For citation:
Biryukov, V. V. (2025). Alternative Approaches to the Analysis of Property Relations. AlterEconomics, 22(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2025.22-3.1
Abstract:
Contemporary debates increasingly address the problem of understanding property relations. The article shows that many social sciences still draw on a nineteenth-century paradigm, shaped by Hegel, which assumes private owners are guided primarily by selfish interests, producing eclectic institutional interpretations of ownership. Within this framework, the paper highlights major flaws in the dominant liberal (neo-institutional) “bundle of rights” theory, which prioritizes private interests and treats property as an instrumental construct. The article emphasizes the significance of the modern wave of social (unorthodox) property theory, which views ownership as part of broader social relations and underscores the state’s role in shaping institutions to balance interests. Yet it is argued that the classical labor theory of property provides stronger paradigmatic foundations, offering an endogenous understanding of ownership. It rests on the duality of private owners’ interests: while seeking personal benefit, they also use property to produce society’s aggregate product, with society acting as the ultimate owner. This perspective frames public property as the basis of economic relations, resonates with unorthodox notions of deep public ownership, and expands the field of inquiry. It directs attention to the transformation of rights, obligations, and economic institutions in line with societal priorities and an emerging global order.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, procvetaniya i nishchety [Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty]. Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russ.)
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2021). Culture, institutions and social equilibria: A framework. NBER Working Paper No. w28832. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28832
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2022). Non-modernization: Power–culture trajectories and the dynamics of political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 25 (1), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103913
Alexander, G. S. (2018). Property and Human Flourishing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190860745.001.0001
Babie, P., & Viven-Wilksch, J. (Eds.) (2019). Léon Duguit and the Social Obligation Norm of Property: A Translation and Global Exploration. Springer Nature. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7189-9
Balatsky, E. V. (2025). On the Verge of a New Economic Science Paradigm. AlterEconomics, 22 (1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2025.22-1.2 (In Russ.)
Biryukov, V. V. (2023). System Paradigm and Development of Alternative Strategies in Constructing Institutional Economic Theories. AlterEconomics, 20 (3), 505−526. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-3.2 (In Russ.)
Biryukov, V. V. (2024). State and Development of the National Economy as a Complex System: Revising Paradigmatic Foundations. AlterEconomics, 21 (2), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-2.4 (In Russ.)
Bosselmann, K. (2024). Private Property and Public Commons: Narrowing the Gap. Ecological Civilization, 1 (1), 10002. http://dx.doi.org/10.35534/ecolciviliz.2023.10002
Bromley, D. W. (2019). Possessive Individualism: A Crisis of Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
Buzgalin, A. V., & Kolganov, A. I. (2019). Economic development as a change of qualitatively different systems of social and economic relations: To a critique of “pan-institutionalism” and “ideational” approach. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (10), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-99-114 (In Russ.)
Calo, A., Sippel, S. R., Kay, S., Perrin, C., & Shields, K. (2024). Transforming land for sustainable food: Emerging contests to property regimes in the Global North. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 12 (1), 00028. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2024.00028
Chandra, R. (2021). Adam Smith, Allyn Young, Amartya Sen and the Role of the State. History of Economics Review, 78 (1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2020.1863005
Claassen, R. (2024). Property as power: A theory of representation. Journal of Social Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12587
Crawford, C. (2011). The Social Function of Property and the Human Capacity to Flourish. Fordham Law Review, 80 (3), 1089–1134. http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol80/iss3/5 (Date of access: 23.09.2024).
Deakin, S. (2009). Legal Origin, Juridical Form and Industrialization in Historical Perspective: The Case of the Employment Contract and the Joint-Stock Company. Socio-Economic Review, 7 (1), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn019
Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K., & Pistor, K. (2017). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45 (1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.04.005
Dehaibi, L. (2024). Property, Power and Human Rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 282. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035313914
Denisova, E. L., & Borisova, I. D. (2023). Evolution of understanding of the principle of inviolability of private property in modern law. Obrazovanie i pravo [Education and Law], (7), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2023-7-129-132 (In Russ.)
Di Robilant, A. (2023). The Making of Modern Property: Reinventing Roman Law in Europe and its Peripheries 1789–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 380. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859844
Domènech, A., & Bertomeu, M. J. (2015). Property, Freedom and Money: Modern Capitalism Reassessed. European Journal of Social Theory, 19 (2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015600022
Dugi, L. (1919). Obshchie preobrazovaniya grazhdanskogo prava so vremeni kodeksa Napoleona [General transformations of Civil Law since the time of the Code of Napoleon]. Moscow: State Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Egorov, G. V. (2025). Institutional fundamentals of long-run economic development (Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 2024). Voprosy Еkonomiki (1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2025-1-32-43 (In Russ.)
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2024). On the place of socialism in the new world-system. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal], (5), 4–31. (In Russ.)
Grajzl, P., & Murrell, P. (2021a). A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution I: Generating and Interpreting the Estimates. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000326
Grajzl, P., & Murrell, P. (2021b). A Machine-Learning History of English Caselaw and Legal Ideas Prior to the Industrial Revolution II: Applications. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17 (2), 201–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000363
Hegel, G. V. F. (1990). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law] (D. A. Kerimov & V. S. Nersesyants, Ed. & Trans.). Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.)
Herfeld, C., Lisciandra, C., & Martini, C. (2023). The soul of economics: editorial. Journal of Economic Methodology, 30 (2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2023.2209763
Hingl, K., & Shera, M. (2025). Ideas, institutions, and incompleteness. Journal of Institutional Economics, 21, e8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137424000365
Hodgson, G. M. (2015). Much of the ‘economics of property rights’ devalues property and legal rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11 (4), 683–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000630
Hodgson, G. M. (2017). 1688 and All That: Property Rights, the Glorious Revolution and the Rise of British Capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13 (1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000266
Hodgson, G. M. (2021). Financial Institutions and the British Industrial Revolution: Did Financial Underdevelopment Hold Back Growth?. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17 (3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742000065X
Hodgson, G. M. (2022). Culture and institutions: A review of Joel Mokyr’s A Culture of Growth. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18 (1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000588
Jefferies, W, (2021). Marx’s Forgotten Transformation Solution: The Transformation of Values into Prices of Production in Marx’s Grundrisse and Maksakovsky’s the Capitalist Cycle. History of Economics Review, 80 (1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2021.1952004
Kapeliushnikov, R. I. (2019a). Contra pan-institutionalism. Part I. Voprosy ekonomiki (7), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-7-119-146 (In Russ.)
Kapeliushnikov, R. I. (2019b). Contra pan-institutionalism. Part II. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 98–126. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-98-126 (In Russ.)
Kovtun, S. P. (2023). Civil Law and Civil Property in the libertarian theory of law
by V. S. Nersesyants. Social’no-ekonomicheskoe upravlenie: teoriya i praktika, 19 (2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2023-2-49-59 (In Russ.)
Laín, B., & Manjarín, E. (2022). Private, Public and Common: Republican and Socialist Blueprints. Theoria, 69 (171), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2022.6917104
Lametti, D. (2003). The Concept of Property: Relations Through Objects of Social Wealth. University of Toronto Law Journal, 53 (4), 325–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3650892
Locke, J. (1988). Sochineniya [Collected Works] (In 3 vol. Vol. 3). Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 668. (In Russ.)
Martyshin, O. V. (2018). The History of the Generation of the Concept of “State”. Vestnik Universiteta Imeni O. E. Kutafina (MPOA) [Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)], (4), 37−48. https://doi.org/%2010.17803/2311-5998.2018.44.4.037-048 (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1986). Kapital [Capital]. (Vol. 3. Book 3. Part 2). Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russ.)
Marx, K. (1988). Kapital [Capital]. (Vol. 1. Book 1). Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russ.)
Mattei, C. (2022). The Capital Order. How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism. The University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, C. (2021). The future of the Corporation and the economics of purpose. Journal of Management Studies, 58 (3), 887–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12660
McCloskey, D. (2023). The statist neo-institutionalism of Acemoglu and Robinson. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 38 (2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1332/251569121X16197097662211
Mokyr, J. (2018). Bottom up or top-down? The Origins of the Industrial Revolution. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14 (6), 1003–1024. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741700042X
Mualam, N., & Sotto, D. (2020). From Progressive Property to Progressive Cities: Can Socially Sustainable Interpretations of Property Contribute toward Just and Inclusive City-Planning? Global Lessons. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114472
Murtazashvili, I. (2023). Property rights rule: comments on Bart Wilson’s ‘The primacy of property; Or, the subordination of property rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19 (2), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000352
Nili, S. (2019). The Idea of Public Property. Ethics, 129 (2), 344–369. https://doi.org/10.1086/700033
Nili, S. (2023). Philosophizing the indefensible: Strategic political theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872160.001.0001
Nili, S. (2024). Précis of Philosophizing the Indefensible. Analyse & Kritik, 46 (2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2024-2018
North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973). The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2011). Nasilie i sotsial’nye poryadki. Kontseptual’nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis’mennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history]. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing. (In Russ.)
Ogilvie, Sh., & Carus, A. W. (2014). Chapter 8: Institutions and economic growth in historical perspective. Handbook of economic growth, 2, 403–513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00008-3
Polterovich, V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 1. Geography, institutions, or culture?. Voprosy ekonomiki, (11), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-11-5-26 (In Russ.)
Rodrik, D. (2014). When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.1.189
Saad Filho, A. (2019). Value and Crisis: Essays on Labour, Money and Contemporary Capitalism. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393202
Sabri, R., Tabash, M. I., Abousamak, A., Daniel, L. N., & Asadullah, M. (2024). Ownership structures and corporate governance: A systematic analysis. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 13 (1 Special issue), 416–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1siart15
Saudakhanov, M. V. (2021). The social function of private property: the concept and content in the constitutional law of Russia and foreign states. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry [State service and personnel], (5), 101–105. (In Russ.)
Singer, J. W. (2014). Property as the Law of Democracy. Duke Law Journal, 63, 1287–1335.
Smith, A. (2007). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 1056. (In Russ.)
Stoelhorst, J. W., & Vishwanathan, P. (2024). Beyond primacy: A stakeholder theory of corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 49 (1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0268
Terrill, L. (2024). Chapter 15: Property theory’s neglect of non-private property. In C. Bevan (Ed.), Research Handbook on Property, Law and Theory (pp. 231–246). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202069.00023
Valentinov, V. (2023). Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Classical Institutional Economics Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 188 (1), 75–88 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05304-w
Walsh, R. (2021). Property rights and social justice: progressive property in action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108551373