2023 (20), №3

“Conceptual Framework” of Economic Theory: History, Potential, and Prospects of Application

For citation: 

Dyatel, E.P. (2023). “Conceptual Framework” of Economic Theory: History, Potential, and Prospects of Application. AlterEconomics, 20(3), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.3

Abstract:

Conceptual framework stands as a pivotal notion in the methodological landscape of European sciences, having found productive applications in physics, mathematics, linguistics, and sociology. In the realm of economics, however, its potential remains underexplored, making it imperative to explore its heuristic value and integrate this methodological concept in contemporary research. This article aims to outline the conceptual framework of economic theory at different stages of its development and explore how it can organize the structure of economic science. The study analyzes the evolution of conceptualism in a sequence. This journey starts with classical education, shaping a scholar’s worldview, and classical science, combining rational (descriptive) and experimental (explanatory) research. It extends to modern (non-classical) scientific concepts, like neoclassical, evolutionary, and neo-institutional economic theory. The article examines different viewpoints, including those of positivists (E. Mach, R. Carnap, etc.), postpositivists (K. Popper, T. Kuhn, I. Lakatos), and economists (K. Marx, L. Walras, D. North). It identifies and describes the conceptual framework of Marxism, which is based on materialist dialectics and historical materialist perspectives. The article also shows how using the conceptual worldview and fundamental concepts effectively structures normative economics, classical political economy, neoclassicism, and other areas of economics.

PDF full
Downloaded: 74

Evgeny P. Dyatel — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Research Associate at the Center for Economic Theory, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-8060 (29, Moskovskaya St., Ekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation, 29; e-mail: dyatel1942@mail.ru).

Aristotle (1975). Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Writings. In 4 Vols. Vol. 1 (pp. 63–367). Moscow, Russia: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.)

Aristotle (1978). Vtoraya analitika [Second Analytics]. Writings. In 4 Vols. Vol. 2 (pp. 255–346). Moscow, Russia: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.)

Bernshtein, E. (1991). Vozmozhen li nauchnyy sotsializm? Predislovie E. L. Petrenko [Whether Scientific Socialism is Possible. Foreword by Ye. L. Petrenko]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 4, 175–181. (In Russ.)

Bogatov, E. M. (2017). Ob istorii razvitiya nelineynykh integral’nykh uravneniy v SSSR. Sil’nye nelineynosti [About the History of Developmnent of Nonlinear Integral Equations in the USSR. Strong Nonlinearities]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Matematika. Fizika [Research Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Mathematics. Physics], 6 (255), 93–106. (In Russ.)

Bunge, M. (1962). Prichinnost’. Mesto printsipa prichinnosti v sovremennoy nauke [Causality: The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science]. Moscow, Russia: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 512. (In Russ.)

Carnap, R. (1959). Znachenie i neobkhodimost’. Issledovanie po semantike i modal’noy logike [Meaning and Necessity — A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic]. Moscow, Russia: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 384. (In Russ.)

Carnap, R., Hahn, H., & Neurath, O. (2005). Nauchnoe miroponimanie — venskiy kruzhok [The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle]. Logos, 2 (47), 13–26. (In Russ.)

Comte, O. (2003). Dukh pozitivnoy filosofii. (Slovo o polozhitel’nom myshlenii) [The Spirit of Positive Philosophy]. Translated from French by I. A. Shapiro. Rostov-on-Don, Russia: Phoenix, 256. (In Russ.)

Сomte, A. (1968). System of positive polity. New York: B. Franklin, 793.

Duhem, P. (2011). Fizicheskaya teoriya. Ee tsel’ i stroenie [Physical theory: Its object and structure]. Moscow, Russia: KomKniga Publ., 328. (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (1987). Sistemnyy analiz ob’’ekta i predmeta v “Kapitale” K. Marksa [System Analysis of the Object and the Subject in K. Marx’s Capital]. Irkutsk, Russia: Publishing House of the Irkutsk University, 224. (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2019). Kriterii nauchnoy dostovernosti i sposoby povysheniya evristicheskogo potentsiala ekonomicheskoy teorii [Scientific Criteria and Means of Enhancing the Heuristic Potential of Economic Theory]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16 (3), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.18 (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2021). Status ekonomicheskoy teorii kak nauchnoy i uchebnoy distsipliny [The Status of Economic Theory as a Scientific and Educational Discipline]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 18 (3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-3.4 (In Russ.)

Engels, F. (1961). Anti-Dyuring [Anti-Dühring]. Collected Works. Vol. 20. (pp. 5–338). Moscow, the USSR: State Publishing House for Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Gaydenko, P. P. (2000). Istoriya novoevropeyskoy filosofii v ee svyazi s naukoy [The History of Modern European Philosophy in its Relation to Science]. Moscow, Russia: “Universitetskaya kniga” Publ., 456. (In Russ.)

Gödel, K. (1984). What is Cantor’s continuum problem? In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (pp. 470–485). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171519.025

Holton, G. J. (1981). Tematicheskiy analiz nauki [Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein]. Translated from English by A. L. Velikovich, V.S. Kirsanov, A.E. Levin. In corresponding member of Academy of Sciences of the USSR S.R. Mikulinskiy (Ed.). Moscow, Russia: Progress, 383. (In Russ.)

Jevons, W. S. (1924). The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan, 339.

John of Salisbury (1962). The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury. A Twelfth-Century Defense of the Verbal and Logical Arts of the Trivium. Berkley: Univ. of California Press, 305.

Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (2023). O sinteze i mezhdistsiplinarnosti v ekonomicheskoy teorii: sravnenie russkoyazychnogo i angloyazychnogo diskursov [On Synthesis and Interdisciplinarity in Economics: Comparison of Russian and English Discourses]. AlterEconomics, 20 (1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.4 (In Russ.)

Kleiner, G. B. (2023). Rasshiryayushchayasya vselennaya ekonomicheskoy teorii [Expanding
Universe of Economic Theory]. AlterEconomics, 20 (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/
2023.20-1.1 (In Russ.)

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, Russia: «Progress», 300. (In Russ.)

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 210.

Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In Harding, S. G. (Eds.). Can Theories be Refuted? Synthese Library, Vol. 81. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_14

Lakatos, I. (1978). Istoriya nauki i ee ratsional’nye rekonstruktsii [History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions]. Struktura i razvitie nauki. Iz Bostonskikh issledovaniy po filosofii nauki [The Structure and Development of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science] (pp. 203–269). Moscow, Russia: Progress. (In Russ.)

Lakatos, I. (2011). Fal’sifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel’skikh programm [Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes]. Moscow. Center for Humanitarian Technologies. Retrieved from: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/4369/4370 (Date of access: 03.02.22). (In Russ.)

Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 277.

Lenin, V. I. (1973). Poln. Sobr. Soch. Filosofskie tetradi [Collected Works. Philosophical Notebooks]. Vol. 29. Moscow, Russia: Political Literature Publishing House, 782. (In Russ.)

Luxemburg, R. (1934). Nakoplenie kapitala [The Accumulation of Capital]. Vol. I and II. Moscow, Leningrad, the USSR: Sotsekgiz, 463. (In Russ.)

Mach, E. (2003). Poznanie i zabluzhdenie. Ocherki po psikhologii issledovaniya [Knowledge and Error. Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry]. Moscow, Russia: BINOMIAL. Knowledge Lab, 456. (In Russ.)

Mamchur, E. A. (1987). Problemy sotsial’no-kul’turnoy determinatsii nauchnogo znaniya [Problems of Socio-Cultural Determination of Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 127. (In Russ.)

Marx, K. (1960). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii [Capital. A Critique of Political Economy]. Vol. I. Book I. (pp. 5–907). Moscow, the USSR: State Publishing House for Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Marx, K. (1964). Teorii pribavochnoy stoimosti [Theories of Surplus Value]. Vol. 26, parts 1, 2, 3. Moscow, the USSR: State Publishing House for Political Literature, 674. (In Russ.)

Marx, K. (1968). Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 godov. Vvedenie [Economic Manuscripts 1857–1859. Introduction] (pp. 17–48). Moscow, the USSR: State Publishing House for Political Literature. (In Russ.)

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (2016). Mikroekonomicheskaya teoriya [Micro­economic Theory]. Translated from English under scientific editorship M. I. Levin, E. V. Pokatovich. Moscow, Russia: Delo, 1333. (In Russ.)

Neurath, O. (1983). Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht; Boston; Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 146.

North, D. (1997). Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and economic performance]. Moscow, Russia: Fund of the economic book “Nachala”, 180. (In Russ.)

Orekhovsky, P. A., & Nureev, R. M. (2023). Skholastika v ekonomicheskoy nauke kak simptom neizbezhnogo krizisa [Scholasticism in Economics as a Symptom of an Unavoidable Crisis]. AlterEconomics, 20 (1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.2 (In Russ.)

Poincaré, J. H. (1983). O nauke [About Science]. Moscow, the USSR: Nauka Publ., 560. (In Russ.)

Polterovich, V. M. (2022). Na puti k obshchey teorii sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: k sintezu dvukh kanonov [On the Way to a General Theory of Socio-Economic Development: Towards the Synthesis of Two Canons]. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Issues of economic Theory], 1 (14), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_1_48_57 (In Russ.)

Popper, K. (1983). Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. Izbrannye raboty [The Logic of Scientific Discovery]. Translated from English. Moscow, the USSR: Progress Publ., 605. (In Russ.)

Ricardo, D. (1955). Sochineniya. T. 1: Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [The Works. Vol. 1: Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Russia: State Publishing House for Political Literature, 360. (In Russ.)

Robbins, L. (1993). Predmet ekonomicheskoy nauki [The subject-matter of economics]. THESIS, 1, 10–23. (In Russ.)

Schumpeter, J. A. (2001). Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza [History of Economic Analysis]. In 3 Volumes. Vol. I. Translated from English. St Petersburg, Russia: The School of Economics Publ., 552. (In Russ.)

Stigler, G. (2000). Rikardo i 93 %-naya trudovaya teoriya tsennosti [Ricardo and the 93 % Labor Theory of Value]. Vekhi ekonomicheskoy mysli. Teoriya potrebitel’skogo povedeniya i sprosa [Milestones of Economic Thought. Theory of Consumer Behavior and Demand]. Vol. 3. (pp. 162−177). In V. M. Galperin (Ed.). St Petersburg, Russia: The School of Economics. (In Russ.)

Sсhliсk, M. (1993). O fundamente poznaniya [On the Foundations of Knowledge]. Analiticheskaya filosofiya: izbrannye teksty [Analytic Philosophy: Selected Works] (pp. 33–49). Moscow, Russia: Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)

Toulmin, S. (1984). Chelovecheskoe ponimanie [Human Understanding]. Translated by Z. V. Kaganovа. In P. E. Sivokoyan (Ed.). Moscow, the USSR: Progress, 325. (In Russ.)

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261.

Williamson, O. E. (1996). Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: firmy, rynki, “otnoshencheskaya” kontraktatsiya [The economic institutions of capitalism]. Translated from English by Yu. E. Blagov. In V. S. Katkalo (Ed.). St Petersburg, Russia.: Lenizdat Publ., 702. (In Russ.)

Wittgenstein, L. (1994). O dostovernosti [About credibility]. Filosofskie raboty [Works on Philosophy]. Part 1. (pp. 323–405). Moscow, Russia: Gnozis. (In Russ.)

Wittgenstein, L. (2005). Logiko-filosofskiy traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus]. Izbrannye raboty [Selected Writings] (pp. 14–228). Moscow, Russia: “Territory of the Future” Publ. (In Russ.)

Yulina, N. S. Filosofiya i nauchnoe poznanie [Philosophy and Scientific Knowledge]. Retrieved from: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/ps/ps1/3.pdf (Date of access: 11.05.2022). (In Russ.)