2020 (17), №2

Institutional Prerequisite of the Recycling in the Region: Problems and Prospects

For citation: 

Moseyko, V. V. (2020). Institutional Prerequisite of the Recycling in the Region: Problems and Prospects. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17 (2), 466-475

Abstract:

There is the analysis of waste management in Russia and the Kaliningrad region in this research. The purpose of the research is to identify institutional barriers to the recycling of waste. The author used information and analytical materials of official authorities, as well as environmental organizations. It is shown that the possibilities of separate collection of waste and recycling are limited by the characteristics of property relations. We have found that the low level of property rights’ specification and the spread of the common property regime lead to the strengthening of opportunistic strategies of economic agents and the emergence of a “tragedy of commons”. We identify that the increase in transaction costs of recyclers as a result of the customs service’s activities leads to the formation of the category of «anti-property» in relation to waste generated in the Kaliningrad region. The article shows that the features of the property specification form a system of incentives for economic agents in the field of waste management. The conclusions and suggestions formulated in this paper can be used in developing the environmental policy of Russia and the Kaliningrad region.

PDF full
Downloaded: 30

Viktoriya Vladimirovna Moseyko — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory, Institute of Industrial Economics and Management, Kaliningrad State Technical University (Kaliningrad, Russian Federation; e-mail: vimoseiko@gmail.com).

Bowles, S. (2017). Moral’naya ekonomika. Pochemu khoroshie stimuly ne zamenyat khoroshikh grazhdan [The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens]. Translated from English by D. Shestakova. Moscow, Russia: Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara, 336.

Dudin, M., Kalendzhyan, S., & Lyasnikov, N. (2017). «Zelenaya ekonomika»: prakticheskiy vektor ustoychivogo razvitiya Rossii [“Green Economy”: Practical Vector of Sustainable Development of Russia]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 12(2), 86–99.

Zibert, Kh. (2003). Effekt kobry: Kak izbezhat’ zabluzhdeniy v politike [The effect of the cobra: How to avoid misconceptions in politics]. Translated from German. In I. P. Grebennikov (Eds.). SPb. Russia: SPbGUEF, 244.

Medouz, D., et al. (1991). Predely rosta [The limits to growth]. Translated from English by G. A. Yagodin. Moscow, Russia: Izdvo MGU, 208.

Mkrtchyan, G. M., & Tagaeva, T. O. (2012). Ekologicheskaya politika: na puti k ustoychivomu razvitiyu [environmental policy: towards sustainable development]. EKO [ECO], 7, 119–135.

Moseyko, V. V., & Moseyko T. V. (2016). Teoriya i praktika predprinimatel’stva [The theory and practice of entrepreneurship]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 1, 64–69.

Moseyko, V. V. (2019). Upravlenie otkhodami: ekonomicheskiy analiz [Waste management: economic analysis]. Baltiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [The Baltic economic journal], 1 (25), 55–64.

Odintsova, M. I. (2009). Institutsional’naya ekonomika: ucheb. Posobie [Institutional Economics: handbook], 3rd edition. Moscow, Russia: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta — Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 397.

Olson, M. (1995). Logika kollektivnykh deystviy: Obshchestvennye blaga i teoriya grupp [The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups]. Moscow, Russia: Fond Ekonomicheskoy Initsiativy, 165.

Tsutskareva, G. I. (2018). (Eds.) Retsikling resursov: pervyy shag k ekologicheskomu sotsializmu [Resource recycling: the first step towards ecological socialism]. Collection of articles. Moscow, Russia: URSS: LENAND, 426.

Rybal’chenko, I. V., & Rozina, N.V. (2019). Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie razdel’nym sborom musora kak instrument ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti [State and municipal management of separate garbage collection as a tool of economic efficiency]. Ekologicheskiy vestnik Rossii [Ecological Bulletin of Russia], 4, 32–39.

Smith, A. (1997). Teoriya nravstvennykh chuvstv [The Theory of Moral Sentiments]. Moscow, Russia: Respublika, 351.

Soto, H. de. (2004). Zagadka kapitala. Pochemu kapitalizm torzhestvuet na Zapade i terpit porazhenie vo vsem ostal’nom mire [The Mystery of Capital Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West]. Translated from English. Moscow, Russia: ZAO «Olimp- Biznes», 272.

Efremenko, D. V. (2014). (Eds.). Sotsial’naya solidarnost’ i al’truizm: Sotsiologicheskaya traditsiya i sovremennye mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya [Social solidarity and altruism: Sociological tradition and modern interdisciplinary research]. Collestion of scientific works. Moscow, Russia: RAN. INION. Tsentr sotsial. nauch.-inform. issled. Otd. sotsiologii i sotsial. Psikhologii, 284.

Thaler, R. (2018). Novaya povedencheskaya ekonomika: pochemu lyudi narushayut pravila traditsionnoy ekonomiki i kak na etom zarabotat’ [The new behavioral economy: why do people break the rules of traditional Economics and how to make money from it]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 384.

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for «Lemons»: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. DOI: 10.2307/1879431.

Berger, S., & Lester, R. K. (2015). Global Taiwan: Building competitive strengths in a new international economy. Routledge, 368.

Brown, С., & Block, W. (2019). Free Market for the Environment. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 1, 116–125.

Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1, 1–44. DOI: 10.1086/466560.

Gneezy, Uri, & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine is a Price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29:1, 1–17. DOI: 10.1086/468061.

Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science. New Series, 162: 3859. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.

Heller, M. (1998). Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review, 111: 3, 621–688. DOI: 10.2307/1342203.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons, 608.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Published by the press syn- dicate of the University of Cambridge, 280.

Titmuss, R. M. (1970). The Gift Relationship. From Human Blond to Social Policy. London: London School of Economics Books, 360.

Williamson, O. (1985). Behavioral Assumptions. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. N.Y.: The Free Press. 1985, 44–52.