2022 (19), №3

Constructing the Public Discourse of Innovative Development (The Case of Russia)

For citation: 

Kurysheva, A. A., Pokusaenko, M. A. & Volchik, V. V. (2022). Constructing the Public Discourse of Innovative Development (The Case of Russia). AlterEconomics, 19(3), 464–482.


The discourse of innovative development has gained currency over the past decade in Russia as governmental agencies have been putting considerable effort into promoting narratives about the role of innovation in the national economy. In contrast with the post-Soviet period of the 1990s and 2000s, the 2010s in Russia have seen a shift in the public discourse as more significance started to be attached to university-business-government partnership. The study uses the empirical data collected from Integrum, an archive of mass-media sources from Russia and other ex-Soviet countries, over a 10-year period (from January 1, 2010 to July 1, 2021). Methodologically, the study relies on methods of applied narrative analysis. The study identifies five key narratives of innovative development propagated by governmental agencies and the Russian academia. Advances in science and technology were among the key priorities set by Russia’s National Security Strategy, a milestone document adopted in 2015. The government saw university-business-government partnership as the best way of ensuring innovative development. However, members of the academia as well as governmental officials themselves admitted the lack of actual cooperation and effective dialogue between business and universities. Moreover, scientists emphasized the need for more academic freedom and criticized the government for excessive control (including financial matters), which led them to underestimate the role of the state in innovative development.

Anna A. Kurysheva — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Research Associate, Southern Federal University; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8334-4594 (105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation; e-mail: aaoganesyan@sfedu.ru).

Mariya A. Pokusaenko — PhD Student, Assistant Lecturer, Southern Federal University; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-0563 (105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation; e-mail: voropay@sfedu.ru).

Vyacheslav V. Volchik — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Southern Federal University; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-3442 (105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation; e-mail: volchik@sfedu.ru).

Akerlof, G. & Shiller, R. (2009).  Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global Capitalism.  Princeton, United States: Princeton University Press, 230.

Akerlof, G. A. & Kranton, R. E. (2010).  Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being.  Princeton and Oxford: Princeton, United States: Princeton University Press, 185.

Akerlof, G. A. & Snower, D. J. (2016). Bread and bullets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126(B),  58-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.021.

Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Diskurs [Discourse]. Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary].  Moscow, Russia: Soviet Encyclopedia, 136-137. (In Russ.)

Assa, J. (2018). Finance, social value, and the rhetoric of GDP.  Finance and Society, 4(2) , 144-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v4i2.2869.

Berger, P. & Luckman, Th. (1991).  The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.  London, UK: Penguin Books, 256.

Chesney, M. (2017).  Permanentnyy krizis. Rost finansovoy aristokratii i porazhenie demokratii [A Permanent Crisis. The Financial Oligarchy’s Seizing of Power and the Failure of Democracy].  Translated from French by M. Mayatskiy, A. Shargorodskiy. In M. Mayatskiy (Eds.). Moscow, Russia: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 144. (In Russ.)

Commons, J. (1934).  Myself.  New York, the USA: The Macmillan Company, 201.

Commons, J. (1936). Institutional economics.  The American Economic Review, 26(1), Supplement, Papers and Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association,  237-249.

Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics.  The American Economic Review, 21(4),  648-657.

Efimov, V. (2011). Diskursivnyy analiz v ekonomike: peresmotr metodologii i istorii ekonomicheskoy nauki [Towards Discursive Economics: Methodology and History of Economics Revised].  Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology], 12(3),  15-53. (In Russ.)

Guest, G., Namey, E. & Mitchell, M. (2013).  Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research.  USA: SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680.

Khanin, G. I. (2017). Magnaty sovremennoy rossiyskoy ekonomiki vo vtoroy polovine 90-kh godov i v 2000-e gody [Russia’s magnates in the second half of the 1990s and in 2000s].  Terra Economicus, 15(2),  18-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-2-18-39. (In Russ.)

Milekhina, T. A. (2006).  Rossiyskie predprinimateli i ikh rech’: obraz, kontsepty, tipy rechevykh struktur [Russian entrepreneurs and their language: characteristics, concepts, types of speech structures: Thesis of Dr. Sci. (Econ.). 10.02.01.  Saratov, Russia, 484. (In Russ.)

Obdalova, O. A. & Levashkina, Z. N. (2019). Ponyatie “narrativ” kak fenomen kul’tury i ob»ekt diskursivnoy deyatel’nosti [“Narrative” as a Cultural Phenomenon and an Object of Discursive Activity].  Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and Culture], 48,  332-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/48/21. (In Russ.)

Schumpeter, J. A. (1982).  Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [The Theory of Economic Development].  Translated by V. C. Avtonomov et al. Moscow, Russia: Progress. (In Russ.)

Shiller, R. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967-1004. DOI: 10.1257/aer.107.4.967.

Shiller, R. (2019).  Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events.  Princeton, United States: Princeton University Press, 400.

Shiriaev, I. M. (2022). Dinamika innovatsionnoy aktivnosti v kontekste podkhoda narrativnoy ekonomiki [Dynamics of Innovation Activity in the Context of the Narrative Economics Approach].  Upravlenie naukoy: teoriya i praktika [Science Management: Theory and Practice],  4(1), 84-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.5. (In Russ.)

Shiriaev, I. M., Kurysheva, A. A. & Volchik, V. V. (2021). Narrativnyy institutsional’nyy analiz i rossiyskaya innovatsionnaya sistema [Narrative Institutional Analysis and The National Innovation System in Russia].  Journal of Institutional Studies, 13(3),  81-101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.3.081-101. (In Russ.)

Stiglitz, J. (2019).  Lyudi, vlast’ i pribyl’ [People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent].  Alpina Digital, 510. (In Russ.)

Ulanovsky, A. M. (2009). Kachestvennye issledovaniya: podkhody, strategii, metody [Qualitative researches: approaches, strategies, methods].  Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal], 30(2),  18-28. (In Russ.)

Volchik, V. B., Fursa, E. V. & Maskaev, A. I. (2021). Perspektivy razvitiya rossiyskoy innovatsionnoy sistemy skvoz’ prizmu kachestvennykh metodov [Prospects of development of the Russian innovative system through the prism of qualitative methods].  Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 15(4),  641-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2021.4.641-660. (In Russ.)

Volchik, V. V. & Maslyukova, E. V. (2021). Vozmozhnosti narrativnoy ekonomiki v issledovaniyakh rossiyskoy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Narrative Economics perspective on modeling national innovation system].  Terra Economicus, 19(4),  36-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-4-36-50. (In Russ.)