Pushakrev, A. A., & Sennikova, A. A. (2019). Decomposition of the Labor Productivity Dynamics in Donor and Recipient Regions of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 16(4), 869- 874
The aim of this work is to conduct a comparative analysis of factors shaping aggregate labor productivity in Russian regions. The paper considers companies related to agriculture, forestry and fisheries, mining and manufacturing for the period from 2006 to 2015. The aggregated decomposition productivity method is used as the main analysis tool. The results obtained allow us to conclude that the prevailing effect in the growth of total labor productivity in most sectors is manifested through changes in the productivity of individual companies, rather than a redistribution of market shares of companies from less to more productive — both in industries in donor regions and in recipient regions. Moreover, we observe a number of industries where market shares of less productive firms are growing. Such a situation is observed more often in recipient regions and less often in donor regions.
Savin, I., Mariev, O., & Pushkarev, A. (2019). Vyzhivaet sil’neyshiy? Izmerenie konkurentnogo otbora na primere Ural’skogo federal’nogo okruga [Survival of the Fittest? Measuring the Strength of Market Selection on the Example of the Urals Federal District]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 23, 90–117. (In Russ.)
Accetturo, A., Di Giacinto, V., Micucci, G., & Pagnini, M. (2008). Geography, productivity and trade: does selection explain why some locations are more productive than others? Journal of Regional Science, 58(1), 949–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12393.
Bottazzi, G., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2008). Productivity, Profitability and Financial Performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 711–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn027.
Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performances and market selection. Some comparative evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1953–1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq063.
Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2012). Productivity, profitability and growth: The empirics of firm dynamics. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.08.004.
Cantner, U., Savin, I., & Vannuccini, S. (2019). Replicator dynamics in value chains: explaining some puzzles of market selection. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty060.
Ding, C., & Niu, Y. (2019). Market size, competition, and firm productivity for manufacturing in China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 74(C), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.11.007.
Dosi, G., Moschella, D., Pugliese, E., & Tamagni, F. (2015). Productivity, market selection, and corporate growth: comparative evidence across US and Europe. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9655-z.
Federico, J., & Capelleras, J.-L. (2015). The heterogeneous dynamics between growth and profits: the case of young firms. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9598-9.
Griliches, Z., & Regev, H. (1995). Firm Productivity in Israeli Industry 1979–1988. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01601-U.
Melitz, M. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
Melitz, M., & Ottaviano, G. (2008). Market Size, Trade, and Productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x.
Van Reenen, J. (2011). Does competition raise productivity through improving management practices? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(3), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.02.001.
Yosuke, O. (2005). Competition and productivity in Japanese manufacturing industries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 19(4), 586–616. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11540.