2020 (17), №1

Heterodox Theories of Strategizing Territory

For citation: 

Frolov, D. P., Strekalova, A. S., & Tazhibov, A. A. (2020). Heterodox Theories of Strategizing Territory. Zhurnal Economicheskoj Teorii [Russian Journal of Economic Theory], 17 (1), 65-78


Theoretical foundation of territory long-term-development strategic planning and management (cities, agglomerations, regions) is a set of popular applied concepts. The classical regional theories are rejected and there is no systemic theoretical alternative to its. The theoretical strategizing takes the form of the managerial art, which is the subject to of applied approaches change. The aim of the paper is to compare review of theoretical approaches heterodox type to strategic management of territorial development study. The other goal of study is to analyze the common academic research formation program perspectives. There are the following research objectives: qualitative assessment of territorial strategizing theoretical basis; the analysis of heterodox theories promotion in the field of social-economic development of territory regulations. The methodology of the study is the comparative analysis, theoretical benchmarking, expert analysis. The analysis of heterodox theory (evolutional, institutional, behavioral economy and place marketing/branding) is presented in terms of studied factors, instruments, strategic development of territories. The intersections of these approaches are identified, the model of interaction of binary and ternary is presented, the perspective of its unification and formation of integrative heterodox territorial strategizing theory is discussed.

PDF full
Downloaded: 20

Daniil Petrovich Frolov — Doctor of Economics, Professor of Department of World Economy and Economic Theory, Volgograd State Technical University (Volgograd, Russian Federation; e-mail: ecodev@mail.ru).

Anastasiya Sergeevna Strekalova — PhD in Biological Sciences, Senior Research Associate of Department of Marketing, Volgograd State University (Volgograd, Russian Federation; e-mail: strekalovaas@mail.ru).

Aziz  Abdulvagabovich  Tazhibov  —  PhD  in  Economics,  Associate  Professor  of  Department  of  State  Municipal Management, Volgograd State University (Volgograd, Russian Federation; e-mail: a_tazhibov@volganet.ru).

Adzhemoglu, D., & Robinson, Dzh. A. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proishozhdenie vlasti, procvetanija i nishhety [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Moskow, Russia: AST, X, 693. (In Russ.)

Barabashev, A. G. (2016). Krizis gosudarstvennogo upravlenija i ego vlijanie na osnovnye administrativnye paradigmy gosudarstva i bjurokratii [The crisis of public administration and its impact on the main administrative paradigms of the state and bureaucracy]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal’nogo upravlenija [Issues of state and municipal administration], 3, 163–194. (In Russ.)

Buhval’d, E. M., & Kol’chugina, A. V. (2019). Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitija i prioritety nacional’noj bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii. Spatial development strategy and national security priorities of the Russian Federation. Jekonomika regiona [The economy of the region], 15 (3), 631–643. (In Russ.)

Doklad o mirovom razvitii — 2015: Myshlenie, obshhestvo i povedenie. Mezhdunarodnyj bank rekonstrukcii i razvitija [World Development Report 2015: Thinking, Society, and Behavior. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development]. Vsemirny bank [World Bank], 36, available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/20597/WDR2015Overview-Russian.pdf?sequence=5. (In Russ.)

Doklad o mirovom razvitii 2017: Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i zakon. Mezhdunarodnyj bank rekonstrukcii i raz- vitija [World Development Report 2017: Public Administration and Law. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development].

Vsemirny bank [World Bank], 40, available at: http://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/curated/ ru/855481493188770004/pdf/112303-v2-Russian-Overview-PUBLIC-WDR-2017-Overview.pdf. (In Russ.)

Lavrikova, Yu. G., Kotlyarova, S.N., Suvorova, A. V., Ignat’eva, E. D. , Mariev, O. S. , Matushkina, N. A., Averina, L. M. , Li, V. A., & Serkova, A. E. (2018). Strategirovanie prostranstvennogo razvitiya i infrastrukturnogo obustroystva territoriy [Spatial development and infrastructure planning strategies]. Ekaterinburg, Russia: Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 178. (In Russ.)

Minakir, P. A. (2015). Regional’nye strategii i imperskie ambicii [Regional strategies and imperial ambitions]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 4, 7–11. (In Russ.)

Maevskiy, V. I., & Kirdina-Chendler, S. G. (Eds.). (2016). Novye issledovaniya v geterodoksal’noy ekonomike: rossiyskiy vklad [New research in a heterodox economy: the Russian contribution]. Moskow, Russia: Institut ekonomiki RAN, 462. (In Russ.)

Taler, R. (2017). Novaya povedencheskaya ekonomika. Pochemu lyudi narushayut pravila traditsionnoy ekonomiki i kak na etom zarabotat’ [Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics]. Moskow, Russia: Eksmo, 368. (In Russ.)

Taler, R., & Sansteyn, K. (2018). Nudge. Arhitektura vybora. Kak uluchshit’ nashi resheniya o zdorov’e, blagosostoyanii i schast’e [Nudge improving decisions about health wealth and happiness], (2nd ed.). Moskow, Russia: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 240 (In Russ.)

Florida, R. (2014). Kto tvoy gorod? Kreativnaya ekonomika i vybor mesta zhitel’stva [Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life]. Moskow, Russia: Strelka Press, 368. (In Russ.)

Frolov, D. P. (2019). Postinstitucional’naya teoriya blokcheyna [Post-institutional blockchain theory]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economic Theory], 16 (2), 262–278. (In Russ.)

Anholt, S. (2010). Definitions of place branding — Working towards a resolution. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6 (1), 1–10.

Becker, M. C., & Knudsen, T. (2017). Heterogeneity of habits as a foundation for Schumpeterian economic policy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27 (1), 43–62.

Beel, D., Jones, M., Rees Jones, I., & Escadale, W. (2017). Connected growth: Developing a framework to drive inclusive growth across a city-region. Local Economy, 32 (6), 565–575.

Bell, F. (2016). Looking beyond place branding: the emergence of place reputation. Journal of Place Management and Development, 9 (3), 247–254.

Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Steen T. (Eds.) (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge, 308.

Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2018). The dynamics of regional learning paradigms and trajectories. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28 (4), 727–748.

Cherif, R., Hasanov, F., & Wang, L. (2018). Sharp Instrument: A Stab at Identifying the Causes of Economic Growth. IMF Working Paper WP 18(117), 24.

De Vries, M., & Nemec, J. (2013) Public sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alter- native paths. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26 (1), 4–16.

Duranton, G., & Venables, A. J. (2018). Place-Based Policies for Development. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank Group, 8410, 75.

Edelenbos, J., & van Meerkerk, I. (Eds.) (2016). Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance: Self-organization and Participation in Public Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, xiii, 538, available at: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/critical-reflections-on-interactive-governance.

Green, A., Grace, D., & Perkins, H. (2018). City elements propelling city brand meaning-making processes: Urban re- minders, the arts, and residential behavior. Marketing Theory, 18 (3), 349–369.

Green, A., Froy, F., Sissons, P., & Kispeter, E. (2017). How do cities lead an inclusive growth agenda? International experiences. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, available at: finalinternationalcities2pdf.pdf

Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26, (8), 1638–1662.

Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H. and Koll, O. (2015). Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabil- ities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (4), 411–428.

Giovanardi, M., Karavatzis, M., & Lichrou, M. (Eds.). (2017). Inclusive place branding: critical perspectives on theory and practice. Routledge, 196.

Torfing, J., Guy Peters, B., Pierre, J., & Sorensen, E. (Eds.). (2012). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. New York: Oxford University Press, 280.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. N.Y.: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 499.

Kemeny, T., & Cooke, A. (2017). Urban Immigrant Diversity and Inclusive Institutions. Economic Geography, 93(3), 267–291.

Klenk, T., & Reiter, R. (2019). Post-New Public Management: reform ideas and their application in the field of social services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85 (1), 3–10.

Lee, N. (2019). Inclusive Growth in cities: a sympathetic critique. Regional Studies, 53 (3), 424–434.

Linton, J. (2018). Quiet Contributors: The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in Innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 12 (3), 6–12.

Mikuła, Ł., & Kaczmarek U. (2019). From marketization to recentralization: the health-care system reforms in Poland and the post-New Public Management concept. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85 (1), 28–44.

Nelson, R. R. et al. (2018). Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 378.

Niosi, J., & McKelvey, M. (2018). Relating business model innovations and innovation cascades: the case of biotechnology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 1081–1109.

Perilla Jimenez, J. R. (2019). Mainstream and evolutionary views of technology, economic growth and catching up. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191–019–00606–1.

Pissourios, I. A. (2014). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for The Use of Planning Standards. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21 (1), 83–99.

Pollitt, C. (2016). Be prepared? An outside-in perspective on the future public sector in Europe. Public Policy and Administration, 31 (1), 3–28.

Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking About Government. Public Management Review, 13 (5), 641–658.

Russell, M. G., & Smorodinskaya, N. V. (2018). Leveraging complexity for eco-systemic innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 114–131.

Smith, V. L. (2003). Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics. American Economic Review, 93 (3), 465–508.

Taecharungroj, V. (2016). City ambassadorship and citizenship behaviours: Modelling resident behaviours that help cities grow. Journal of Place Management and Development, 9 (3), 331–350.

The Inclusive Development Index 2018 Summary and Data Highlights. (2018). World Economic Forum, available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf.

T.-H. Jo, L. Chester, & C. D’Ippoliti (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics: Theorizing, Analyzing, and Transforming Capitalism (2017). London: Routledge, 550.

Vanolo, A. (2017). City Branding: The Ghostly Politics of Representation in Globalising Cities. London: Routledge, 218.

Werker, C., Korzinov, V., & Cunningham, S. (2019). Formation and output of collaborations: the role of proximity in German nanotechnology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191–019–00605–2/

World Inclusive Cities Approach Paper. (2015). Report No: AUS8539. Washington The World Bank, 85.