2019 (16), №2

Principle of Rationality in Behavioural Economics

9

DOI:

10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-2.4

For citation: 

Ilyukhin, A. A., Ponomareva, S. I., & Ilyukhina, S. V. (2019). Principle of Rationality in Behavioural Economics. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(2), 214-224

Abstract:

This article is devoted to the study of the rational choice theory in the development of behavioural economics. The aim of this study is to research the principle of rationality in behavioural economics as an immanent part of a person model and to define practical forms of its application. The methodological framework of this research includes basic concepts of the rational choice theory and behavioural economics. General scientific methods have been used in this study: method of comparison, systemic analysis, systematization of information and expert assessments. Theoretical and methodological foundations for the interpretation of the “rationality” concept in economic science are revealed. The conventional economic term «rationality» is noted to be ambivalent. Basic concepts and ideas on which the principle of rationality is based in economics are analyzed in terms of their changes. The conclusion is drawn on the relevant use of a rationality concept only in a certain context. This methodological rationale determined a special authorial approach to the analysis of the principle of rationality which is considered as a component of a person model in behavioural economics. Perspectives of modification of the principle of rationality are shown in the light of the modern development of behavioural and experimental economics. The emergence of new and alternative concepts is viewed as a positive result of the critical evaluation of the analyzed principle. Thus, it is found viable to complement the traditional methodology and the rational choice theory with the achievements of behavioural economics, neuroeconomics, and other interdisciplinary sciences. Methodological and applied framework for the selection of the criterion of the rational choice in behavioural economics is revealed. The principle of rationality developed by behavioural economics is claimed to be of use in theoretical justification of “behavioural policy” and its practical implementation offered by the national government.

PDF full
Downloaded: 32

Alexey Alexandrovich Ilyukhin — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Political Economy, Ural State University of Economics (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: iluhiaa@usue.ru).

Svetlana Ivanovna Ponomareva — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Political Economy, Ural State University of Economics (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: PonomarevaSI@e1.ru).

Svetlana Viktorovna Ilyukhina — PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology and Statistics, Ural State University of Economics (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: iluhisv@usue.ru).

  1. Akerlof, Dzh., & Shiller, R. (2010). Spiritus Animalis, ili kak chelovecheskaya psikhologiya upravlyayet ekonomikoy [Spiritus Animalis or how human psychology controls economy]. Moscow, Russia: LLC “United Press”. (In Russ.)
  2. Avtonomov, V. S. (2015). Na kakiye svoystva cheloveka mozhet operet’sya ekonomicheskiy liberalism [On which personal traits can the economic liberalism rely]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 8, 5–24. (In Russ.)
  3. Avtonomov, V. S. (2017). Postoyannaya i peremennaya ratsional’nost’ kak predposylka ekonomicheskoy teorii [Constant and variable rationality as a prerequisite of economic theory]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New economic association], 1, 142–146. (In Russ.)
  4. Belyanin, A. V. (2017). Litsom k cheloveku: dostizheniya i vyzovy povedencheskoy ekonomiki [Facing human: achieve- ments and challenges of behavioural economics]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New economic association], 2, 166–175. (In Russ.)
  5. Belyanin, A. V. (2017). Homo oeconomicus i Homo postoeconomicus [Homo oeconomicus and Homo postoeconomi- cus]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New economic association], 1, 157–161. (In Russ.)
  6. Dyatel, E. P., & Golomolzina, N. V. (2015). Tsennost’ al’ternativy (v poryadke obsuzhdeniya stat’i V. M. Efimova “Iskhodnyy institutsionalizm i ekonomicheskoye obrazovaniye”) [Value of an alternative (discussing an article by V. M. Yefimov “Initial institutionalism and economic education”)]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], 3(59), 6–12. (In Russ.)
  7. Zaostrovtsev, A. P. (2017). O ratsional’noy irratsional’nosti [On rational irrationality]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New economic association], 1, 151–156. (In Russ.)
  8. Ilyukhin, A. A., & Ilyukhina, S. V. (2018). Ekonomika schast’ya: rol’, vzglyady i otsenki molodezhi [The Economy of Happiness: Role, Opinions and Evaluations by Young People]. Upravlenets [The Manager], 9(2), 12–17. DOI: 10.29141/2218– 5003–2018–9-2–3. (In Russ.)
  9. Kaneman, D., & Tverski, A. (2003). Ratsional’nyy vybor, tsennosti i freymy [Rational choice, values and frames]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 4, 31–42. (In Russ.)
  10. Kaneman, D. (2014). Dumay medlenno… reshay bistro [Thinking, Fast and Slow]. Moscow, Russia: AST. (In Russ.)
  11. Kapelyushnikov, R. (2017). Status printsipa ratsional’nosti v ekonomicheskoy teorii: proshloye i nastoyashcheye [The status of the principle of rationality in economic theory: the past and the present]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New economic association], 1, 162–166. (In Russ.)
  12. Kapelyushnikov, R. (2018). Povedencheskaya ekonomika: neskol’ko kommentariyev o ratsional’nosti i irratsional’nosti [Behavioural economics: several comments on rationality and irrationality]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of the New economic association], 3, 359–376. (In Russ.)
  13. Komarova, O. V. (2018). Formirovaniye obshchestvennykh prioritetov razvitiya v ekonomicheskoy nauke [Formation of public priorities of development in economic science]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 15(2), 177–181. (In Russ.)
  14. Ponomareva, S. I. (2013). Formirovaniye novogo tipa ratsional’nosti v ekonomicheskom znanii [Formation of the new type of rationality in economic knowledge]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Journal of the Ural State University of Economics], 2, 6–11. (In Russ.)
  15. Ponomareva, S. I. (2018). Normativnyye ustanovki povedencheskoy ekonomiki i formy “povedencheskoy” politiki [Regulations of behavioural economics and forms of “behavioural” policy]. Upravlenets [The Manager], 3, 14–19. (In Russ.) Saymon, G. (1993). Ratsional’nost’ kak protsess i produkt myshleniya [Rationality as the process and product of thinking]. THESIS [THESIS], 3, 16–38. (In Russ.)
  16. Saymon, G. (2000). Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy v ekonomicheskoy teorii i nauke o povedenii [The theory of decision-making in economic theory and behavioural science]. In V. M. Gal’perin (ed.), Vekhi ekonomicheskoy mysli. Tom 2. Teoriya firmy [Milestones of economic thought. Volume 2. Theory of firm]. SPb: Economic school. (In Russ.)
  17. Taler, R., & Sansteyn, K. (2017). Arkhitektura vybora. Kak uluchshit’ nashi resheniya o zdorov’ye, blagosostoyanii i schast’ye [Nudge. The architecture of choice. How to improve our decisions on health, welfare and happiness]. Moscow, Russia: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russ.)
  18. Taler, R. (2017). Novaya povedencheskaya ekonomika. Pochemu lyudi narushayut pravila traditsionnoy ekonomiki i kak na etom zarabotat’ [New behavioural economics. Why people violate rules of traditional economics and how to make money out of it]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo Publ. (In Russ.)
  19. Shastitko, A. A. (2016). Povedencheskaya ekonomika: primeneniye metodov kognitivnoy psikhologii v ekonomike [Behavioural economics: application of methods of cognitive psychology in economics]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity], 2, 132–141. (In Russ.)
  20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263– 291.
  21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  22. Simon, H. A. (1971). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, in Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
  23. Simon, H. A. (1955). Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
  24. Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159– 1202.
  25. Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
  26. Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(1), 199–214.

Tags: