2019 (16), №4

Institutional Transformation of Intellectual Products Protection under the Conditions of Digitalization

DOI:

10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.13

For citation: 

Volkova, T. I., & Usoltsev, I. A. (2019). Institutional Transformation of Intellectual Products Protection under the Conditions of Digitalization. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(4), 770-782

Abstract:

The intensification of international competition for technological leadership and the development of digital technologies exacerbate the problem of institutional protection of intellectual products (IP), including intellectual property items (IPI). This complex and interdisciplinary problem has not been sufficiently studied, especially taking into account the rapid development of digital technologies. The article investigates issues associated with identification and justification of the critical elements possessing a multifaceted and specific endogenous potential in the demanded transformation of the IP protection system. Such a formulation of the problem reflects the authors’ scientific contribution. The research methodology consisted in a dialectical synthesis of reproductive and interdisciplinary methodology. Such a methodological approach was selected due to the specific nature of such categories as IP, IPI, commercialisation and digital technology categories, which reflect the unity of socio-economic and economic-legal relations. Research methodology was also based on the system analysis, analytical-epistemological, economic-legal, structural-logical, statistical grouping and comparative estimates methods. The proposed methodology was adequate to the analysis of the process of digital technology application. The empirical basis included the factual and statistical material retrieved from recognised databases and legal acts of different levels. The obtained results can be used for the development of managerial mechanisms, regulatory and legal documents, as well as the preparation of high-level specialists and experts in the field of IP protection. However, the development of effective IPI protection instruments in Russia requires further in-depth studies of the approaches to IPI protection in leading countries.

PDF full
Downloaded: 37

Tat’yana Ivanovna Volkova — Doctor in Economics, Associate Professor, Departmental Head, Institutional Economics Sector, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: randall@bk.ru).

Ivan Aleksandrovich Usoltsev — Loan Officer, Sberbank of Russia PJSC (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: nino34@yandex.ru).

Ageev, A. I., Avdeev, S. V., Novotochinov, A. A., Ryzhov, V. A., & Fadeeva, T. I. (2016). Institut superdrayverov — instrument novoy innovatsionnoy real’nosti [Super Drivers Institute — a tool for new innovative reality]. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 8, 38–50. (In Russ.)

Allen, K. R. (2007). Prodvizhenie novykh tekhnologiy na rynok [Promotion of new technologies on the market]. Moscow, Russia: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, 455. (In Russ.)

Anosova, L. A. (2017). Kitayskaya ekonomika segodnya: dostizheniya i problemy [The Chinese economy today: achieve- ments and challenges]. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Economics and Management ], 9, 4–12. (In Russ.)

Antonets, V. A., Nechaeva, N. V. , Khomkin, K. A., & Shvedova, V. V. (2010). Innovatsionnyy biznes: formirovanie modeley kommertsializatsii perspektivnykh razrabotok. [Innovative business: the formation of models for the commercialization of promising developments: a tutorial]. In K. A. Khomkina (Eds.).Moscow, Russia : Izdatel’stvo «Delo» ANKh, 320. (In Russ.) Volkova, T. I. (1993). Individual’naya intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ v nauke [Individual intellectual property in science]. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Economic Journal], 6, 137–140. (In Russ.)

Volkova, T. I. (1999). Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ v nauchno-tekhnicheskoy sfere [Intellectual property in science and technology]. Ekaterinburg, Russia: Institute of Economics (Ural Branch of the RAS), 170. (In Russ.)

Volkova, T. I., & Usoltsev, I. A. (2017). Izobretatel’skaya aktivnost’ issledovateley: mezhstranovye reytingovye otsenki [The inventive activity of researchers: cross-country ratings]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the region], 13 (1), 290–307. (In Russ.)

Volkova, T. I, & Usoltsev, I. A. (2010). Intellektual’nye produkty nauchnoy sfery: potentsial kommertsializatsii [Scientific intellectual products: potential for commercialization]. Ekaterinburg, Russia: Institute of Economics (Ural Branch of the RAS), 171. (In Russ.)

Gatsenko, O. Yu. (2001). Zashchita informatsii. Osnovy organizatsionnogo upravleniya [Protection of information. Basics of Organizational Management]. SPb, Russia: Izd. dom «Sentyabr’», 228. (In Russ.)

Dezhina, I., & Saltykov, B.(2005). Mekhanizmy stimulirovaniya kommertsializatsii issledovaniy i razrabotok[Mechanisms to promote the commercialization of research and development]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and mathematical methods], 12, 178–205. (In Russ.)

Dyatlov, S. A. (2010). Global’naya innovatsionnaya giperkonkurentsiya kak faktor transformatsii mirovoy ekonomiki [Global innovative hypercompetition as a factor in the transformation of the global economy]. Filosofiya khozyaystva [Economic philosophy], 4, 113–131. (In Russ.)

Dyatlov, S. A., & Feygin, G. F. (2018). Tsifrovoe neravenstvo i ekonomicheskoe razvitie: osobennosti stranovoy differentsiatsii [Digital Inequality and Economic Development: Peculiarities of Country Differentiation]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 10, 48–54. (In Russ.)

Klavdienko, V. P. (2016). Natsional’naya innovatsionnaya sistema Kitaya: stanovlenie i razvitie [China’s national innovation system: the formation and development]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 4, 97–103. (In Russ.)

Kovaleva, O. A., & Levina, L. K. (2017). Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita avtorskikh prav i praktika bor’by s nezakonnym is- pol’zovaniem intellektual’noy sobstvennosti v seti Internet [International copyright protection and the practice of combating the illegal use of intellectual property on the Internet]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Kazan Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia], 1, 25–30. (In Russ.)

Krasnov, L. V., Shuyskiy, V. P., Alabyan, S. S., Komissarov, A. V., & Morozenkova, O. V. (2009). Mesto Rossii na mirovykh rynkakh intellektual’nykh (nematerial’nykh) uslug v usloviyakh perekhoda k innovatsionnomu razvitiyu [Russia’s place in the global markets of intellectual (intangible) services in the transition to innovative development]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting problems], 2, 116–120. (In Russ.)

Leont’ev, B. B., & Leont’eva, V. B. (2017). Sistemnye resheniya v formirovanii natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [System solutions in the formation of a national innovation system]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 9, 28–38. (In Russ.)

Likhachev, V. A. (2017). Mezhdunarodnaya torgovlya tekhnologiyami. Pozitsiya Rossii [International trade in technology. Position of Russia]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [International economics], 2, 37–47. (In Russ.)

Lynnik, N. (2000). Zakonov dostatochno. Nuzhno ikh ispolnyat’ [Laws enough. You need to perform them]. Intellektual’naya sobstvennost’ [Intellectual property], 11, 27–30. (In Russ.)

Makarov, I. A., & Sokolova, A. K. (2018). Evolyutsiya tsepochek dobavlennoy stoimosti v ATR i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii [The evolution of value chains in the APR and opportunities for Russia]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika — [Spatial Economics], 1, 16–36. DOI: 10.14530/se.2018.1.016–036. (In Russ.)

Maksimov, R. V. Sokolovskiy, S. P., Sharifulli,n S. R., & Chernoles, V. P. (2018). Innovatsionnye informatsionnye tekh- nologii v kontekste obespecheniya natsional’’oy bezopasnosti gosudarstva [Innovative information technologies in the con- text of national security]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 3, 28–35. (In Russ.)

Men’shikova, A. M. (2017). Perspektivy innovatsionnoy politiki SShA [Prospects for US Innovation Policy]. SShA. Kanada. Ekonomika. Politika. Kul’tura [USA. Canada. Economy. Politics. Culture], 8, 101–115. (In Russ.)

Pil’nov, G., Tarasov, O., & Yanovskiy, A. (2006). Kak provodit’ tekhnologicheskiy audit [How to conduct a technology audit: Europe Aid project «Science and technology commercialization»]. Proekt Europe Aid «Nauka i kommercializacija tehnologii» [Project of Europe Aid “Science and Technology Commercialisation”]. Moscow, Russia, 96. (In Russ.)

Portanskiy, A. P. (2018). Tramp razrushaet slozhivshiesya pravila i printsipy mirovoy torgovli [Trump destroys the es- tablished rules and principles of world trade]. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [International economics], 6, 7–18. (In Russ.) Revenko, N. S. (2016). Edinyy tsifrovoy rynok ES: oblegchenie dostupa k tovaram i uslugam cherez Internet [Single EU digital market: facilitating access to goods and services via the Internet]. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies], 8, 56–71. (In Russ.)

Revenko, N. S. (2017). Tsifrovaya ekonomika SShA v epokhu informatsionnoy globalizatsii: aktual’nye tendentsii [The US Digital Economy in the Age of Information Globalization: Current Trends]. SShA. Kanada. Ekonomika. Politika. Kul’tura [USA. Canada. Economy. Politics. Culture], 8, 78–99. (In Russ.)

Samsonov, R. A., & Bocharov, S. N. (2018). Otvetstvennost’ steykkholderov pri formirovanii global’nykh tsepochek sozdaniya dobavlennoy stoimosti [Responsibility of stakeholders in the formation of global value chains]. Upravlenets [Manager], 9 (4), 53–65. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2018–9-4–6. (In Russ.)

Smirnova, V. R., & Vasil’eva, Yu. S. (2018). Postroenie innovatsionnoy ekonomiki Rossii cherez razvitie instituta intell- ektual’noy sobstvennosti [Building an innovative Russian economy through the development of an intellectual property institute]. Innovatsii [Innovation], 3, 14–19. (In Russ.)

Smotritskaya, I. I., & Chernykh, S. I. (2018). Sovremennye tendentsii tsifrovoy transformatsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Current trends in digital transformation of public administration]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics RAS], 5, 22–36. (In Russ.)

Uil’yamson, O. I. (1996). Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [Economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, «relational» contracting]. SPb, Russia: Lenizdat; CEV Press, 702. (In Russ.)

Flyaysher, K., & Bensussan, B. (2009). Strategicheskiy i konkurentnyy analiz. Metody i sredstva konkurentnogo analiza v biznese [Strategic and competitive analysis. Methods and tools for competitive analysis in business]. Moscow, Russia: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, 541. (In Russ.)

Shakirov, A. (2012). Protivodeystvie SShA narusheniyam prav intellektual’noy sobstvennosti na mezhdunarodnykh rynkakh [US countering intellectual property rights violations in international markets]. Vestnik IE RAN [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics RAS], 4, 113–124. (In Russ.)

Shastitko, A. E., Kurdin, A. A., & Komkova, A. A. (2014). Kak zashchitit’ rezul’taty intellektual’noy deyatel’nosti [How to protect the results of intellectual activity]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Modernity], 2, 17–33. (In Russ.)

Shastitko, A. E., Kudrin, A. A., Filatova, N. V., Morosanova, A. A., Levitskiy, R. Yu., & Shastitko, A. A. (2016). Osobennosti zashchity konkurentsii v sfere otnosheniy po povodu intellektual’noy sobstvennosti [Features of the protection of competition in the field of relations about intellectual property]. Moscow, Russia.: Izdatel’skiy dom «Delo»: RANKhiGS, 302. (In Russ.)

Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78 (2), 474–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.11.005.

Conner, K. R., & Rumelt, R. P. (1991). Software Piracy: An Analysis of Protection Strategies. Management Science, 37 (2), 125–139, available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.2.125.

De, Alessi L., & Staaf, R. J. (1994). What does Reputation really assure? The relationship of trademarks to expectations and legal remedie. Economic Inquiry, XXXII, 447–485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465–7295.1994.tb01344.x.

Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post-Capitalist Society. New York City: U.S. HarperBusiness, 240.

Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10 (4), 700–719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9361.2006.00343.x.

Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89 (4), 615–641.

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 97–112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97.

Picot, A., & Fiedler, M. (2003). Impacts of DRM on Internet Based Innovation. In Becker E., Buhse W., Günnewig D., Rump N. (Eds.). Digital Rights Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2770, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 288–300, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/10941270_19.

Rogerson William P. (1987). The Dissipation of Profits by Brand Name Investment and Entry When Price Guarantees Quality. Journal of Political Economy, 95(4), 797–809. DOI: 10.1086/261486.