DOI:
10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.22
For citation:
Nadeina, E. A. (2019). Solvency of the Management System as Competitiveness Factor of the Industrial Enterprise. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(4), 856-861
Abstract:
The relevance of this article is caused by the fact that in modern conditions of managing it is harder and harder to Russian industrial enterprises to keep positions of steady functioning and to provide competitive coexistence. Therefore development of administrative approach to formation and deduction of the competitive status of the enterprise as which basic studied element serves the solvency of a system of management became the purpose of this article. For this purpose the author specified a basic definition that act as its indicative indicators compatibility, stability and social-eсological-economic effectiveness of management decisions reached provided that the functional model of management of the enterprise has balance of the purposes, functions and results. Besides, the author developed and approved the technique of estimation of level of solvency of a system of management using the Pareto principle at justification of threshold estimated values and allowing on the example of one of the leading defense enterprises of the Ural region including, to identify influence of required level of solvency on competitiveness of the organization. The results received by the author demonstrate that the solvency of a system of management serves as a factor of competitiveness of the enterprise, only, if management decisions have triple balance.
Belyaev, A. (2019). «Rost proizvodstva grazhdanskoy produkcii ne perekryvaet po vyruchke snizhenie po special’noy tehnike» [«Increase in production of civil products does not block on revenue decrease on the special equipment»]. Kommersant [Businessman], available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4054681 (accessed 09.09.2019).
Golikov, N. A. (2014). Social’naya sostoyatel’nost’ kak indikator kachestva obrazovaniya [Social solvency as education quality indicator]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [Philosophy of Education], 1 (52), 19–26. (In Russ.)
Danilov-Danilian, V. I. (2003). Ustoychivoe razvitie (teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz) [Sustainable Development (Theoretical and Methodological Analysis)]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], 39(2), 123–135. (In Russ.)
Kabanov, A. V. (2008). Problemy sostoyatel’nosti organizacionno-upravlencheskih resheniy pri reformirovanii stroitel’noy otrasli [Problems of validity of organizational and management decisions at the reform of the construction industry]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], 44(1), 119–123. (In Russ.)
Merzlikina, G. S. (2011). Ekonomicheskaya sostojatel’nost’: ocenka i upravlenie [Economic solvency: assessment and management]. Vestnik AGTU. Ser.: Ekonomika [Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics], 1, 40–45. (In Russ.)
Myslyakova, Yu. G., & Kislov, R. S. (2016). Sushhnost’ innovacionnoy sostoyatel’nosti naukoemkogo biznesa v usloviyah novoy industrializacii [The essence of the innovative solvency of high technology business in the context of new industrialization]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Samara State University of Economics], 1 (135), 61–65. (In Russ.)
Nashe obshhee budushhee. (1989). Doklad Mezhdunarodnoy komissii po okruzhayushhey srede i razvitiyu [Our common future. Report of the International Commission on Environment and Development]. Moscow, Russia: Progress,10. (In Russ.) Romanchin, V. I., & Romanchin, S. V. (2005). Social’no ekonomicheskaya sostoyatel’nost’ organizaciy: pokazateli i kompleksnaya ocenka [Socio-economic constitution of organizations: indicators and integrated evaluation]. Imushhestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii [Property Relations in the Russian Federation], 3 (42), 51–60. (In Russ.)
Shehovceva, L. S. (2001). Konkurentosposobnost’ regiona: faktory i metod sozdaniya [The competitiveness of the region: factors and method of creation]. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom [Marketing in Russia and Abroad], 4, 98. (In Russ.)
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 171–180.