2022 (19), №2

Economic Theory and the Formation of Human Qualities

For citation: 

Polterovich, V. M. (2022). Economic Theory and the Formation of Human Qualities. AlterEconomics, 19(2), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-2.1


The article argues that economic theory not only takes into account human qualities as factors influencing the evolution and efficiency of economic mechanisms, but also indirectly impacts their formation. Scientific research generates an ideology which economic policies draw from to build economic institutions. Institutions determine the standards of behavior of individuals and consequently influence their qualities. Such a chain of determinants can be illustrated by the case of the Chicago School of Economics, which proclaimed competition as the main driving force for social and economic development. The recommendations of this school contributed to the formation of neoliberal ideology, which over the years has determined both the policy of Western countries and the nature of reforms in transition economies. Neoliberals argued that economic competition does not involve any violation of moral norms, since a perfect market means impersonal rivalry. There is ample evidence, however, that economic and political competition generates a hostile attitude toward rivals, pushing the participants to disregard the principles of morality. In conditions of tough confrontation, economic and political leaders are often willing to defeat their competitors by whatever means possible, while being unable or unwilling to make decisions to improve public welfare. The degradation of human qualities, in its turn, can lead to a decline in the quality of scientific research. These findings provide an insight into one of the causal chains leading to the crisis of competitive institutions observed in Western countries. To struggle with the crisis, they seek to constrain competition and increase the role of collaborative institutions.

Victor M. POLTEROVICH, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Member of RAS, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of RAS, 47, Nakhimovsky prospekt, Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1/61, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119234, Russian Federation, e-mail: polterov@cemi.rssi.ru,  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-6823

Alesina, A. & Giuliano, P. (2015). Culture and institutions.  Journal of Economic Literature, 53(4),  898–944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.53.4.898.

Avtonomov, V. S. (2015). Na kakie svoystva cheloveka mozhet operet’sya ekonomicheskiy liberalizm? [Which human qualities can economic liberalism be based on?].  Voprosy ekonomiki, 8,  5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2015–8-5–24. (In Russ.)

Brandenburger, A. & Nalebuff, B. (1996).  Co-opetition.  New York: Doubleday, 290.

Chang, C. & Fraser, J. H. (2017). Cooperate! A paradigm shift for health equity.  International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(12),  1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939–016–0508–4.

De Wijze, S. (2018). The problem of democratic dirty hands: Citizen complicity, responsibility, and guilt.  The Monist, 101(2),  129–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx039.

Dewatripont, M. & Tirole, J.  Incentives and Ethics: How Markets and Organizations Shape our Moral Behavior.  Retrieved from: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/by/tirole/incentives_and_ethics_201219.pdf (Date of access: 16.12.2021).

Feltovich, N. (2019). The interaction between competition and unethical behaviour.  Experimental Economics, 22(1),  101–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683–018–9578-z.

Fülöp, M. (2004). Competition as a Culturally Constructed Concept. Competition as a Culturally Constructed Concept.  Travelling Facts. The Social Construction, Distribution, and Accumulation of Knowledge,  124–148.

Guseynov, A. A. (1972). Zolotoe pravilo nravstvennosti [Golden rule].  Vestnik MGU. Ser. 7. Filosofiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy], 4,  53–63. (In Russ.)

Knight, F. H. (2009).  Etika konkurentsii [The ethics of competition].  Moscow, Russia: Ekom, 605. (In Russ.)

Paldam, M. (2018). A model of the representative economist, as researcher and policy ad-visor.  Euro-pean Journal of Political Economy, 54,  5–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.03.005.

Polterovich, V. M. (2016). Pozitivnoe sotrudnichestvo: faktory i mekhanizmy evolyutsii [Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution].  Voprosy ekonomiki, 11,  5–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2016–11–5-23. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2015). Ot sotsial’nogo liberalizma — k filosofii sotrudnichestva [From social liberalism towards the philosophy of collaboration].  Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and contemporary world], 4,  41–64. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2017). Razrabotka strategiy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: nauka vs ideologiya [Designing the strategies for socio-economic development: science vs. ideology].  Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Theoretical Economics], 1,  55–65. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2018). K obshchey teorii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Chast’ 2. Evolyutsiya mekhanizmov koordinatsii [Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms].  Voprosy ekonomiki, 12,  77–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2018–12–77–102. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2021). Krizis institutov politicheskoy konkurentsii, internet i kollaborativnaya demokratiya [Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy].  Voprosy ekonomiki, 1,  52–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2021–1-52–72. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M., Zaostrovtsev, A. P. et al. (2018). Stimuly dlya akademicheskikh i prikladnykh issledovaniy i formirovanie ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva (Materialy kruglogo stola v ramkakh Aprel’skoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii NIU VShE) [Incentives for academic and applied research and the reproduction of the economic community (Proceedings of the roundtable discussion at the XIX April international academic conference on economic and social development)].  Voprosy ekonomiki, 10,  136–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042–8736–2018–10–136–155. (In Russ.)

Reynolds, S. J., Dang, C. T., Yam, K. C., & Leavitt, K. (2014). The role of moral knowledge in everyday immorality: What does it matter if I know what is right?  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2),  124–137. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.008.

Rodrik, D. (2015).  Economics rules. The rights and wrongs of the dismal science.  New York, London: W. W. Norton.

Schurr, A. & Ritov, I. (2016). Winning a competition predicts dishonest behaviour.  Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 113(7),  1754–1759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515102113.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2011).  Krutoe pike. Amerika i novyy ekonomicheskiy poryadok posle global’nogo krizisa [Freefall: America, free markets and the sinking of the world economy].  Trans. from English. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 509. (In Russ.)

Tillyris, D. (2019). Political realism and dirty hands: Value pluralism, moral conflict and public ethics.  Philosophia, 47,  1579–1602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406–019–00071-x.

Walzer, M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands.  Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2),  160–180.

Welzel, Ch. (2017).  Rozhdenie svobody [Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation].  Translated by A. V. Lisovskiy. Moscow, Russia: VCIOM, 403. (In Russ.)

Zacharia, Z., Plasch, M., Mohan, U. & Gerschberger, M. (2019). The Emerging Role of Coopetition within Inter-Firm Relationships.  The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2),  414–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02–2018–0021.