2026 (23), №3

Institutional Factors of Russia’s Technological (In)Dependence in the Modern World-System

For citation: 

Latov, Yu. V., & Kapoguzov, E. A. (2026). Institutional Factors of Russia’s Technological (In)Dependence in the Modern World-System. AlterEconomics, 23(3), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2026.23-3.1

Abstract:

The article examines contemporary discourse on national technological sovereignty through the lens of world-systems theory. It reviews existing approaches, identifies gaps in the literature, and conceptualizes the struggle for technological sovereignty as competition between nation-states within the capitalist world-system. The analysis draws on comparative studies of scholarly approaches and national economic development models from the 19th to the 21st centuries, with particular attention to the institutional conditions shaping Russia’s technological independence. The study clarifies the concept of technological sovereignty by distinguishing between its positive and negative dimensions. The positive dimension refers to a country’s ability to independently pursue comprehensive high-tech development, including innovative breakthroughs, while the negative dimension refers to the absence of critical dependence on other countries in high technologies. From the perspective of world-systems theory, Russia’s post-2022 policies can be interpreted as an attempt to restructure its position in the global economy and reduce dependence on the technological dominance of core countries. The renewed focus on technological sovereignty since the 2010s is linked both to Russia’s aspirations to strengthen its position in the world-system and to broader changes in the global hierarchy of states. The study argues that Russia’s long-term technological strategy will depend partly on the emerging structure of the world system, including whether global leadership shifts toward another dominant power or a more polycentric system develops.

PDF full
Downloaded: 38

Yuriy V. Latov — Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Chief Research Associate, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-4192  (building 5, 24/35, Krzhizhanovsky St., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation; e-mail: latov@mail.ru).

Evgeny A. Kapoguzov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Department of State Policy, Head of the Educational and Scientific Laboratory for the Study of the Economies of the BRICS Countries, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-5654  (1/46, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation; 32, Nakhimovsky Prospect, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation; e-mail: egenk@mail.ru).

Abdulov, R. E., & Resnov, D. G. (2022). Prospects for technological sovereignty and digitalization in Russia amid unprecedented sanctions pressure. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative Economy], 16(12), 4591–4604. https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.16.12.117035  (In Russ.)

Afanasyev, A. A. (2023). Technological sovereignty: Variant approaches. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 13(2), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.2.117375  (In Russ.)

Afanasyev, A. A. (2025). Technological sovereignty: Nature, goals and mechanism of achievement. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 15(2), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.15.2.122986  (In Russ.)

Amin, S. (1982). The Future of Maoism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Amin, S. (1990). Delinking: Towards a polycentric world. London; N.J.: Zed Books.

Amin, S. (1997). Capitalism in the age of globalization: The management of contemporary society. London, New York: Zed Books, 158.

Amin, S. (2017). Rossiya: dolgiy put’ot kapitalizma k sotsializmu [Russia and the long transition from capitalism to socialism]. St. Petersburg; Moscow: INIR Publ.; Kul′turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 147. (In Russ.)

Arrighi, G. (2006 [1994]). Dolgiy dvadtsatyy vek: Den’gi, vlast’ i istoki nashego vremeni [The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times]. Moscow: Territoriya Budushchego Publ., 472. (In Russ.)

Baydarov, D. Yu., & Faykov, D. Yu. (2023). Towards Technological Sovereignty: Theoretical Approaches, Practice, Suggestions. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdeniye Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], (1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2023-1-75-67-82  (In Russ.)

Bezrukov, A. O., Baydarov, D. Yu., & Faikov, D. Yu. (2024). State Technological Leadership: Conceptual Understanding and Formation Mechanisms. Ekonomicheskoye vozrozhdeniye Rossii [Economic Revival of Russia], (1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2024-1-79-75-89  (In Russ.)

Chase-Dunn, С. (1998) Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 452.

Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984

Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2020). What Does the Notion of “Sovereignty” Mean When Referring to the Digital? Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiy [International Organisations Research Journal], 15(4), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-03  (In Russ.)

Crespi, F., Caravella, S., Menghini, M., & Salvatori, C. (2021). European Technological Sovereignty: an Emerging Framework for Policy strategy. Intereconomics, 56(6), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6

Dzarasov, R. S. (2021). Position in the Global Market as a Factor of Economic Development of Russia. Geoekonomika energetiki [Geoeconomics of Energetics], 16(4), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.48137/2687-0703_2021_16_4_120  (In Russ.)

Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 52(6), 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765

Faikov, D. Yu., & Baydarov, D. Yu. (2025). Technological independence, technological sovereignty, technological leadership: Features of strategic choice. Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 253(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2025-253-3-265-275  (In Russ.)

Faltsman, V. K. (2018). Statistical Measurements of Russia’s Technological Sovereignty. Sovremennaya Yevropa [Contemporary Europe], (3(82)), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope320188391  (In Russ.)

Filin, A. Yu. (2023). The Problem of State Sovereignty in the Context of World-System Analysis. Aktual’nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava [Actual Problems of Russian Law], 18(12), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.157.12.041-051  (In Russ.)

Gareev, T. R. (2023). Technological Sovereignty: From Conceptual Contradiction to Practical Implementation. Terra Economicus, 21(4), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-38-54  (In Russ.)

Globerman, S. (1978). Canadian Science Policy and Technological Sovereignty. Canadian Public Policy / Analyse de Politiques, 4(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3549936

Grant, P. (1983). Technological sovereignty: Forgotten factor in the ‘hi-tech’razzamatazz. Prometheus, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028308628930

Grinin, L. E., & Korotayev, A. V. (2012). Tsikly, krizisy, lovushki sovremennoy mir-sistemy. Issledovaniye kondrat’yevskikh, zhyuglyarovskikh i vekovykh tsiklov, global’nykh krizisov, mal’tuzianskikh i postmal’tuzianskikh lovushek [Cycles, Crises and Traps of the Modern World-System (Kondratiev’s, Juglar’s and Secular Cycles, Global Crises and the Malthusian and Post-Malthusian Traps]. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, 480. (In Russ.)

Ishukov, A. A. (2020). The “Center-Periphery” Model for Analysis of Regional Integration (The Case of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union). Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17(3), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-3.6  (In Russ.)

Kagarlitsky, B. Yu. (2009). Periferiynaya imperiya: tsikly russkoy istorii [Empire Periphery: Cycles of Russian History]. Moscow: Algoritm Publ., Eksmo Publ., 576. (In Russ.)

Kapoguzov, E. A., & Pakhalov, A. M. (2024). Technological sovereignty: Conceptual approaches and perceptions by the Russian academic experts. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], (3(64)), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_244-250  (In Russ.)

Kapoguzov, E. A., & Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2024). From import substitution to technological
sovereignty: Related discourse and a narrative approach perspective. Terra Economicus, 22(3),
128–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2024-22-3-128-142  (In Russ.)

Kapoguzov, E. A., & Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2026). Scientific and technological cooperation with the BRICS countries as a tool of ensuring technological sovereignty is (based on an expert survey). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], (1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034601026010189  (In Russ.)

Kapoguzov, E. A., Pakhalov, A. M., & Sheresheva, M. Yu. (2024). Russian Discourses on Technological Sovereignty (Evidence from Expert Survey). Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], (12), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524120037  (In Russ.)

Latov, Y. V. (2022). Concepts and Empirics of Transit Use of the Russian Space. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], (8), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250021067-6  (In Russ.)

Latov, Yu. V. (2020). Discourse on the “Nationalization of Elite” as an Object of Sociological Analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], (11), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250010302-5  (In Russ.)

Latova, N. V., & Latov, Yu. V. (2014). The Formation of Technoscience as the Highest Stage of Development of the Scienosphere. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], (5), 142–156. (In Russ.)

Lenchuk, E. B. (2024). Strategic Planning as a Tool for Ensuring Technological Sovereignty. Nauchnyye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii [Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia], 248, 441–451. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2024-248-4-441-451  (In Russ.)

Levin, S. N., & Sablin, K. S. (2021). Catch-up development vs. forward-looking development: From theoretical models to developmental state practices. Journal of Economic Regulation, 12(4), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2021.12.4.060-070  (In Russ.)

Lyu, J. (2026). Revisiting World-Systems Theory in the age of Dual-Core competition. Journal of World-Systems Research, 32(1), 236–261. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2026.1352

Macheda, F., & Nadalini, R. (2021). Samir Amin in Beijing: Delving into China’s delinking policy. Review of African Political Economy, 48(167). https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1837094

Nureev, R. M. (Ed.) (2017). Ekonomicheskiye sanktsii protiv Rossii: ozhidaniya i real’nost’ [Economic Sanctions against Russia: Expectations and Reality]. Moscow: KNORUS Publ., 194. (In Russ.)

Petrov, M. N., & Filippov, Y. S. (2023). Technological Sovereignty: Basic Principles of the Concept of National Scientific and Technological Security. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki [Russian Journal of Innovation Economics], 13(3), 1185–1198. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.3.118646  (In Russ.)

Poluhina, V. D. (2025). Technological Nationalism as a Factor in the Struggle for Leadership Among the Leading States in the International Arena (Using the Example of Russia, the USA and China). Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya [International Relations], (1), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0641.2025.1.72318  (In Russ.)

Potaptseva, E. V., & Akberdina, V. V. (2023). Technological Sovereignty: Concept, Content, and Forms of Implementation. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika [Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics], 25(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2023.3.1  (In Russ.)

Potaptseva, E. V., Akberdina, V. V., & Ponomareva, A. O. (2024). The Concept of Technological Sovereignty in the State Policy of Contemporary Russia. AlterEconomics, 21(4), 818–842. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2024.21-4.9  (In Russ.)

Prikhodko, I. I. (2022). Theoretical Aspects of the Concept of Technological Sovereignty. Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo. Ekonomika i upravleniye [Scientific Notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Economics and Management], 8(4), 88–96. (In Russ.)

Sapir, J. (2020). Basic Principles of Economic Sovereignty and the Question of the Forms
of Its Exercise. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 31(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1134/s107570072002015x

Sharma, A. (2023). Assessing Core-Monopolization and the possibilities for the Semi-Periphery in the World-System today. Journal of World-Systems Research, 29(2), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2023.1189

Smorgunov, L. V. (2022). Evidence-Based Policy of Technological Sovereignty and Its Design. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal sotsial’nykh nauk [South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences], 23(3), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.31429/26190567-23-3-6-19  (In Russ.)

Titova, O. V., & Voskanyan, N. A. (2021). Import Substitution: Concept, Essence, Features. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya [Innovative Economy: Prospects for Development and Improvement], (7(57)), 105–110. EDN WFKKBE (In Russ.)

Toynbee, A. J., & Huntington, S. P. (2020). Vyzovy i otvety. Kak gibnut tsivilizatsii [Challenge and Response. How Civilizations Die]. Moscow: Rodina Publ. (In Russ.)

Tsedilin, L. (2024). Economic Sovereignty: Understanding and Justification in Accordance with New Realities. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Issues Of Economic Theory], (2), 19–29. EDN FYYRCF (In Russ.)

Tsedilin, L. I. (2026). Economic Aspects of Technological Sovereignty. AlterEconomics, 23(3), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2026.23-3.15  (In Russ.)

Tyukavkin, N. M., & Anisimova, V. Y. (2023). Socio-technological types and models of implementation of import substitution policy by states and regions. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Ekonomika i upravlenie [Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management], 14(3), 145–157. http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2023-14-3-145-157  (In Russ.)

Ulyanov, N. (2017, June 12). Avoiding Technological Slavery. Monokl′ [Monocle]. https://monocle.ru/expert/2017/24/ne-popast-v-tehnologicheskoe-rabstvo/ (Date of access: 15.06.2026). (In Russ.)

Vardomskiy, L. B. (2020). Forgotten Integration: The Failure and Lessons of the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance. Kontury global’nykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law], 13(3), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-3-10  (In Russ.)

Vasilyeva, L. V. (2017). A system of classification criteria for import substitution. In V. I. Gerasimov (Ed.), Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya: Yezhegodnik, Moskva, 01–30 dekabrya 2016 goda [Russia: Trends and prospects: Yearbook, Moscow, December 01-30, 2016], 12(1), 130–136. EDN ZOAJZV (In Russ.)

Wallerstein, I. (2015–2016). Mir-sistema Moderna [The Modern World System]. (Vol. I–IV). Moscow: D. Pozharsky University. (In Russ.)

Wallerstein, I. M. (1974-2011). The Modern World-System. (Vol. I–IV). University of California Press.

Yurevich, M. A. (2023). Technological Sovereignty of Russia: Concept, Measurement, and Possibility of Achievement. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Issues of Economic Theory], (4), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_4_7_21  (In Russ.)

JATS

Продолжая использовать этот сайт, вы соглашаетесь с использованием cookie-файлов.
Принять