic behaviour of employees of the Russian enterprises].  Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University],18(373),  105–113. (In Russ.)

Buzgalin, A. V., & Kolganov, A., I. (2020). Rynok i sobstvennost’: social’no-jekonomicheskie uroki pandemii [Market and property: socio-economic lessons of the pandemia].  Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 8,  145–157. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009711–5 (In Russ.)

Werner, K., & Weiss, H. (2007).  Chernaya kniga korporatsiy [The Black Book of Corporations].  Ekaterinburg, Russia: Ul’tra. Kul’tura, 416. (In Russ.)

Gamidullaeva, L. A. (2016). Instituty v razvitii innovatsionnykh sistem [Institutions in the development of innovation systems].  Journal of Economic Regulation, 7(1),  93–103. DOI: 10.17835/2078–5429.2016.7.1.093–103. (In Russ.)

Monks, R. (2010).  Korpokratiya: kak general’nye direktora pribirayut k rukam milliony dollarov [Corpocracy: How CEOs and the Business Roundtable Hijacked the World’s Greatest Wealth Machine — And How to Get It Back].  Moscow: Yunayted Press, 238. (In Russ.)

Pletnev, D. A. (2013a). Sistemno-institutsional’naya teoriya korporatsii: k razrabotke novoy kontseptsii [The systematic institutional theory of the corporation: towards a new conceptualization].  Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii [Economics of contemporary Russia], 4(63),  7–18. (In Russ.)

Pletnev, D. A. (2013b). Sushchnost’ i priroda rutin vovlecheniya v strukture instituta sodeystviya korporatsii [The essence and nature of the routines of involvement in the structure of corporation’s institution of assistance].  Terra Economicus, 11(1),  47–56. (In Russ.)

Pletnev, D. A. (2018). Budushchee korporatsii v postkapitalisticheskuyu epokhu [The future of corporation in the post-capitalist era].  Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 8(418),  169–173. (In Russ.)

Pletnev, D. A., & Nikolaeva, E. V. (2016). Patterny instituta sodeystviya v sovremennykh rossiyskikh korporatsiyakh [Patterns of institution of assistance in modern Russian corporations].  Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University], 2 (384),  151–161. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2016). Pozitivnoe sotrudnichestvo: faktory i mekhanizmy evolyutsii [Positive Collaboration: Factors and Mechanisms of Evolution].  Voprosy Ekonomiki [Economic Issues], 11,  5–23. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2016–11–5-23. (In Russ.)

Popov, E. V. (2015).  Instituty [Institutions].  Ekaterinburg, Russia: Institute of Economics (Ural branch of RAS), 712. (In Russ.)

Radaev, V. V. (1998).  Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. Kurs lektsiy: ucheb. posobie [Economic Sociology].  Moscow: Aspekt Press, 368. (In Russ.)

Semler, R. (2007).  Maverik. Istoriya uspekha samoy neobychnoy kompanii v mire [Maverick: The Success Story Behind the World’s Most Unusual Workplace].  Moscow: Dobraya kniga, 404. (In Russ.)

Sukharev, O. S. (2018). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya institutsional’nykh izmeneniy: podkhody k modelirovaniyu korrektsii i disfunktsii institutov [Economic Theory of Institutional Changes: Approaches to Modeling Corrections and Dysfunctions of Institutions].  Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 15(2),  276–290. DOI 10.31063/2073–6517/2018.15–2.12. (In Russ.)

Tambovtsev, V. L. (2005).  Ekonomicheskaya teoriya institutsional’nykh izmeneniy [The Economic theory of institutional change].  Moscow, Russia: Moscow State University, 542. (In Russ.)

Bezold, C. et al. (1986).  The future of Work and Health.  Dover-London: Auburn House.

Galtung, J. (1968). Small Group Theory and the Theory of International Relations. A Study In isomorphism.  New Approaches to International Relations.  In Kaplan, M. (Eds.). N.Y., 270–295.

Hindriks, F., & Gouala, F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: a unified theory.  Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3),  459–480. DOI:10.1017/S1744137414000496.

Hodgson, G. (2006). What Are Institutions?  Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1),  1–25. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879.

Hodgson, G. (2019). Taxonomic definitions in social science, with firms, markets and institutions as case studies.  Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(2),  207–233. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000334.

Loasby, B. (2015). Ronald Coase’s theory of the firm and the scope of economics.  Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(2),  245–264. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137414000265.

North, D. C. (2017). Institutions and economics.  A Companion to Cognitive Science,  713–721. DOI:10.1002/9781405164535.ch57.

North, D. C. (2004). Partnership as a Means to Improve Economic Performance.  Evaluation and development: The partnership dimension World Bank series on evaluation and development,  3–8. DOI: 10.4324/9781351323925–2.

Pletnev, D. A. (2018). The New Governance Paradigm for Firms Based on Institutions.  Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238,  388–397.

Polterovich, V. (2018). Towards a general theory of social and economic development: Evolution of coordination mechanisms.  Russian Journal of Economics, 4(4),  346–385. DOI: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.33621.

Popov, E., & Simonova, V. (2006). Forms of opportunism between principals and agents.  International Advances in Economic Research, 12(1),  115–123. DOI: 10.1007/s11294–006–6140–0.

Shiozawa, Y. (2004). Evolutionary Economics in the 21st Century: A Manifesto.  Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1(1),  5–47. DOI: 10.14441/eier.1.5.

Vanek, J. (2011). Capitalism, Economic Democracy, and Ecological Destruction of Our Planet.  Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor Managed Firms.  Emerald Group Publ. Ltd., 289–298.

Williamson, O. (2011) Why institutions matter: [reprint of a letter from Oliver Williamson to the KIEA on the occasion of the conference].  Institutional Economics and National Competitiveness,  2011, xx-xxi.