2019 (16), №1

Rereading Max Weber’s “Protestant Ethic”: Questions, Doubts, and Objections

For citation: 

Studentsov, V. B. (2019). Rereading Max Weber’s “Protestant Ethic”: Questions, Doubts, and Objections. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(1), 130-143

Abstract:

This article analyzes a book written by M. Weber called “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” and a number of related (content-wise) publications of this outstanding scholar. Hereby lies the basis for discrepancy with a number of assumptions made there. The concept that an “economic form” (“system”) is “filled” or “driven” by some “spirit” is not fully developed, therefore remaining incomplete and, in its major points, unconvincing. The way in which economic system and adequate spirit accommodate to one another, whether any particular form «borrows», «discovers» or «produces» its spirit, or maybe quite the opposite — a spirit «develops» corresponding economic system — is left unclear. Weber’s treatment of ascetic Protestantism is found flawed as he downplays (if not to say totally ignores) its cautious and suspicious attitude to wealth and capital accumulation as well as the emphasis on the promotion of common good. Thereby, ascetic Protestants (or Puritans as he calls them) are depicted as individualists that go against at least the seventeenth century evidence when Protestantism was at its height. Weber’s portrayal of an ascetic Protestant as an unscrupulous God’s servant with little or absolutely no concern about his actions’ effects on others is also found unrealistic and illogical. Author sides with those scholars who consider that Protestantism was initially unfavorable if not inimical to capitalism; therefore, the origins of the development of the latter’s spirit should be looked for elsewhere but not in Protestantism.

PDF full
Downloaded: 46

Viktor Borisovich Studentsov — PhD in Economics, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations; Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), Senior Research Associate (Moscow, Russian Federation; e-mail: Studentcov.Viktor@gmail.com).

Aizekson, U. (2013). Bendzhamin Franklin. Biografija [Benjamin Franklin: An American Life]. Moscow, Russia: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 466. (In Russ.)

Veber, M. (1990). Izbrannye proizvedenija [Selected Works]. Moscow, Russia: Progress, 900. (In Russ.)

Veber, M. (2017). Obshhnosti [Communities]. In Hozjajstvo i obshhestvo: ocherki ponimajushhej sociologii [Economy and Society. Essays of Comprehensive Sociology] (Vol. 2). Moscow: VShE, 429. (In Russ.)

Studentsov, V. B. (2018). Jekonomika puritan: solidarnost’ protiv stjazhatel’stva [Puritan Economics: Solidarity versus Acquisitiveness]. Zhurnal Ekonomicheskoy Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 15(1), 120–132. (In Russ.)

Franklin, B. (2015). Put’ k bogatstvu. Avtobiografija [The Way to Wealth. Autobiography]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 448. (In Russ.)

Bainton, R. H. (1961). The Reformation of the Sixteenth Century. Boston: Beacon Press, 278.

Breiner, P. (2005). Weber’s The Protestant Ethic as Hypothetical Narrative of Original Accumulation. Journal of Classical Sociology, 5(1), 11–30.

Carden, A. (1990). Puritan Christianity in America: Religion and Life in Seventeenth Century Massachusetts. Grand Rapids: Baker, 239.

Daniels, B. C. (2005). Puritans at Play: Leisure and Recreation in Colonial New England. New York: Palgrave, viii, 271. Dorfman, J. (1946). The Economic Mind in American Civilization: 1606–1865 (Vol. 1). New York: Viking Press, xxxi, 499. Ghosh, P. (2003). Max Weber’s Idea of “Puritanism”: A Case Study in the Empirical Construction of the Protestant Ethic. History of European Ideas, 29(2), 183–221.

Greyerz, K. (1995). Biographical Evidence on Predestination, Covenant, and Special Providence. In H. Lehmann & G. Roth (Eds.), Weber’s Protestant Ethics: Origins Evidence, Contexts (pp. 273–284). New York-Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton, A. (2006). Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. In S. Turner (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Weber (pp. 149–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hill, C. (1961). Protestantism and the Rise of Capitalism. In R. H. Tawney & F. J. Fisher (Eds.), Essays in the Economic and Social History of Tudor and Stuart England (pp. 15–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hill, C. (1972). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution. London: Temple Smith, 353.

Hudson, W. S. (1949). Puritanism and the Spirit of Capitalism. Church History, 18(1), 3–17.

Hyma, A. (1938). Capitalism and Calvinism in the Netherlands, 1555–1700. The Journal of Modern History, 10(3), 321–343.

Innes, S. (1995). Creating the Commonwealth: The Economic Culture of Puritan New England. New York-London: W. W. Norton & Company, x, 405.

Johnson, C. E. (2017). Commerce and Consumption. In U. Rublack (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Protestant Reformations (pp. 708–725). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kaelber, L. (2003). Review of Jere Cohen’s Protestantism and Capitalism: The Mechanics of Influence. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(4), 575–581.

Kellow, G. C. (2018). Benjamin Franklin and Adam Smith: Two Strangers and the Spirit of Capitalism. History of Political Economy, 50(2), 321–344.

Lehmann, H. (1987). Ascetic Protestantism and Economic Rationalism: Max Weber Revisited After Two Generations. Harvard Theological Review, 80(3), 307–320.

MacKinnon, M. H. (1988a). Part I: Calvinism andthe Infallible Assurance of Grace: The Weber Thesis Reconsidered. British Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 143–177.

MacKinnon, M. H. (1998b). Part II: Weber’s Explanation of Calvinism: The Undiscovered Provence of Capitalism. British Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 178–210.

MacKinnon, M. H. (1995). The Longevity of the Thesis: A Critique of the Critics. In H. Lehmann & G. Roth (Eds.), Weber’s Protestant Ethics: Origins Evidence, Contexts (pp. 211–244). New York-Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 211–244.

Marshall, G. (1982). In Search of the Spirit of Capitalism. An Essay on Max Weber’s Protestant Ethic Thesis. New York: Columbia University Press, 236.

McCloskey, D. N. (2017). Max Weber Was Wrong. Reason, 49(6), 12–13.

Miller, P. & Johnson, T. H. (1963). Introduction. In P. Miller & T. H. Johnson (Eds.), The Puritans. A Sourcebook of Their Writings (Vol. 1, pp. 1–79). New York, Evanston and London: Harper & Row, lxviii, 377.

Miller, P. (1982). The New England Mind. The Seventeenth Century. Cambridge-London: Belknap Press, xi, 528.

Moyer, J. B. (2011). “The Food Policy”: Sumptuary Prohibition on Food in the Reformation. In K. Albala & T. Eden (Eds.), Food and Faith in Christian Culture (pp. 59–81). New York: Columbia University Press.

Ryrie, A. (2015). Being Protestant in Reformation Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 490.

Ryrie, A. (2017). The Nature of Spiritual Experience. In U. Rublack (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Protestant Reformations (pp. 47–63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Samuelsson, K. (1957). Religion and Economic Action: A Critique of Max Weber. New York: Evanston, Harper & Row, 157.

Schama, S. (1987). The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. London: Collins, xiii, 698.

Tawney, R. H. (1958). Foreword. In Weber M. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.) (pp. 1–11). New York: Scribner.

Troeltsch, E. (1992). The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches (Vol. 2, Vol. 11). Louisville-London: Westminster-John Knox Press, 461–1019.

Verburg, R. (2018). Greed, Self-Interest and the Shaping of Economics. London-New York: Routledge, 215.

Weber, M. (2001a). Weber’s First Reply to Rachfahl, 1910. In D. Chalcraft & A. Harrington (Eds.), The Protestant Ethic Debate: Weber’s Replies to His Critics, 1907–1910 (pp. 60–85). Liverpool, Liverpool University Press.

Weber, M. (2001b). Weber’s Second Reply to Rachfahl, 1910. In D. Chalcraft & A. Harrington (Eds.), The Protestant Ethic Debate: Weber’s Replies to His Critics, 1907–1910 (pp. 93–132). Liverpool, Liverpool University Press.