For citation:
Sukharev, O. S. (2019). Economic Consumption Theory: Types, Properties and Useful Goods. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(1), 60-74
Abstract:
The problem of the development of modern economic theory of consumer goods is investigated, taking into account that neoclassical views cease to be relevant for certain types of goods, namely positional goods, information, knowledge, and “cultural goods”. The properties of public, private, and quasi-public goods are specified. A proposed utility function for information will disallow the opposing issue of social and individual utility, which is indicative of the “mainstream”. The existence of various types of goods and a high variety of goods present a difficulty in creating a unified goods theory that would integrate consumption effects and utility assessment for all goods. A basic equation that binds marginal and total utility of individual and social goods is introduced. Neoclassical analysis factors out institutes that connect utility distribution. Within the framework of the presented equation, opposition or separation of social and individual interests in that case is deemed a conditional model in the theory of consumer goods and has weak factual foundations. Several public goods (national security) are characterized by consumer delay and are created in reserve. It is shown that cost disease does not touch upon all types of “cultural goods” because, in the institutional sense, the identification of cost disease occurs during cost estimation and price determination, i.e. depends on institutional conditions. Cost behavior does not always outpace price dynamics. In the field of “cultural goods” of show business, there is a possibility of significant investments and a fairly quick return, which makes this kind of “cultural” business highly profitable for both performers and owners.
Fedorenko, N. P. (Ed.) (1972). In Informacija i modeli struktur upravlenija [Information and management structure models]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 336. (In Russ.)
Rubinshtejn, A. Ya. (2009). K teorii rynkov opekaemyh blag. Opekaemye blaga i ih mesto v jekonomicheskoj teorii [On market theory of patronized goods. Patronized goods and their place in economic theory]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and modernity], 1, 139–153. (In Russ.)
Rubinshtejn, A. Ya. (2012). Opekaemye blaga v sfere kul’tury: priznaki i posledstvija «bolezni cen» [Patronized goods in the cultural field: features and consequences of cost disease]. Moscow, Russia: Institut jekonomiki RAN, 78. (In Russ.)
Stigler, Dzh. (1995). Jekonomicheskaja teorija informacii [Economic theory of information]. In Teorija firmy. Vehi jekonomicheskoj mysli [Firm theory. Landmarks of economic thought] (No. 2, pp. 507–529). St. Petersburg, Russia: Jekonomicheskaja shkola. (In Russ.)
Stiglic, Dzh. (2005). Informacija i izmenenie paradigmy jekonomicheskoj teorii [Information and paradigm shift of economic theory]. In Mirovaja jekonomicheskaja mysl’. Lekcii Nobelevskih laureatov [Worldwide economic thought. Lectures of Nobel Prize winners] (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 535–629). Moscow, Russia: Mysl’. (In Russ.)
Sukharev, O. S. (2015). Informacionnaja jekonomika: znanie, konkurencija i rost [Information economy: knowledge, competition and growth]. Moscow, Russia: Finansy i statistika, 288. (In Russ.)
Jerrou, K. (2004). Kollektivnyj vybor i individual’nye cennosti [Collective choice and individual values]. Moscow, Russia: GU VShJe Publ., 204. (In Russ.)
Baigent, N. (1981). Social choice and merit goods. Economics Letters, 7(4), 301–305.
Baumol, W. J. & Bowen, W. G. (1966). Performing Arts. The Economic Dilemma. A study of Problems common to Theater, Opera, Music and Dance. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund, xvi, 582.
Baumol, W. J. (1993). Health Care, Education and the Cost Disease: A Looming Crisis for Public Choice. Public Choice, 77(1), 17–28.
Baumol, W. J. (2010). The Two-sided Cost Disease and Its Frightening Consequences. In F. Gallouj & F. Djellal (Eds.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services: A Multi-disciplinary Perspective (Ch. 4, pp. 84–92). Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Feltovich, N. & Ejebu, O-Z. (2014). Do positional goods inhibit saving? Evidence from a life-cycle experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107B, 440–454.
Fiorito, R. & Kollintzas, T. (2004). Public goods, merit goods, and the relation between private and government consumption. European Economic Review, 48(6), 1367–1398.
Hirsch, F. (1977). Social Limits to Growth. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 208.
Machlup, F. (1982). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 220.
Porat, M. (1977). The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, 319.
Schneider, M. (2007). The Nature, History and Significance of the Concept of Positional Goods. History of Economics Review, 45(1), 60–81.
Seo, S. N. (2017). The Theory of Public Goods and Their Efficient Provisions. In The Behavioral Economics of Climate Change, 33–64.
Solnick, S. J., Hong, L. & Hemenway, D. (2007). Positional goods in the United States and China. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(4), 537–545.
Tamai, T. (2018). Dynamic provision of public goods under uncertainty. Economic Modelling, 68, 409–415.