2020 (17), №4

The Development of Industrial Leadership Theory: the Role of Intellectual Resources

For citation: 

Molodchik, M. A., Votintseva, N. N., Suvorov, S. A., & Zavertyaeva, M. A. (2020). The Development of Industrial Leadership Theory: the Role of Intellectual Resources. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17 (4), 891-903.

Abstract:

This paper reviews academic papers discussing the concept of leapfrogging and aims to systematize studies in the field of industrial leadership theory, in particular in relation to the role of intellectual resources. The study applies bibliometric analysis of relevant literature and critical analysis of successful cases with regard to industrial leadership due to leapfrogging. Historical analysis of the origin of the term ‘leapfrogging’ shows that it first appeared in industrial organization in the context of patent race models and was later developed in the fields of international competition and theory of the firm. In order to test the hypothesis that intellectual resources play the leading role in the success of leapfrogging, we provide brief outlines of case studies from such industries as steel, wine, and video game consoles. Bibliometric analysis of the leading scientific citation databases revealed a recent increase in the number of academic papers discussing leapfrogging. American universities account for the largest share of such publications. The most prolific author in this respect is Keun Lee. A review of the papers published in the last ten years revealed a tendency to analyze successful cases of leapfrogging by using three windows of opportunities: technological, demand, and institutional.

PDF full
Downloaded: 28

Mariya Anatolyevna Molodchik — PhD in Economics, Senior Researcher, International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Perm, Russian Federation; e-mail: mmolodchik@hse.ru).

Nadezhda Nikolaevna Votintseva — Research assistant, International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Perm, Russian Federation; e-mail: nnvotintseva@edu.hse.ru).

Sergey Andreyevich Suvorov — Research assistant, International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Perm, Russian Federation; e-mail: sasuvorov_1@edu.hse.ru).

Marina Aleksandrovna Zavertyayeva — PhD in Economics, Research Fellow, International Laboratory of Intangible-driven Economy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Perm, Russian Federation; e-mail: moskolkova@hse.ru).

Boyko, I. V. (2015).  Osnovy innovatsionnogo razvitiya i novoy ekonomiki: ucheb. posobiye [Foundations of innovative development and new economy].  St. Petersburg, Russia: ITMO University, 125. (In Russ.)

Dement’ev, V. E. (2008). Strategiya operezheniya v usloviyakh oligopol’noy konkurentsii na rynkakh novoy produktsii [Forward strategy in oligopoly competition in the markets of new product].  Teoriya i praktika institu-tsional’nykh preobrazovaniy v Rossii [Theory and practice of institutional transformations in Russia], 10.  Moscow, Russia: TsEMI RAN, 157. (In Russ.)

Kovalev, Yu. Yu. (2015). Innovatsionnye sistemy ekonomiki stran BRIK [Innovative Systems of Economy in the BRIC Countries].  Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya [Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya], 1,  35–47. DOI 10.15356/0373–2444–2015–1-35–47 (In Russ.)

Trushin, I. S., & Kovalenko, A. I. (2015). Krugozor absorbtsii kak klyuchevoy faktor diffuzii innovatsiy [Horizon of absorption as a key factor in the diffusion of innovations].  Sovremennaya konkurentsiya [Modern competition], 4,  100–116. (In Russ.)

Jardon, C. M., Molodchik, M. A. et al. (2019). Intellektual’nye resursy rossiyskogo malogo biznesa: pryamoe i kosvennoe vliyanie na rezul’taty deyatel’nosti [Intellectual capital of Russian small companies: indirect and direct impact on performance].  Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(1),  75–90. DOI 10.31063/2073–6517/2019.16–1.7 (In Russ.)

Athreye, S., & Godley, A. (2009). Internationalization and technological leapfrogging in the pharmaceutical industry.  Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2),  295–323. DOI:10.1093/icc/dtp002.

Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries.  Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2),  157–210. DOI:10.1093/icc/2.2.157.

Binz, C., Truffer, B., Li, L., Shi, Y., & Lu, Y. (2012). Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: the case of onsite wastewater treatment in China.  Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79,  155–171. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016.

Brezis, E. S., Krugman, P. R., &Tsiddon, D. (1993). Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technological leadership.  American Economic Review, 83(5),  1211–1219.

Cho, D.-S., Kim, D.-J., & Rhee, D. K. (1998). Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea.  Organization Science, 9,  489–505. DOI:10.1287/orsc.9.4.489.

Church, J. R., & Ware, R. (2000).  Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach.  Boston: Irwin McGraw Hill, 960.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.  Administrative Science Quarterly, 35,  128–152. DOI: 10.2307/2393553.

Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997).  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations.  London: Pinter Publishers, 432.

Fudenberg, D., Gilbert, R., Stiglitz, J., & Tirole, J. (1983). Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races.  European Economic Review, 22(1),  3–31.

Jomo, K. S. (2005).  Manufacturing Competitiveness in Asia: How Internationally Competitive National Firms and Industries Developed in East Asia.  London: Routledge, 240.

Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries.  Research Policy, 30,  459–483. DOI: 10.1016/S0048–7333(00)00088–3.

Lee, K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems.  Research Policy, 46(2),  338–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006.

Marques, P. (2017). Human capital and university–business interactions: an example from the wine industry.  Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4,  154–160. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2017.1341818.

McCarthy, D. J., Puffer, S. M., Graham, L. R., & Satinsky, D. M. (2014). Emerging Innovation in Emerging Economies: Can Institutional Reforms Help Russia Break Through Its Historical Barriers?  Thunderbird International Business Review, 56,  243–260. DOI: 10.1002/tie.21619.

Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (1999).  Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries.  New York: Cambridge University Press, 420.

Mu, Q., & Lee, K. (2005). Knowledge Diffusion, Market Segmentation and Technological Catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China.  Research Policy, 34,  759–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.007.

Schilling, M. A. (2003). Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the US video game console industry.  California Management Review, 45(3),  6–32. DOI: 10.2307/41166174.

Shy, O. (1995).  Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications.  Cambridge: MIT Press, 466.

Soete, L. (1985). International diffusion of technology, industrial development and technological leapfrogging.  World Development, 13,  409–422. DOI: 10.1016/0305–750X(85)90138-X.

Tukker, A. (2005). Leapfrogging into the future: Developing for sustainability.  International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 1,  65–84. DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2005.008087.

Williamson, P. J., Ramamurti, R., Fleury, A., & Fleury, M. T. L. (2013).  The Competitive Advantage of Emerging Market Multinationals.  New York: Cambridge University Press, 377.