2019 (16), №3

Evaluation of the Cluster Development Effectiveness of a Petrochemical Complex

DOI:

10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.8

For citation: 

Beilin, I. L. (2019). Evaluation of the Cluster Development Effectiveness of a Petrochemical Complex. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(3), 388-401

Abstract:

The article discusses the results of implementing the concept of cluster development of Russian regional economic systems based on approaches of the theory of territorial competition and M. Porter’s agglomeration economy. An assessment of the effectiveness of the petrochemical and chemical cluster of the Republic of Tatarstan as the main factor of regional competitiveness has been made. The data on the increase in the number of enterprises of the regional petrochemical complex and on the increase in the share of private capital in it are analyzed. The economic-statistical information on the results of petrochemical and chemical types of foreign economic activity of the region during the most active functioning of the cluster has been formed. The interdependence of the dynamics of export and import of hydrocarbon raw materials and products with a high value-added cluster is given as an indicator characterizing the competitiveness of petrochemical production and the ability to implement an import substitution program. Based on the econometric and cluster analysis of the data of the foreign economic activity of the Republic of Tatarstan, the fulfillment of the positive effects of the clustering theory in the Association “Non-Profit Partnership ‘Kamsky Innovative Territorial-Production Cluster’ ” has been assessed.

PDF full
Downloaded: 56

Igor Leonidovich Beilin — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University (Kazan, Russian Federation; e-mail: i.beilin@rambler.ru).

Beilin, I. L., & Khomenko, V. V. (2018). Ekonomicheskaya otsenka optimal’noy proizvoditel’nosti innovatsionnogo pred- priyatiya s uchetom tsiklichnosti ego razvitiya [Economic evaluation of optimal performance of innovative enterprises in the light of the cyclical nature of its development]. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Issues of innovative economy], 8(3), 499–512. (In Russ.)

Beilin, I. L. (2012). Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti malogo innovatsionnogo predpriyatiya po FZ 217 [Evaluation of the competitiveness of a small innovative enterprise by the Federal Law of 217]. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Kazan Technological University], 15(21), 173–174. (In Russ.)

Kontorovich, A. E., Korzhubaev, A. G., & Eder, L. V. (2006). Prognoz dobychi uglevodorodov v Rossii, perspektivy eksporta nefti, nefteproduktov i gaza v strany aziatsko-tikhookeanskogo regiona [Forecast of hydrocarbon production in Russia, prospects for the export of oil, oil products, and gas to the countries of the Asia-Pacific region]. Mineral’nye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Mineral Resources of Russia. Economics and Management], 4, 63–69. (In Russ.)

Prosalova, V. S. (2016). Printsipy strategicheskogo upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nost’yu klastera [Principles of strategic management of innovative activities of a cluster]. Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya [Successes of modern science and education], 7, 43–55. (In Russ.)

Bardi, U. (2005). The mineral economy: a model for the shape of oil production curves. Energy Policy, 33, 53–61. Beilin, I. L. (2016). Analysis of efficiency of the innovative project in the field of chemistry fuzzy logic. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Re-search, 17(3), 177–185.

Beilin, I. L. (2017). Economic-mathematical modeling of the total costs of innovative chemical enterprise methods of fuzzy set theory. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(19), 4865–4869.

Beilin, I. L., & Arkhireev, V. P. (2011). The supermolecular structure of new copolymer products based on cyclic car- bonates. International Polymer Science and Technology, 38(1), 37–40.

Fan, J. P. H. (2009). Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: China versus the Rest of the World. World Development, 37(4), 852–865.

Gokalp, M. F., & Yildirim, A. (2016). Institutions and Economic Performance: A Review on the Developing Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, 347–359.

Hou, K., Luke Chan, M. W., Li, X., & Mountaina, D. C. (2014). Foreign direct in-vestment and its determinants: A re- gional panel causality analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 54, 579–589.

Isard, W., & Han, S. H. (2008). Mediation Analysis: The Use of Regional Science Methods to Resolve Conflicts. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 13(2), 1–13.

Isard, W. (2005). Industry-Services Complex Analysis for Poverty Region Development (Realistic Development Theory for Regions Emerging from Poverty). Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 11(1). DOI: https://doi. org/10.2202/1554–8597.1081

Krautkraemer, J. A. (1998). Nonrenewable resource scarcity. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 2065–2107.

Maza, A., & Villaverde, J. (2015). The determinants of inward foreign direct in-vestment: Evidence from the European regions. International Business Review, 24, 209–223.

Moore, J. F. (1996). The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. N.Y.: Harper Business.

Pickett, M. C. (2004). Sustainable Growth Modeling: A longitudinal Analysis of Harley-Davidson. INC proceeding of ASBBS, 1(15), 920–925.

Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. (2006, December). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 78–92.

Porter, M. E. (2008, January). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 79–93. Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015, October). How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Companies. Harvard Business Review, 97–114.

Porter, M. E. & Heppelmann, J. E. (2017, November). Why Every Organization Needs an Augmented Reality Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 46–62.

Reynolds, D. B. (2002, June). Using non-time series to determine supply elasticity: How far do prices change the Hubbert curve? OPEC Review, 147–167.

Srholec, M. (2011). A multilevel analysis of innovation in developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1539–1569.

Tintin, C. (2013). The determinants of foreign direct investment inflows in the Central and Eastern European Countries: The importance of institutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46, 287–298.

Zhang, H. (2015). How does agglomeration promote the product innovation of Chinese firms? China Economic Review, 35, 105–120.

Wooldridge, J. (2008). Introductory Econometrics — A Modern Approach. Washington: ECON, 910.