2020 (17), №4

Economic and Legal Aspects of the Import Substitution Policy in Agriculture in Russia

For citation: 

Bersenev, V. L. (2020). Economic and Legal Aspects of the Import Substitution Policy in Agriculture in Russia. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17 (4), 922-931.

Abstract:

Import substitution has become a key factor in the transition of the Russian economy to innovation-driven development. Apart from everything else, the results of testing of the Prebisch — Singer hypothesis point to the need for this transition. The article considers theoretical and legal aspects of Russia’s import substitution policy in agriculture. This sector depends on natural and climatic conditions, it is also characterized by seasonality of production processes and it uses animals and plants as resources for production. Therefore, extraordinary measures are required to organize import substitution in this sphere. Moreover, in accordance with Engel’s law, it is necessary to ensure not only the country’s food independence but also the high quality of agricultural production. To this end, the main principles of import substitution should be enshrined in federal legislation. In this case, the interests of national agricultural producers will be better protected from changes in the political environment.

PDF full
Downloaded: 40

Vladimir Leonidovich Bersenev — Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Leading Research Associate, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: colbers@bk.ru).

Animitsa, Ye. G., Animitsa, P. Ye., & Glumov, A. A. (2015). Importozameshcheniye v promyshlennom proizvodstve regiona: kontseptual’no-teoreticheskiye i prikladnyie aspekty [Import Substitution in Regional Industrial Production: Theoretical and Practical Aspects].  Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 3,  160–172. (In Russ.)

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1995).  Sotsial’noye konstruirovaniye real’nosti: Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge].  Moscow, Russia: Medium, 323. (In Russ.)

Bodrunov, S. D. (2015).  Teoriya i praktika importozameshcheniya: uroki i problem [The Theory and Practice of Import Substitution: Lessons and Problems].  Sankt-Peterburg, Russia: INIR im. S. Yu. Vitte, 171. (In Russ.)

Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (2013).  Povedencheskaya ekonomika i novyi paternalism [Behavioral Economics and new Paternalism],  available at: https://polit.ru/article/2013/11/12/paternalism/ (accessed: 26.08.2020). (In Russ.)

Osipov, A. N., Gasanova, H. N., Veselovskiy, M. Ya., Osipov, V. S., & Gnezdova, Yu. V. (2018). Importozameshcheniye v sel’skom khoziaistve: krizisy pereproizvodstva, vybor institutsional’noi politiki, primeneniye povedencheskoi ekonomiki [Import substitution in agriculture: overproduction crises, choice of institutional policy, application of behavioural economics].  APK: ekonomika, upravleniye [AIC: Economics, Management], 1,  11–21. (In Russ.)

Papelo, & V., Kovtun, B. (2016). Prodovol’stvennoye samoobespecheniye regionov i razvitiye sel’skikh territoriy [Regional food self-sufficiency and rural development].  APK: ekonomika, upravleniye [AIC: Economics, Management], 2,  72–80. (In Russ.)

Anker, R. (2011). Engel’s Law around the World 150 years later.  Working paper series. Political Economy Research Institute, 247,  1–45.

Arezki, R., Hadri, K., Loungani, P., & Rao, Y. (2013). Testing the Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis since 1650: Evidence from Panel Techniques that Allow for Multiple Breaks.  IMF Working Paper, 180,  37.

Bruton, H. (1989). Import Substitution.  Handbook of Development Economics. In H. Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (Eds.), 2,  1601–1644.

Clements, K.W., & Si, J. (2018). Engels Law, Diet Diversity, and the Quality of Food Consumption.  American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(1),  1–22.

Dijk T.A. van. (1998).  Ideology: A multidisciplinary Approach.  London: SAGE Publications, 365.

Jensen, R., & Miller, N. (2007). Giffen Behavior: Theory and Evidence.  NBER Working Paper, 13243,  available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w13243 (accessed: 24.08.2020).

North, D. (1989). Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction.  World Development, 17 (9),  1319–1332.

Prebisch, R. (1950).  The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems.  United Nations Department of Economic Affairs, Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA), New York, 59.

Singer, H. (1950). The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries.  American Economic review. Papers and Proceedings, 40(2),  473–485.