2019 (16), №3

Scientific Criteria and Means of Enhancing the Heuristic Potential of Economic Theory

DOI:

10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.18

For citation: 

Dyatel, E. P. (2019). Scientific Criteria and Means of Enhancing the Heuristic Potential of Economic Theory. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(3), 513-527

Abstract:

The aim of the article is to verify and falsify the basic assumptions of the labour theory of value by K. Marx. This will ensure the delineation of their scientific validity and ways of integration into contemporary economic thinking. The following are the points that require rethinking: two-fold character of labour; its implementation in use and exchange value of goods; economic nature of money; patterns of production and functioning of labour power as a commodity. For example, the natural (and — in this sense — uniform) measure for use values (in units, tons, yards) and labour (cost of labour in physiological sense) cannot be used for verification of the social form of use value and sociality of work. Such a discrepancy between the naturally tangible material basis and the socio-economic form of its implementation can be seen in other basic categories of «Capital». The authorial interpretation of studied concepts is offered. It is concluded that their falsifiability represents a condition of their verification and a prerequisite for the increase of the heuristic potential of Marx’s economic theory.

PDF full
Downloaded: 32

Evgeny Petrovich Dyatel — Doctor of Economics, Professor at the Department of Political Economy, Ural State University of Economics (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; e-mail: dуatel1942@mail.ru).

Aristotel’. (1984). Soch.: v 4-kh t [Writings: in 4 vol.]. Moscow, Russia: Mysl’. (In Russ.)

Afanas’yev, Vl. (2004). Velikoye otkrytiye Karla Marksa: Metodologicheskaya rol’ ucheniya o dvoystvennom kharaktere truda [Great discovery of Karl Marx: Methodological role of studies of the two-fold character of labour]. Moscow, Russia: Mysl’, (In Russ.)

Blaug, M. (2004). Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki, ili Kak ekonomisty obyasnyayut [Methodology of economic science, or How economists explain]. Moscow, Russia: NP “Zhurnal Voprosy ekonomiki”, 416. (In Russ.)

Bochko, V. S. (2018). Raskhozhdeniye vzglyadov K. Marksa i A. I. Gertsena na perspektivy razvitiya Rossii: znacheniye dlya sovremennosti [Clash of opinions of K. Marx and A. I. Herzen on the perspective of development of Russia: contempo- rary significance]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 14(3), 740–757. (In Russ.)

Butorina, O. V. (2016). O proiskhozhdenii monet [On the origin of coins]. Sovremennaya Evropa [Modern Europe], 3(69), 124–135. (In Russ.)

Val’ras, L. (2000). Elementy chistoy politicheskoy ekonomii [Elements of clean political economy]. Moscow, Russia: Izograf, 448. (In Russ.)

Gegel’, G. V. F. (1974). Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 1. Nauka logiki [Encyclopedia of philosophical sciences. Vol. 1. Science of logic]. Moscow, Russia: “Mysl’”, 452. (In Russ.)

Gegel’, G. V. F. (1970). Nauka logiki. V trekh tomakh. Tom I [Science of logic. In 3 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Russia: Gl. red. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 471. (In Russ.)

Dubyanskiy, A. N. (2015). Gosudarstvennaya teoriya deneg G. Knappa: istoriya i sovremennost’ [The state theory of money of G. Knapp: history and modernity]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 3, 109–125. (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (2018). Obosnovaniye dialektiki ekonomicheskogo razvitiya v “Kapitale” Karla Marksa [Rationale for the dialectics of economic development in Karl Marx’s “Capital”]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 14(3), 711–724. (In Russ.)

Dyatel, E. P. (1987). Sistemnyy analiz obyekta i predmeta v «Kapitale» K. Marksa [Systemic analysis of object and subject in K. Marx’s “Capital”]. Irkutsk, Russia: Izd-vo Irkut. Un-ta, 224. (In Russ.)

Il’yenkov, E. (2009). Dialektika ideal’nogo [Dialectics of the ideal]. Logos [Logos], 1, 6–62. (In Russ.)

Avtonomov, V., Anan’in, O., Makasheva, N. (Eds.). (2009). Istoriya ekonomicheskikh ucheniy: ucheb. posobiye [History of economic doctrines: textbook]. Moscow, Russia: INFRA-M, 784. (In Russ.)

Nureyev, R. M. (Ed.). (2019). “Kapital” Karla Marksa: poltora veka spustya [Karl Marx’s “Capital”: one and a half centuries later]. Moscow, Russia: KNORUS, 402. (In Russ.)

Keyns, Dzh. M. (2007). Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg. Iz-brannoye [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Selected Works]. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 960. (In Russ.)

Kirillov, V. I., & Starchenko, A. A. (1999). Logika: Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzov [Logic: Textbook for law schools] (5th ed.). Moscow, Russia: Yurist, 256. (In Russ.)

Klark, Dzh. B. (n.d.). Raspredeleniye bogatstva [The Distribution of Wealth]. Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https:// royallib.com. (In Russ.)

Kouz, R. (1993). Firma, rynok i pravo [The Firm, the Market, and the Law]. Moscow, Russia: “Delo LTD”, 192. (In Russ.)

Kurts, Kh. D. (2018). Marks i “zakon stoimosti”. Kriticheskaya otsenka po sluchayu 200-letiya so dnya rozhdeniya [Marx and “the law of value”. Critical evaluation in celebration of the 200th anniversary of his birth]. Voprosy ekonomiki [Issues of Economics], 11. (In Russ.)

Lavrov, V. N., & Ponomareva, S. I. (2018). O prepodavanii marksistskoy politicheskoy ekonomii: diskussionnyye voprosy [On teaching Marxist political economy: debating points]. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 4. (In Russ.)

Lavrov, P. L. (1865). Predisloviye redaktora [Editor’s foreword]. In Dzh. S. Mill’, Sistema logiki [A System of Logic] (Vol. 1). St. Petersburg, Russia, 607. (In Russ.)

Lenin, V. I. (n.d.). Poln. Sobr. Soch. [Complete works] (Vol. 22, 26, 29). (In Russ.)

Marks, K., & Engel’s, F. (n.d.). Soch. [Writings] (2nd ed.; Vol. 1; 3; 16; 20; 21; 23; 26, Parts 1–3; 31; 46, Parts 1, 49). (In Russ.)

Menger, K. (1992). Osnovaniya politicheskoy ekonomii [Foundations of political economy]. In Avstriyskaya shkola v politicheskoy ekonomii. K. Menger, E. Bem-Baverk, F. Vizer [Austrian school of political economy. C. Menger, E. Böhm-Bawerk, F. Wisser] (pp. 31–242). Moscow, Russia: Ekonomika. (In Russ.)

Mill’, Dzh. S. (1865). Sistema logiki [A System of Logic] (Vol. 1). St. Petersburg, Russia, 607. (In Russ.)

Nel’son, R. R., & Uinter, S. Dzh. (2002). Evolyutsionnaya teoriya ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy [An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change]. Moscow, Russia: Delo, 536. (In Russ.)

Nort, D. (1997). Instituty, institutsional’nyye izmeneniya i funktsionirovaniye ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow, Russia: Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi “Nachala”. (In Russ.)

Nureyev, R. M. (2011). Kurs mikroekonomiki: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Course of microeconomics: textbook for universities] (2nd ed.). Moscow, Russia: Norma: INFRA-M, 561. (In Russ.)

Polan’i, K. (2014). Velikaya transformatsiya: Politicheskiye i ekonomicheskiye istoki nashego vremeni [The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time]. St. Petersburg, Russia: Aleteyya, 312. (In Russ.)

Popper, K. (1983). Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. Izbrannyye raboty [The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Selected Texts]. Moscow, Russia: “Progress”, 604. (In Russ.)

Robbins, L. (1993). Predmet ekonomicheskoy nauki [The Subject-Matter of Economics]. THESIS [THESIS], 1, 10–23.

Rokmor, T. (2015). Diskussiya o ponyatii ideal’nogo u E. V. Il’yenkova [Discussion on the notion of the ideal by E. V. Ilyenkov]. Voprosy filosofii [Issues of Philosophy], 5, 108–115. (In Russ.)

Saymon, G. A. (2000). Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy v ekonomicheskoy teorii i v nauke o povedenii [Theory of Decision Making in Economics and Behavioral Science]. In V. M. Gal’perin (Ed.), Vekhi ekonomicheskoy mysli. T. 2. Teoriya firmy [Landmarks of economic thought. Vol. 2. Theory of firm]. St. Petersburg, Russia: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 534. (In Russ.)

Smit, A. (n.d.). Issledovaniye o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations] (Book 1). Retrieved May 23, 2018, from http://www.gumer.info/. (In Russ.)

Khubiyev, K. A., & Tekeyeva, A. Kh. (2018). Aktual’nyy kontekst ekonomicheskoy teorii K. Marksa (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) [Topical context of K. Marx’s economic theory (in celebration of the 200th anniversary of his birth)]. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii [Issues of political economy], 4. (In Russ.)

Chereshnev, V. A., & Ivanitskiy, V. P. (2018). Karl Marks — myslitel’ i tvorets budushchego [Karl Marx — thinker and creator of future]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of region], 14(3), 688–698. (In Russ.)

Humphrey, C. (1985, March). Barter and Economic Disintegration. Man, New Series, 20(1), 48–72. Lancaster, K. J. (1971). Consumer Demands: A New Approach. Columbia University Press.

Polanyi, K. (1968). Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economics: Essays of Karl Polanyi. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books. Walras, L. (1874; 1877). Éléments d’économie politique pure; ou, theorie de la richess sociale. Lausanne.