For citation:
Orekhovsky, P. A., & Razumov, V. I. (2025). Economic Theory of the “Classboard”: Between Reality and Simulacrum. AlterEconomics, 22(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2025.22-1.4
Abstract:
In 2023–2024, the journal Problems of Economics initiated a discussion on the content of economic education in Russia. Articles by prominent Russian economists — including A. A. Auzan (with co-authors A. A. Maltsev and A. A. Kurdin), A. V. Buzgalin, A. I. Kolganov, A. E. Shastitko, L. M. Grigorieva, V. L. Tambovtsev, and L. S. Grebnev — were published as part of this discourse. While the discussion covered a broad range of issues, it primarily centered on economic theory in its various forms. However, participants overlooked a key issue: subjects like the history of economic thought, political and economic history, and philosophy have largely disappeared from economists’ training. This article seeks to address a fundamental question: Is modern economic theory a simulacrum — akin to the political economy of socialism — or does it still provide an adequate reflection of reality? The authors argue that the recent political and economic crises, which have marked the end of globalization and led to increasing fragmentation, serve as a direct refutation of the long-dominant modernization theory. They conclude that, unlike applied disciplines such as finance, statistics, and management, economic theory as an independent field has ceased to exist in any meaningful way. As a result, discussions about what should be taught in economic theory courses become largely irrelevant — since, in practice, nearly anything can be taught under that label. To move beyond this simulacrum, it is proposed to reframe much of economic theory as part of the history of economic thought, which would help reduce ideological bias among instructors. Additionally, incorporating a course on the philosophy and methodology of economics would equip students with the tools to analyze contemporary ideological frameworks and, if necessary, create their own market-driven simulacra.
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. Filosofskiye fragmenty [Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Medium Publ., Yuventa Publ. (In Russ.)
Auzan, A. A., Maltsev, A. A., & Kurdin, A. A. (2023). Russian economic education: Image of the near future. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (10), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-10-5-26 (In Russ.)
Balatsky, E. V. (2022). The New Imperatives of Economic Knowledge: On the Way to Socionomics. Sotsialnoye prostranstvo [Social area], 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2022.4.36.2 (In Russ.)
Baudrillard, J. (2007). K kritike politekonomii znaka [For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proyekt Publ. (In Russ.)
Beugelsdijk, S., & Maseland, R. (2016). Kultura v ekonomicheskoy nauke: istoriya, metodologicheskiye rassuzhdeniya i oblasti prakticheskogo primeneniya v sovremennosti [Culture in Economics: History, Methodological Reflections, and Contemporary Applications]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute Publ.; Publishing House of International Relations; Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences of Saint Petersburg State University. (In Russ.)
Bogdanov, A. A. (1989). Tektologiya: Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka [Tectology: General Organizational Science]. In 2 Books. Moscow: Ekonomika Publ. (In Russ.)
Bourdieu, P. (2017). Homo Academicus. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russ.)
Buzgalin, A. V., & Kolganov, A. I. (2023). Economic education: A qualitative renewal is necessary and possible. Voprosy ekonomiki, (11), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-141-160 (In Russ.)
Cubeddu, R. (2008). Politicheskaya filosofiya avstriyskoy shkoly: K. Menger, L. Mizes, F. Khayek [The Philosophy of the Austrian School]. Moscow, Chelyabinsk: IRISEN, Mysl Publ., Socium Publ. (In Russ.)
Djilas, M. (1958). Novyy klass: Analiz kommunisticheskoy sistemy [The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System]. Frederick A. Praeger Publ. (In Russ.)
Fogel, R., & Engerman, S. (1974). Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery (In 2 Vol.). Little, Brown and Company.
Gaidar, E. (2006). Gibel imperii: uroki dlya sovremennoy Rossii [The Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)
Grebnev, L. S. (2024). What comes first: Certainty of goals or scarcity of means? Voprosy ekonomiki, (8), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-8-140-158 (In Russ.)
Grigoryev, L. M. (2024). Talents and their professors: What and how to teach? Voprosy ekonomiki, (8), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-8-111-126 (In Russ.)
Kirdina-Chandler, S. G. (2023). On Synthesis and Interdisciplinarity in Economics: Сomparison of Russian and English Discourses. AlterEconomics, 20 (1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2023.20-1.4 (In Russ.)
Kronrod, Ya. A. (1992). Ocherki sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya XX veka [Essays on the Socio-Economic Development of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
Lachmann, R. (2010). Kapitalisty ponevole: konflikt elit i ekonomicheskie preobrazovaniya v Evrope rannego novogo vremeni [Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and Economic Transitions in Early Modern Europe]. Moscow: “Territoriya budushchego” Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Lachmann, R. (2022). Passazhiry pervogo klassa na tonushchem korable. Politika elity i upadok velikikh derzhav [First-Class Passengers on a Sinking Ship: Elite Politics and the Decline of Great Powers]. Moscow: Tsiolkovsky Bookstore. (In Russ.)
Levy, M. J. (2010). Modernization and Structure of Societies. Princeton University Press.
Libman, A. (2023). Interdisciplinary research and mixed methods: perspectives and limitations. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki [Issues of Economic Theory], (3), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_3_35_48 (In Russ.)
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1960). Sochineniya. T. 23 [Collected Works. Vol. 23]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)
McConnell, C. R., & Brue, S. L. (1993). Ekonomiks: Printsipy, problemy i politika [Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies]. In 2 Volumes. Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russ.)
Nisbet, R. (2013). Progress. Istoriya idei [History of the Idea of Progress]. Moscow: IRISEN, Mysl Publ. (In Russ.)
North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2011). Nasiliye i sotsialnyye poryadki. Kontseptualnyye ramki dlya interpretatsii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History]. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Shastitko, A. E. (2024). Economic education as a mirror of interdisciplinary discourse. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-1-137-153 (In Russ.)
Sugden, R. (2012). Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.), Filosofiya ekonomiki: Antologiya [The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology] (pp. 475–518). Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House. (In Russ.)
Tambovtsev, V. L. (2024). Reform of economic education or reform of economic knowledge? Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-8-127-139 (In Russ.)
Voslensky, M. (1991). Nomenklatura. Gospodstvuyushchiy klass Sovetskogo Soyuza [Nomenclature. The Ruling Class of the Soviet Union]. Moscow: MP “Oktyabr” joint “Sovetskaya Rossiya” Publ. (In Russ.)
Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Vostochnyy despotizm. Sravnitelnoe issledovanie totalnoy vlasti [Oriental despotism. A comparative study of total power]. “Soviet Russia” collab. with MP October. http://samlib.ru/s/strahow_a_a/wittfogel-oriental-despotism.shtml (Date of access: 21.08.2024).
Yaspers, K. (1991). Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of the story]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russ.)
Zimbardo, P. (2014). Effekt Lyutsifera. Pochemu khoroshie lyudi prevrashchayutsya v zlodeev [The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil]. Moscow: Alpina Non-Fiction Publisher. (In Russ.)
Zinovyev, A. A. (2002). Voskhozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu: na materiale “Kapitala” K. Marksa [Ascent from the Abstract to the Concrete: Based on K. Marxs “Capital”]. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)