2020 (17), №2

Behavioral Economics: Path to the Mainstream through Classical Economics

For citation: 

Upravitelev, A. A. (2020). Behavioral Economics: Path to the Mainstream through Classical Economics. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17 (2), 509-513


The issue of merging behavioral economics with the mainstream of economic thought is currently the subject of intense scientific debate. I would like to demonstrate the commonality of behavioral economics with classical economics, taking the view that the integration of these areas will take place soon. A comparison of the selective quotes of D. Ricardo, J. S. Mill, J. B. Say, J. Ch. Sismondi with the elements of theories underlying the behavioral economics, the concept of the bounded rationality and prospect theory allows finding out a lot of connection between these opinions. In this case, the authors had the same idea about the concept of the bounded rationality and prospect theory. However, this shows that behavioral economics can be viewed not as an opposition to the mainstream, as it looked, at least at the beginning of its development, but as a kind of return to the roots of economics. This significantly leads to the recognition of this research program as part of the mainstream of economic thought, in my view. It makes a contribution to the tools for analyzing the behavior of real economic agents and opens up new perspectives for the development of the economic theory itself.

PDF full
Downloaded: 31

Aleksey Aleksandrovich Upravitelev — Master of Economics, PhD Candidate, St-Petersburg University (Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: a.a.upravitelev@gmail.com).

Avtonomov, Yu. (2019). Povedencheskaya istoriya povedencheskoy ekonomiki. (O knige R. Talera «Novaya povedencheskaya ekonomika») [The making of behavioral economics: A subjective view (On the book by R. Thaler “Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics”)] Voprosy Ekonomiki [Voprosy Ekonomiki], 8, 145–160. (In Russ.)

Mill, J. (2007.) Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii: s nekotorymi prilozheniyami k sotsial’noy filosofii [Principles of Political Economy]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 1037. (In Russ.)

Nikiforov, A., & Antipina, O. (2016). Povedencheskaya makroekonomika: na puti k novomu sintezu? [Behavioral macroeconomics: Towards a new synthesis?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Voprosy Ekonomiki], 12, 88–103. (In Russ.)

Ricardo, D. (2007). Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [The principles of political economy and taxation]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 953. (In Russ.)

Sismondi, J. Ch. L. (1937). Novye nachala politicheskoy ekonomii ili o bogatstve v ego otnoshenii k narodonaseleniyu [Nouveaux principes d’économie politique, ou de la Richesse dans ses rapports avec la population]. Moscow, Russia : Gosudarstvennoe sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo, 386. (In Russ.)

Say, J.-B. (2000). Traktat po politicheskoy ekonomii [A Treatise on Political Economy; or The Production, Distribution, and Consumption of Wealth]. Moscow, Russia: Delo, 229. (In Russ.)

Angner, E. (2019). We’re all behavioral economists now. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 195–207.

Ashraf, N., Camere,r C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2005). Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 131–145.

Collander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2004). The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499.

De Grauwe, P. (2011). Animal Spirits and Monetary Policy. Economic Theory, 47(2), 423–457.

De Grauwe, P. (2012). Lectures on Behavioral Macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 152.

Farmer, R. (2018). Keynesian economics without the Phillips curve. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 89, 137–150.

Heukelom, F. (2014). Mainstreaming Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(1), 92–95.

Morgan, M. S., & Rutherford, M. (1998). American Economics: The Character of the Transformation. History of Political Economy, 30(5), 1–26.

Truc, A. (2018). Is ‘new’ behavioral economics ‘mainstream’? Journal of Economic Methodology, 25(1), 83–104.