2026 (23). №1

Innovative Development Programs for State-Owned Companies as a Tool for Developing Russia’s National Innovation System

For citation: 

Vologova, Yu. V. (2026). Innovative Development Programs for State-Owned Companies as a Tool for Developing Russia’s National Innovation System. AlterEconomics, 23(1), 190–209.   https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2026.23-1.11

Abstract:

This article analyzes innovative development programs for state-owned companies and their role in shaping Russia’s national innovation system, particularly in the context of global strategic challenges and the pursuit of technological sovereignty. The study introduces a tiered analytical framework for assessing development opportunities within the national innovation system at three levels: subsystem, system, and suprasystem. It also examines how innovative development programs have evolved as a policy instrument capable of influencing each of these levels. First, the article identifies key areas of innovation policy at each development level and highlights those that can be implemented through these programs. Second, it compares actual program outcomes with the levels at which they were implemented. The analysis shows that such programs have evolved from addressing subsystem-level challenges — the innovative development of state-owned companies themselves — to tackling suprasystem-level goals, including technological sovereignty and national technological leadership. Third, based on the results of program implementation across these levels, the study provides recommendations to improve their effectiveness. These include expanding project-based approaches to R&D planning with the aim of achieving market leadership, creating a system for managing unused domestic innovations, and formalizing collaboration with the international science and education sector. Finally, the article examines current conditions affecting Russia’s innovation development, particularly the disruption of suprasystem-level connections in the national innovation system. It identifies systemic functions of innovative development programs that can help address challenges beyond the scope of existing national projects.

Здесь вставить шорт-код (стрелочка вниз на панели инструментов) с адресом файла

Yuliya V. Vologova — Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8556-5858  (32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, 117218, Moscow, Russian Federation, 117218; e-mail: yuliya-vologova@yandex.ru).

Afanasyev, A. (2025). The national project of technological leadership as a tool for the development of domestic machine tool industry. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], (11), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034543X25110034  (In Russ.)

Dementiev, V. E. (2024). Technological sovereignty and economic interests. Journal of Institutional Studies, 16 (3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.3.006-018  (In Russ.)

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Gareev, T. R. (2023). Technological sovereignty: From conceptual contradiction to practical implementation. Terra Economicus, 21 (4), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-38-54  (In Russ.)

Golichenko, O. G. (2006). Natsional’naya innovatsionnaya sistema Rossii: sostoyaniye i puti razvitiya [National innovation system of Russia: Current state and growth prospects]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 396. (In Russ.)

Golichenko, O. G. (2011). Osnovnyye faktory razvitiya natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy: uroki dlya Rossii [The main factors of the development of the national innovation system: Lessons for Russia]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 634. (In Russ.)

Golova, I. M. (2024). Theoretical foundations for modernizing Russia’s innovation policy to ensure technological independence. AlterEconomics, 21 (3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-3.1  (In Russ.)

Golovnin, M. Yu., Nikolaev, I. A., Akhapkin, N. Yu., Lenchuk, E. B., Bukina, I. S., Lykova, L. N., Pylin, A. G., Ushkalova, D. I., Kvashnina, I. A., Baskakova, M. E., Bobkov, V. N., Gulyugina, A. A., Odintsova, E. V., Sedlov, A. P., Sobolev, E. N., Soboleva, I. V., & Chernykh, E. A. (2025). Rossiyskaya ekonomika pod sanktsionnym davleniyem: promezhutochnyye itogi (2022–2025 gg.) i perspektivy razvitiya: Nauchnyy doklad [Russian Economy Under Sanction Pressure: Preliminary Results (2022–2025) and Prospects for Development: Scientific Report]. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 120. (In Russ.)

Goryacheva, T. V., & Myzrova, O. A. (2023). The role and place of technological sovereignty in ensuring the Russian economy sustainability. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravleniye. Pravo [Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law], 23 (2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-2-134-145  (In Russ.)

Ivanova, N. I. (2002). Natsional’nyye innovatsionnyye sistemy [National innovation systems]. Moscow: International Academic Publishing Company “Nauka”, 244. (In Russ.)

Ivanova, N. I., Nochevkina, L. P., Danilin, I. V., Shelyubskaya, N. V., Toganova, N. V., Chernoutsan, E. M., Kostyukova, K. S., Kirichenko, I. V., Mamedyarov, Z. A., & Levashenko, A. D. (2016). Otraslevyye instrumenty innovatsionnoy politiki [Industry tools of innovation policy]. Moscow: Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, 161. https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0478-2  (In Russ.)

Jurowetzki, R., Lema, R., & Lundvall, B. (2018). Combining innovation systems and global value chains for development: Towards a research agenda. European Journal of Development Research, 30 (3), 364–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0137-4

Kleiner, G. B. (2024). Generating innovations under restrictions. Finansy i biznes [Finance and Business], 20 (2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14267969  (In Russ.)

Kornai, J. (2016). The system paradigm revisited: Clarification and additions in the light of experiences in the post-socialist region. Acta Oeconomica, 66 (4), 547–596. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.4.1

Kornai, Ja. (2002). System paradigm. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (4), 4–11. (In Russ.)

Kravchenko, N. A. (2021). National innovation system: Construction in progress. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice], 3 (4), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.5  (In Russ.)

Kvint, V. L., Trachuk, A. V., & Dzgoev, V. D. (2021). Strategirovaniye natsional’nykh i regional’nykh innovatsionnykh sistem [Strategizing national and regional innovation systems]. Moscow: Publishing House “Byudzhet”, 199. https://doi.org/10.34829/KARO.978-5-6046414-0-8  (In Russ.)

Lenchuk, E. B. (2024). Technological sovereignty — a new trend in Russian scientific and technological policy. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (3(64)), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_232-237  (In Russ.)

Lenchuk, E. B. (2025). Technological sovereignty in focus of Russian economic policy. Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 253 (3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2025-253-3-421-431  (In Russ.)

Lenchuk, E. B., & Filatov, V. I. (2024). Technological Sovereignty Projects as a Tool for Innovative Development of the Russian Economy. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast], 17 (3), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.4  (In Russ.)

Lenchuk, E. B., Nikolaev, I. A., Lykova, L. N., Akhapkin, N. Yu., Filatov, V. I., Sokolov, A. B., Dorzhieva, V. V., Vologova, Yu. V., Afanasyev, A. A., Voloshin, V. I., Ivanova, L. N., & Ilyina, S. A. (2024). Transformatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki v usloviyakh formirovaniya tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta [Transformation of the Russian economy in the context of the formation of technological sovereignty]. Saint Petersburg: “Aleteyya” Publ., 368. (In Russ.)

Lundvall, B.-Å., Dosi, G., & Freeman, C. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. L. G. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349–369). Pinter Publishers.

Polterovich, V. (2008). National innovation system formation principles. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Management], (11), 8–19. (In Russ.)

Razinkina, I. V. (2022). Evolution of innovation helix: Comparative analysis of triple, quadruple and quintuple helix models. Ekonomicheskiye nauki [Economic Sciences], (1(206)), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.206.131  (In Russ.)

Samovoleva, S. A. (2022). Innovation policy development: Former objectives and new challenges. Innovatsii [Innovations], (1(279)), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.26310/2071-3010.2022.279.1.009  (In Russ.)

Sarayev, V. V., Medovnikov, D. S., Rozmirovich, S. D., Oganesyan, T. K., Mamed’yarov, Z. A., Kostina, G. A., Mekhanik, A. G., Ruban, O. L., Rytsareva, E. K., Stepanov, A. K., & Chekhovskiy, I. V. (2020). Rozhdeniye korporativnykh ekosistem [The birth of corporate ecosystems]. Moscow: Innopraktika Publ., 86. (In Russ.)

Sheptunov, S. A., Karlova, T. V., Vorobjev, I. V., & Barashkova, A. L. (2017). Successful press service for science: Conditions and methods. In 2017 International Conference “Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies” (IT&QM&IS) (pp. 279–281). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085810

Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2015). Globalizirovannaya ekonomika: ot iyerarkhiy k setevomu ukladu [The globalized economy: From hierarchies to a network order]. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 344. (In Russ.)

Smorodinskaya, N., & Katukov, D. (2024). A global turn in national industrial strategies: The move towards technological self-sufficiency. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economy], (12), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367624120014  (In Russ.)

Takács, P. (2020). Renaming States — A Case Study: Changing the name of the Hungarian State
in 2011. Its background, reasons, and Aftermath. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 33 (3), 899–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09692-y

Vlaskin, G. A. (2017). Innovation potential of big business in Russia. Federalizm [Federalism], (1(85)), 53–70. (In Russ.)

Vologova, Yu. (2024). State corporations in the implementation of scientific and technological po­licy of Russia. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], (6), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367624060055  (In Russ.)

Vologova, Yu. (2025a). Innovative development programs of state-owned companies and the policy of technological sovereignty: In search of connections. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economics], (10), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367625100023  (In Russ.)

Vologova, Yu. V. (2025b). Programmy innovatsionnogo razvitiya: Opyt realizatsii i novyye prioritety v politike tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta: Nauchnyy doklad [Innovative Development Programs: Implementation experience and new priorities in the policy of technological sovereignty: Scientific Report]. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 66. (In Russ.)

Vologova, Yu. V., Sokolov, A. B., & Nazarova, O. E. (2023). Formirovaniye instrumentov, mer
i mekhanizmov podderzhki rossiyskogo IKT-sektora v usloviyakh nestabil’nosti vneshney sredy: Nauchnyy doklad [Formation of tools, measures and mechanisms to support the Russian ICT-sector
in conditions of unstable external environment: Scientific Report].
Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS, 79. (In Russ.)

JATS

Продолжая использовать этот сайт, вы соглашаетесь с использованием cookie-файлов.
Принять