For citation:
Semenova, D. V., & Molodchik, M. A. (2025). Development of Scientific Discourses on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay: From Neoclassicism to Neuroeconomics. AlterEconomics, 22(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2025.22-2.1
Abstract:
This study traces the evolution of scientific views on willingness to pay (WTP), which comprises three main stages corresponding to changes in economic thought. The study is based on a review of 91 key publications found via Google Scholar and e-Library. First, the neoclassical approach saw WTP as an objective measure of marginal utility under rational choice. Although formally rigorous, it was criticized for ignoring cognitive limits and social factors. Second, proponents of the behavioral approach argued that value assessments are systematically distorted. While this approach offered strong explanatory power, its drawback was the resulting fragmentation of models, which made forecasting difficult. Third, the neuroeconomic approach focuses on the biological basis of decision-making, using neuroscience methods. While it identified “neural correlates” of WTP, it remains expensive and not widely applied in practice. Alongside these shifts, methods for measuring WTP evolved—from hypothetical surveys prone to subjectivity to experiments that record actual behavior and physiological reactions. The study systematizes the theoretical and methodological foundations of WTP research and points to future directions, such as expanding interdisciplinary approaches, developing new measurement methods, studying WTP in the digital economy, and using artificial intelligence to improve forecasting of consumer behavior.
Alsharif, A. H., & Isa, S. M. (2025). Electroencephalography Studies on Marketing Stimuli:
A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49 (1), e70015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70015
Alvino, L., van der Lubbe, R., Joosten, R. A., & Constantinides, E. (2020). Which wine do you prefer? An analysis on consumer behaviour and brain activity during a wine tasting experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32 (5), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2019-0240
Ambler, T., Braeutigam, S., Stins, J., Rose, S., & Swithenby, S. (2004). Salience and choice: Neural correlates of shopping decisions. Psychology & Marketing, 21 (4), 247–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20004
Ariely, D., & Berns, G. S. (2010). Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nature reviews neuroscience, 11 (4), 284–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (1), 73–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535153
Arrow, K. J., & Debrue, G. (1954). Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica, 22 (3), 265–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907353
Balderjahn, I. (1991). Ein Verfahren zur empirischen Bestimmung von Preisresponsefunktionen.
Marketing: Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 13 (1), 33–42.
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral science, 9 (3), 226–232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304
Belianin, A. V. (2017). Homo Oeconomicus and Homo Posteconomicus. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (1), 157–161. (In Russ.)
Berezka, S. M., & Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2019). Neurophysiological Methods to Study Consumer Perceptions of Television Advertising Content. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Menedzhment [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management], 18 (2), 175–203. (In Russ.)
Breidert, C., Hahsler, M., & Reutterer, T. (2006). A review of methods for measuring willingness-to-pay. Innovative marketing, 2 (4).
Brown, T. C., Champ, P. A., Bishop, R. C., & McCollum, D. W. (1996). Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?. Land Economics, 72 (2), 152–166.
Busalim, A., Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2022). Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46 (5), 1804–1828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12794
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37 (1), 47–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x
Carroll, J. D., & Green, P. E. (1995). Psychometric methods in marketing research: Part I, conjoint analysis. Journal of marketing Research, 32 (4), 385–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224379503200401
Davenport, H. J. (1902). Proposed modifications in Austrian theory and terminology. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 16 (3), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1881982
Ebert, J. E., & Prelec, D. (2007). The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management science, 53 (9), 1423–1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0671
Einav, L., Klenow, P. J., Klopack, B., Levin, J. D., Levin, L., & Best, W. (2017). Assessing the gains from e-commerce. Unpublished manuscript.
Erk, S., Spitzer, M., Wunderlich, A. P., Galley, L., & Walter, H. (2002). Cultural objects modulate reward circuitry. NeuroReport, 13 (18), 2499–2503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200212200-00024
Gabor, A., Granger, C. W., & Sowter, A. P. (1970). Real and hypothetical shop situations in market research. Journal of Marketing Research, 7 (3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377000700311
Glimcher, P. W. (2004). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. MIT press.
Glimcher, P. W. (Ed.). (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Academic Press.
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 791–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355300554917
Gorin, A., Kuznetsova, E., Kislov, A., Levchenko, E., Klucharev, V., Moiseeva, V., Yurchenko, A., Luzhin, A., Galkina, N., & Shestakova, A. N. (2025). Neural correlates of the non-optimal price: an MEG/EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 19, 1470662. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1470662
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1971). Conjoint measurement-for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing research, 8 (3), 355–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224377100800312
Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Herrmann, A., Schmidt-Gallas, D., & Huber, F. (2000). Adaptive conjoint analysis: understanding the methodology and assessing reliability and validity. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, 253–277.
Hare, T. A., Malmaud, J., & Rangel, A. (2011). Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. Journal of neuroscience, 31 (30), 11077–11087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6383-10.2011
Hare, T. A., O’doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Rangel, A. (2008). Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. Journal of neuroscience, 28 (22), 5623–5630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-08.2008
Hensel, D., Iorga, A., Wolter, L., & Znanewitz, J. (2017). Conducting neuromarketing studies ethically-practitioner perspectives. Cogent Psychology, 4 (1), 1320858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1320858
Hermann, E., & Puntoni, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI. Journal of Business Research, 180, 114720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114720
Hicks, J. R., & Allen, R. G. (1934). A reconsideration of the theory of value. Part II. A mathematical theory of individual demand functions. Economica, 1 (2), 196–219.
Hotelling, H. (1931). The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of political Economy, 39 (2), 137–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/254195
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature neuroscience, 10 (12), 1625–1633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn2007
Kagel, J. H., Harstad, R. M., & Levin, D. (1987). Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica, 55 (6), 1275–1304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913557
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246 (1), 160–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
Kenning, P. H., & Plassmann, H. (2008). How neuroscience can inform consumer research. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 16 (6), 532–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2008.2009788
Kislov, A., Gorin, A., Konstantinovsky, N., Klyuchnikov, V., Bazanov, B., & Klucharev, V. (2022). Central EEG beta/alpha ratio predicts the population-wide efficiency of advertisements. Brain Sciences, 13 (1), 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010057
Knutson, B., & Peterson, R. (2005). Neurally reconstructing expected utility. Games and Economic Behavior, 52 (2), 305–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.01.002
Knutson, B., Rick, S., Wimmer, G. E., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron, 53 (1), 147–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010
Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy, 74 (2), 132–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259131
Le Gall-Ely, M. (2009). Definition, measurement and determinants of the consumer’s willingness to pay: a critical synthesis and avenues for further research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 24 (2), 91–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/205157070902400205
Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64 (2), 183–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1882692
Leung, H., Mak, H. K. F., Leung, M., Leung, K. L., Kwan, P., & Wong, K. S. (2014). Neuroeconomics of health care financing options: willingness to pay and save. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 20 (3 Suppl 3), 8–10.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21 (2), 153–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153
Light, G. A., Williams, L. E., Minow, F., Sprock, J., Rissling, A., Sharp, R., Swerdlow, N. R, & Braff, D. L. (2010). Electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) with human participants. Current protocols in neuroscience, 52 (1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0625s52
Madhuhansi, W. H. T., Ozanne, L. K., Kennedy, A.-M., & Kemper, J. (2025). Consumer Disposal Behaviour of Durable and Semi-Durable Products: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49 (2), e70032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70032
Marbeau, Y. (1987). What value pricing research today. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29 (2), 153–182.
Mayer, M. (1926). Die Sicherheit der Bauwerke und ihre Berechnung nach Grenzkräften anstatt nach zulässigen Spannungen. J. Springer.
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306 (5695), 503–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907
McFadden, D. (1980). Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. The Journal of Business, 53 (3), S13–S29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/296093
McFadden, D. (1986). The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing science, 5 (4), 275–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.5.4.275
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67 (4), 371–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of marketing research, 10 (1), 70–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224377301000110
Monroe, K. B., Rikala, V. M., & Somervuori, O. (2015). Examining the application of behavioral price research in business-to-business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.002
Montague, P. R., & Berns, G. S. (2002). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron, 36 (2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00974-1
Nedelko, A. Yu. (2018). Perspectives and limitations of neuromarketing research methods. Upravlencheskie nauki [Management Sciences], 8 (4), 77–83. (In Russ.)
Nessim, H., & Dodge, R. (1995). Pricing-Policies and Procedures. MacMillan Press.
Newton-Fenner, A., Tyson-Carr, J., Roberts, H., Henderson, J., Hewitt, D., Byrne, A., Fallon, N., Gu, Y., Gorelkina, O., Xie, Y., Pantelous, A., Giesbrecht, T., & Stancak, A. (2022). Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 59 (12), e14125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14125
Panidi, K., Vorobiova, A. N., Feurra, M., & Klucharev, V. (2022). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays causal role in probability weighting during risky choice. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), 16115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18529-6
Pigou, A. C. (1920). Co-operative societies and income tax. The Economic Journal, 30 (118), 156–162.
Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2010). Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making. Journal of neuroscience, 30 (32), 10799–10808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0788-10.2010
Plassmann, H., O’doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. Journal of neuroscience, 27 (37), 9984–9988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007
Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (1), 18–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, 400, 233–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/22268
Provolovich, T. O. (2021). Interdisciplinary Synthesis in Economics. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18 (4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-4.3 (In Russ.)
Rao, V. R., & Hauser, J. (2004). Conjoint Analysis, Related Modeling, and Applications. In Y. Wind, P. E. Green (Eds.)., Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute to Paul Green (pp. 141–168). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-28692-1_7
Risk, D. M. U. (2007). The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in. Science, 1134239 (515), 315.
Rodríguez, V. J. C., Antonovica, A., & Martín, D. L. S. (2023). Consumer neuroscience on branding and packaging: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47 (6), 2790–2815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12936
Rondan-Cataluña, F. J., Escobar-Perez, B., & Moreno-Prada, M. A. (2019). Setting acceptable prices: a key for success in retailing. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 23 (1), 119–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-0013
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). The empirical implications of utility analysis. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 344–356.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300 (5626), 1755–1758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976
Sattler, H., & Nitschke, T. (2003). Ein empirischer Vergleich von Instrumenten zur Erhebung von Zahlungsbereitschaften. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 55, 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372709
Schoenbaum, G., & Esber, G. R. (2010). How do you (estimate you will) like them apples? Integration as a defining trait of orbitofrontal function. Current opinion in neurobiology, 20 (2), 205–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.01.009
Semenova, D. V. (2024). Neuroeconomics of decision-making on chocolate market. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika [Moscow University Economics Bulletin], (2), 264–290. (In Russ.)
Sherif, M., Taub, D., & Hovland, C. I. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55 (2), 150–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0048784
Shokin, Ya. V. (2021). Evolution of economic behavior theories: from Aristotle to neuroeconomics. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute for Systems Analysis Russian Academy of Sciences], 71 (4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.14357/20790279210406 (In Russ.)
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Smidts, A., Hsu, M., Sanfey, A. G., Boksem, M. A., Ebstein, R. B., Huettel, S. A., Kable, J. W., Karmarkar, U. R., Kitayama, S., Knutson, B., Liberzon, I., Lohrenz, T., Stallen, M. & Yoon, C. (2014). Advancing consumer neuroscience. Marketing Letters, 25, 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9306-1
Sokratous, K., Fitch, A. K., & Kvam, P. D. (2023). How to ask twenty questions and win: Machine learning tools for assessing preferences from small samples of willingness-to-pay prices. Journal of choice modelling, 48, 100418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100418
Stoetzel, J. (1954). In PL Reynaud (Ed.), La Psychologie Economique, chapter “Le Prix Comme Limite”. Paris: PL Reynaud.
Stout, R. G. (1969). Developing data to estimate price-quantity relationships. Journal of Marketing, 33 (2), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224296903300206
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4 (3), 199–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. WW Norton & Company.
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. In Amsterdam Law Forum; HeinOnline: Online (p. 89).
Toledo-Gallegos, V. M., Long, J., Campbell, D., Börger, T., & Hanley, N. (2021). Spatial clustering of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72 (3), 673–697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12428
Tortajada, E. G., Moreira, A. C., Duarte, P., & Silva, S. C. (2024). Circular economy and sustainability in luxury fashion consumer behavior: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48 (5), e13089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13089
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185 (4157), 1124–1131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Van Westendorp, P. H. (1976, September). NSS Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)–A new approach to study consumer perception of prices. In Proceedings of the 29th ESOMAR Congress (Vol. 139167).
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance, 16 (1), 8–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x
Yan, L., Qiling, X., & Wu, S. (2024, January). The Effects of Voice Emotions on Users’ Willingness to Pay Decision-Making Process of Automated Delivery Robots: An ERP Study. In SH Sheu (Ed.), International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (pp. 112–128). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56373-7_10
Zhilina, I. Yu. (2018). Richard Thaler and the History of Behavioral Economics. (Review). Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki: Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 2: Ekonomika. Referativnyy zhurnal [Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 2: Economy], (2), 7–19. (In Russ.)