For citation:
Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (2022). Economic Theory, Ideology, and Economic Interests. AlterEconomics, 19(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-1.5.
Abstract:
The social significance of economic theory is widely discussed in Russia and in the world. The role of economic theory depends on the efforts of theoretical economists themselves as well as on the context of its development. Ideology and economic interests are important elements of this context. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine these elements and the relationship between economic theory, ideology and economic interests in Western countries, in China and the USSR by comparing neoclassical economic theory, “political economy with Chinese characteristics”, and political economy developed in the early Soviet period. Methodologically, the study relies on the methods of cross-country analysis, case study and biographical analysis. The study comprises three levels: individual, institutional, and societal. The individual level is represented by individual economists, more specifically, the focus will be made on Nikolai Kondratiev’s views and ideological preferences. The institutional level is represented by communities of economists working within common areas of interest. The societal level means that economic theory, ideology and economic interests are considered at the level of society as a whole. As a result of the study, similar patterns of development of neoclassical economic theory, Soviet political economy, and “political economy with Chinese characteristics” were identified. These similarities can be explained by the role of economic theory in society and the way economic knowledge is organized and functions. It was also shown that a mismatch between the development of economic theory, ideology and economic interests may have a negative impact. It was observed towards individual economists, what is shown in the example of Kondratiev, and specific areas of economic theory development in the period of Soviet political economy.
Achilova, E. N. (2009). Ekonomicheskiy diskurs kak raznovidnost’ institutsional’nogo: kvalifikatsiya i struktura [Economic discourse as variety the institutionall discourse: qualification and structure]. Kul’turnaya zhizn’ Yuga Rossii [Cultural Studies of Russian South], 3(32), 94-96. (In Russ.)
Agapova, I. I. (2002). Ekonomika i etika: aspekty vzaimodeystviya [Economics and Ethics: aspects of interaction]. Moscow, Russia: Yurist, 189. (In Russ.)
Ananyin, O. I. (2005). Struktura ekonomiko-teoreticheskogo znaniya: metodologicheskiy analiz [Structure of economic and theoretical knowledge: methodological analysis]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka; Institut ekonomiki, 244. (In Russ.)
Ananyin, O. I. (2021). Genezis ekonomicheskoy nauki: istoriko-nauchnyy kontekst: Doklad [The genesis of economic science contextualised in the history of science: report]. Moscow, Russia: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 52. (In Russ.)
Biankina, A. O. & Lyasnikov, N. V. (2018). Nauchnoe nasledie N. Kondrat’eva kak osnova prognozirovaniya postindustrial’noy ekonomicheskoy dinamiki [N. Kondratiev’s scientific heritage as a basis for forecasting the global economic trends of the 21st century]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik [E-journal public administration], 67, 170-180. (In Russ.)
Borokh, O. & Lomanov, A. V. (2020). Kitayskiy put’ reform v usloviyakh globalizatsii [China’s path of reform under conditions of globalization]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 64(6), 66-75. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-66-75. (In Russ.)
Borokh, O. N. (2019). Vliyanie ideologii i politiki na sovremennuyu ekonomicheskuyu nauku v Kitae [The impact of ideology and politics upon modern economics in China]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [World economy and international relations], 63(10), 30-41. (In Russ.)
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2010). The global financial crisis and a new capitalism? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 32(4), 499-534.
Burov, V. G. (2020). Novye tendentsii v kitayskoy ideologii posle XVIII s’ezda KPK [New trends in Chinese ideology after the 18th Congress of the CPC]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya [Asia and Africa today], 10, 4-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750011105-7. (In Russ.)
Gorina, A. P. (1999). Vliyanie nauchnogo naslediya N. D. Kondrat’eva na teoriyu i praktiku planirovaniya i gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya [The influence of N. D. Kondratiev’s scientific heritage on the theory and practice of planning and state regulation]. Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta [Mordovia University Bulletin], 1/2, 24-27. (In Russ.)
Jackson, W. A. (1993). Culture, society and economic theory. Review of Political Economy, 5(4), 453-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259300000031.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovyy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Russia: Peremena, 477. (In Russ.)
Khudokormov, A. G., Nelyubina, A. S. et al. (2018). Novye shtudii po sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy teorii Zapada [New studies on modern Economic Theory of the West]. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta. Elektronnyy zhurnal [Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal], 10(1), 7-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2018-10-1-7-73. (In Russ.)
Kirdina, S. G. (2013). Preodolevaya ogranicheniya metodologicheskogo individualizma [Overcoming the limitations of methodological individualism]. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 4, 100-110. (In Russ.)
Kirdina, S. G. (2014). Institutsional’nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Vvedenie v Kh-Y-teoriyu [Institutional Matrices and Development in Russia. An introduction to X&Y theory]. 3rd Edition. Moscow; St Petersburg, Russia: Nestor-Istoriya, 468. (In Russ.)
Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (2021). Paradoksy sinteza v ekonomicheskoy teorii [Paradoxes of synthesis in economics]. Terra Economicus, 19(3), 37-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-3-37-52. (In Russ.)
Kondratiev, N. D. (1927). Plan i predviden’e: K voprosu o metodakh sostavleniya perspektivnykh planov razvitiya narodnogo khozyaystva i sel’skogo khozyaystva v chastnosti [Plan and foresight: On the question of methods of drawing up long-term plans for the development of the national economy and agriculture in particular]. Puti razvitiya sel’skogo khozyaystva [Ways of agricultural development], 2, 3-36. (In Russ.)
Kondratiev, N. D. (1927a). Kriticheskie zametki o plane razvitiya narodnogo khozyaystva [Critical notes on the national economy development plan]. Planovoe khozyaystvo [Planned economy], 4, 1-33. (In Russ.)
Koshovets, O. B. (2021). Izmeryat’ i pravit’: kak nauka i gosudarstvo proizvodyat ekonomicheskie znaniya [Measure and rule: How science and government produce economic knowledge]. Terra Economicus, 19(3), 6-19. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-3-6-19. (In Russ.)
Kuznetsova, T. E. (2005). K istorii Instituta ekonomiki RAN (AN SSSR): domysly i realii [On the History of the Institute of Economics of the RAS (USSR Academy of Sciences): Conjectures and realities]. Moscow, Russia: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 68. (In Russ.)
Madra, Y. M. (2017). Late Neoclassical Economics: The restoration of theoretical humanism in contemporary economic theory. London: Routledge, 218.
Makasheva, N. A. (1989). N. D. Kondratiev. Biograficheskiy ocherk [N. D. Kondratiev. Biographical sketch]. N. D. Kondratiev. Problemy ekonomicheskoy dinamiki [N. D. Kondratiev. Problems of economic dynamics]. Moscow, Russia: Ekonomika, 6-20. (In Russ.)
Makasheva, N. A. (2017). Kogda istoriya vtorgaetsya v nauku: k 125-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya N. D. Kondrat’eva [When history invades science: to the 125th anniversary of the birth of N. D. Kon
dratiev]. N. D. Kondratiev: krizisy i prognozy v svete teorii dlinnykh voln. Vzglyad iz sovremennosti [N. D. Kondratiev: crises and forecasts in the light of the theory of long waves. A look from modernity]. In L. E. Grinin, A. V. Korotaev, V. M. Bondarenko (Eds.). Moscow, Russia: Uchitel’, 48-60. (In Russ.)
Mamedov, O. Yu. (2014). Ekonomicheskaya teoriya nuzhna. Vsem. Krome ekonomistov? [Everyone needs economic theory. Everyone. Except from economists?]. Terra Economicus, 12(3), 8-14. (In Russ.)
Mastrine, J. (2020). Beyond Left vs Right: 14 Types of Ideological Bias. AllSides. Retrieved from: https://www.allsides.com/blog/beyond-left-vs-right-14-types-ideological-bias (Date of access: 07.11.2021).
Nabi, N. (2015). The Western Economic Thought and its Response from the Muslim World: An Over view. International Journal of Science & Research, 4(3), 416-426.
Nekipelov, A. D. (2017). “Novyy pragmatism” professora G. Kolodko: Al’ternativa ili dopolnenie chistoy ekonomicheskoy teorii? [“New pragmatism” of professor G. Kolodko: alternative or addition to pure economic theory?]. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 1(1), 22-39. (In Russ.)
North, D. (2010). Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmeneniiy [Understanding the process of Economic change]. Translated by K. Martynov, N. Edel’man. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of HSE, 256. (In Russ.)
Nureev, R. M. & Orekhovsky, P. A. (2021). Diskussii vokrug osnovnogo proizvodstvennogo otnosheniya v politekonomii sotsializma: kognitivnyy tupik 1970-kh [Debates around the Basic Production Relationship in Political Economy of Socialism: The Cognitive Deadlock in the 1970s]. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18(2), 185-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-2.2. (In Russ.)
Oleinik, A. N. (2021). O vozmozhnykh metodologicheskikh osnovaniyakh pragmaticheskoy ekonomicheskoy teorii: T. Bayes i Dzh. D’yui [On possible methodological foundations of pragmatic economic theory: T. Bayes and J. Dewey]. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 3, 34-51. (In Russ.)
Orekhov, A. M. & Akhmedov, F. N. (2013). Ekonomicheskaya ideologiya: opyt interpretatsii [Economic ideology: the experience of interpretation]. Sotsium i vlast’ [Society and Power], 6(44), 90-95. (In Russ.)
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and Ideology. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1104.
Polterovich, V. M. (2017). Razrabotka strategiy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: nauka vs ideologiya. [Designing the strategies for socio-economic development: science VS. Ideology]. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 1, 55-65. (In Russ.)
Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics Rules. The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York; London: W.W. Norton & Company, 272.
Rozanvallon, P. (2007). Utopicheskiy kapitalizm: Istoriya idei rynka [Utopian capitalism: The History of the idea of the market]. Moscow, Russia: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 266. (In Russ.)
Rubinshtein, A. (2008). Dilemmy ekonomista-teoretika [Dilemmas of an Economic Theorist]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 11, 62-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-11-62-80. (In Russ.)
Samsin, A. I. (2003). Osnovy filosofii ekonomiki [Fundamentals of the Philosophy of Economics]. Study guide. Moscow, Russia: YuNITI-DANA, 271. (In Russ.)
Schumpeter, J. (1949). Science and ideology. American Economic Review, 39, 345-359.
Schumpeter, J. (2012). Nauka i ideologiya [Science and ideology]. Filosofiya ekonomiki: Antologiya [Philosophy of Economics. An anthology]. Moscow, Russia: Publishing House of Gaidar institution, 247-264. (In Russ.)
Semyuels, U. (1981). Ideologiya v ekonomicheskom analize [Ideology in Economic Analysis]. Sovremennaya ekonomicheskaya mysl’ [Modern Economic Thought]. In S. Weinstraub (Eds.) Moscow, Russia: Progress, 661-682. (In Russ.)
Sheygal, E. I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena, 368. (In Russ.)
Simonov, V. V. & Figurovskaya, N. K. (1994). Ekonomika zdravogo smysla. Shtrikhi k portretu N. D. Kondrat’eva [Economics of common sense. Touches to the portrait of N. D. Kondratiev]. Vestnik Akademii nauk SSSR [Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 4, 46-58. (In Russ.)
Stiglitz, J. (2010). Freefall. America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 480.
Strumilin, S. G. (1927). K teorii planirovaniya [To the theory of planning]. Planovoe khozyaystvo [Planned economy], 11, 115-133. (In Russ.)
Van Lan & Zhao Inin (2010). Svyaz’ mezhdu kitaizatsiey marksizma i modernizatsiey Kitaya [Correlation between the Sinification of Marxism and China modernization]. Reforma i otkrytost’ [Reform and opening], 3, 16-17. (In Russ.)
Vinogradov, A. V. (2010). Kitayskaya modernizatsiya v sravnitel’noy perspektive [Chinese Modernization in Comparative Perspective]. Sravnitel’naya politika [Comparative Politics Russia], 1(1), 104-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2010-1-1-104-120. (In Russ.)
Volynskii, A. I. (2021). Komplementarnye ekonomicheskie instituty i ideologii: est’ li svyaz’? [Is There a Link Between Complementary Economic Institutions and Ideologies?] Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18(4), 497-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.2. (In Russ.)